ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06159504CUTTS HepCUpdated Oct 9, 2026

Simplifying Hepatitis C Pathways for People Who Inject Drugs in Armenia, Georgia, and Tanzania

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and Shortened read time of rapid diagnostic test for hepatitis C virus. in Hepatitis C and RDT, sponsored by Médecins du Monde. Recruiting at 1 site in Armenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Médecins du Monde · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,040
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this non-randomised, quasi-experimental, prospective comparative trial is to trial simplified care pathways for hepatitis C testing and treatment for people who inject drugs in Armenia, Georgia, and Tanzania.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. What is the feasibility of implementing a hepatitis C simplified care and same-day treatment care model in community and harm reduction settings in the three study countries?
  2. Does a same-day treatment initiation model involving only POC antibody tests (with a shortened read-time) increase hepatitis C treatment uptake and SVR12 outcome (cure) among people who inject drugs compared with a simplified care model involving POC antibody followed by a confirmatory RNA test?
  3. What is the comparative cost-effectiveness between a same-day antibody only hepatitis C testing and treatment model and the simplified care model (POC antibody/confirmatory RNA test) model?

Participants will:

  • be enrolled in a new simplified model of care in each country (Arm 1). After the enrolment target is met for Arm 1 (approx. 3-9 months into implementation) new participants will be enrolled into a same-day treatment trial, using presumptive treatment after a reactive POC test result at shortened read-time (5minutes) (Arm 2)
  • if in Arm 1, participants will commence SOF-VEL DAA treatment after receiving an RNA test to confirm current hepatitis C infection. They will then continue along the treatment pathway, returning for RNA testing 4-16 weeks after SVR12 to determine cure.
  • if in Arm 2, participants will begin SOF-VEL DAA treatment on the same day as the 5 minute RDT testing. They will then continue along the treatment pathway, returning for RNA testing 4-16 weeks after SVR12 to determine cure.

Researchers will compare cure and participant retention rates between the two groups.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will conduct a study to trial a new, simplified, and lower cost clinical pathway and determine its feasibility, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability in Armenia, Georgia, and Tanzania.

This is a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, prospective comparative trial with approximately 350 participants initiated onto hepatitis C treatment in each arm. Arm one is a simplified care model (following global guidance) with hepatitis C treatment commencing after a rapid hepatitis C antibody test and a confirmatory positive hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA) test. Arm two will involve same day treatment commencement following a positive rapid antibody test without confirmatory RNA testing prior to treatment initiation (RNA testing will be completed after treatment is provided). In arm two, the decision to treat will be based on the result of an early read time (\< 5 mins) of a rapid antibody test which previous research findings suggest correlates strongly with a hepatitis C RNA positive test result. All positive participants will be treated with sofosbuvir (400mg) and velpatasvir (100mg), self-administered orally once per day for 12 weeks. Hepatitis C cure will be assessed by sustained virological response (SVR) laboratory testing.

The first primary outcome is feasibility, measured throughout the care cascade. Primary outcomes compared across the two arms will be the proportion of participants 1) commencing treatment and 2) achieving SVR. Test concordance and validity of the early read time will be assessed against laboratory RNA test results (which will also guide decisions to continue or cease treatment in Arm 2). A mixed effects model will be used to assess study outcomes and infectious diseases modelling will determine cost-effectiveness. The acceptability and feasibility of the models will be assessed through thematic analysis of participant and practitioner interviews, and site assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C
  • RDT

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Point of care (PoC)
  • Nucleic acid testing
  • Qualitative interviews
  • Feasibility
  • Acceptability
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Modelling
03

In context

Hepatitis C

1,743 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,040 is above the median of 72 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

Médecins du Monde is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Able and willing to provide in local language
  • Not currently on or previously had treatment for
  • Attending site for needle / syringe program, OR self-reports ever injecting drugs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported history of decompensate cirrhosis of the liver
  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Self-report other significant co-morbidities such as uncontrolled infection, history of renal dysfunction, tuberculosis infection, or chronic infection
  • Unable / unwilling to stop any medications / supplements
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,040 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm 1 - simplified care model

    Arm 1 will receive DAA medication at the second appointment following the return of RNA HCV results. They will receive sofosbuvir (400mg) and velpatasvir (100mg).

    Drug: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL)

  • Experimental
    Arm 2 - short read time

    Arm 2 will begin DAA treatment after the first appointment following a shortened RDT read time of 5 minutes rather than 20 minutes. They will receive sofosbuvir (400mg) and velpatasvir (100mg).

    Drug: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) · Diagnostic Test: Shortened read time of rapid diagnostic test for hepatitis C virus.

Interventions

  • Drugsofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL)

    Drug pages: Sofosbuvir · Velpatasvir

    400mg of SOF and 100mg of VEL self administered daily as a tablet.

  • Diagnostic testShortened read time of rapid diagnostic test for hepatitis C virus.

    Administered once during hepatitis C testing. Test is read after 5 minutes rather than its usual time of 20 minutes.

    Also known as: OraQuick® HCV RDT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The feasibility of implementing a hepatitis C simplified care (Arm 1) and same-day treatment (Arm 2) care models in community and harm reduction settings in the three study countries.

    Measured through case report forms, interviews and study site checks.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. The proportion of participants initiating hepatitis C treatment in simplified care Arm vs same-day treatment Arm.

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. The proportion of participants who achieve SVR following hepatitis C treatment in simplified care Arm vs same-day treatment Arm.

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. The comparative cost and cost-effectiveness of simplified care vs same-day treatment models of care.

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant acceptability of the hepatitis C simplified care and same-day treatment care models.

    Measured through interviews and surveys

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Practitioner acceptability of hepatitis C simplified care and same-day treatment care models

    Measured through interviews

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. The time to treatment initiation among participants in simplified care Arm vs same-day treatment Arm

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. The proportion of participants who complete hepatitis C treatment in simplified care Arm vs same-day treatment Arm

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. The proportion of participants whose hepatitis C antibody test result at 5-min read-time concords with RNA test results.

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. Identification of the optimal "cut-off" read-time for hepatitis C antibody test to predict RNA positivity

    Time frame: 3 years

  7. The proportion of participants "overtreated" for hepatitis C in the same-day treatment Arm.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Institute for Infectious Diseases
    Yerevan, Armenia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Draper BL, Flynn M, Schroeder S, Wisse E, Aikaeli F, Han ZM, Ayako M, Bajis S, Butsashvili M, Davtyan K, Kordzadze T, Lamand P, Luhmann N, Sargsyan K, Senkoro M, Scott N, Stone J, Vickerman P, Voloshin A, Walker J, Madden A, Stoove MA, Hellard M, Pedrana A; CUTTS HepC Consortium, Hepatitis C Models of Care Study Team. Non-randomised trial of a hepatitis C same-day test and treat model using antibody test only for people who inject drugs in Armenia, Georgia and Tanzania: a CUTTS HepC study protocol. BMJ Open. 2026 Mar 24;16(3):e114119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114119. PubMed 41876153 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 26 months after the start.

Of 45 phase 1 interventional studies under Hepatitis C, half reached primary completion within 9 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 22. This study's planned 26 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2023
First posted
Dec 6, 2023
StartActual
Oct 3, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06159504
Lead sponsor
Médecins du Monde
Collaborators
UNITAID, Burnet Institute, University of Bristol, International Network of People who Use Drugs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2023
Start date
Oct 3, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Bridget Draper
Contact
bridget.draper@burnet.edu.au
+61 413 272 698
Margaret Hellard
Contact
margaret.hellard@burnet.edu.au
Margaret Hellard
principal investigator · Burnet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion