A Phase 2 interventional study of pioglitazone and placebo in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by University of Ulm. Terminated at 15 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-29.
Sponsored by University of Ulm · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Primary objective:
Efficacy of pioglitazone (45 mg/day) as add-on therapy to standard therapy with riluzole in patients with ALS compared to placebo in terms of survival (mortality defined exclusively as death).
This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, stratified, parallel-group, double-blind trial comparing placebo with 45 mg pioglitazone as add-on therapy to 100 mg riluzole in ALS in 220 enrolled patients. For entry, the El Escorial Criteria for diagnosis will be used. The duration of treatment will be 18 months. The primary endpoint will be subjected to a confirmatory analyses. Secondary variables will be incidence of tracheotomy or non-invasive ventilation, ALS Functional Rating Scale, Quality of life and safety variables.
717 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Neuron Disease; 137 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 219 is above the median of 35 across 461 interventional studies indexed under Motor Neuron Disease.
Browse Motor Neuron Disease studies →University of Ulm is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: pioglitazone
Drug: placebo
45 mg/day, 18 months
Also known as: Actos
once daily, 18 months
Survival in patients with ALS treated with pioglitazone compared to placebo
Time frame: 18 months
Incidence of tracheotomy or non-invasive ventilation
Time frame: 18 month
This study is terminated, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Ulm