ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04628026Updated Nov 3, 2026

Phase III Study of Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy With Venetoclax in Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML or MDS-EB-2

A Phase 3 interventional study of Venetoclax and Placebo in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, sponsored by University of Ulm. Recruiting at 91 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by University of Ulm · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Updated Nov 3, 2026Site recruiting status changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
650
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy With Venetoclax in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Excess Blasts-2

Read the detailed description

Prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical study. The randomized phase of the study will be preceded by a feasibility run-in dose-escalation phase in patients with AML in which the venetoclax dose for the phase 3 part will be established.

After the feasibility run-in phase, eligible patients will be randomized to intensive chemotherapy with venetoclax or placebo. Patients will receive two cycles of induction chemotherapy; patients achieving CR or CRi after two cycles will continue with consolidation treatment according to initial randomization, and according to Cooperative Group-specific consolidation regimens or investigator choice. Patients achieving morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) only, may also continue consolidation treatment on protocol. Assignment to either allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), conventional chemotherapy or autologous HCT will be done according to institutional standards, and based on (prognostic) disease characteristics, individual patient assessment, and established comorbidity risk scores (e.g., HCT-CI score).

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

  • adult patients
03

In context

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

3,667 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; 816 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 650 is above the median of 40 across 3,005 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.

Browse Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Ulm is the lead sponsor of 143 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the International Consensus Classification (ICC).
  2. Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years.
  3. Patients considered eligible for intensive chemotherapy.
  4. (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.
  5. Molecular analysis centrally performed in AMLSG and HOVON laboratories.
  6. Adequate renal function as evidenced by serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 × upper limit of norm () or >40 mL/min based on the Cockcroft-Gault (GFR).
  7. Adequate hepatic function as evidenced by:

    • Serum total ≤ 2.5 × ULN unless considered due to Gilbert's disease, or leukemic involvement following approval by the Principal Investigators or Trial Coordinators of the study
    • (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 3.0 × ULN, unless considered due to leukemic involvement following approval by the Principal Investigators or Trial Coordinators.
  8. No prior chemotherapy for AML, except hydroxyurea for up to 14 days during the diagnostic screening phase for the control of peripheral leukemic blasts in patients with leukocytosis (e.g., white blood cell [WBC] counts > 25x109/L); patients may have had previous treatment with erythroid stimulating agents (ESA) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) for an antecedent phase of MDS; ESA and HMAs have to be stopped at least four weeks before start of study treatment.
  9. Patients must not have received a known strong or moderate inducer 7 days before start of study treatment. Patients must have no known medical conditions requiring chronic therapy with moderate or strong CYP3A inducers.
  10. Female patient must either:

    • Be of nonchildbearing potential:

      • (defined as at least 1 year without any menses)
      • Documented surgically sterile (e.g. documented hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy or congenital sterile) or status post hysterectomy (at least 1 month prior to screening)
    • Or, if of (not surgically sterile and not postmenopausal)

      • Not planning to become pregnant during the study and for 6 months after the final study drug administration
      • And have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test at screening
      • And, if heterosexually active, agree to consistently apply one highly effective* method of in combination to a barrier method for the duration of the study and for 27 weeks after the final study drug administration

        *Highly effective forms of birth control include

      • Consistent and correct usage of established hormonal contraceptives that inhibit ovulation for at least 1 month prior to taking study drug. (hormonal contraception is only a highly effective method of birth control, if a combined [estrogen and progestogen containing] hormonal contraception or a progestogen-only hormonal contraception - both associated with inhibition of ovulation - is used.
      • Established intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS)
      • Bilateral tubal occlusion
      • Vasectomy - a vasectomy is highly effective contraception method provided the absence of sperm has been confirmed. If not, an additional highly effective method of contraception should be used.
      • Male is sterile due to a bilateral orchiectomy.
      • Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual activity during the entire period of risk associated with the study drug. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient.

        *List is not all inclusive. Prior to enrolment, the investigator is responsible for confirming patient will utilize highly effective forms of birth control in combination with a barrier method according to locally accepted standards during the protocol defined period.

      • Female patient must agree not to breastfeed starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 2 months and 1 week after the final study drug administration.
      • Female patient must not donate ova starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 27 weeks after the final study drug administration.
  11. Men must use a latex condom during any sexual contact with WOCBP, even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy and must agree to avoid to father a child (while on therapy and for 27 weeks after the final study drug administration). In addition, their female partners of childbearing potential have to use a highly effective method of birth control.
  12. Male patient must not donate sperm starting at screening and throughout the study period and for 27 weeks after the final study drug administration.
  13. Able to understand and willing to sign an form (ICF).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
650 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    standard chemotherapy in combination with venetoclax

    Drug: Venetoclax · Combination Product: Standard chemotherapy · Other: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation

  • Placebo comparator
    2

    standard chemotherapy in combination with placebo

    Drug: Placebo · Combination Product: Standard chemotherapy · Other: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Interventions

  • Venetoclax will be administered in Induction cycle 1, Induction cycle 2 and in the chemo consolidation therapy in addition to the standard chemotherapy

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be administered in Induction cycle 1, Induction cycle 2 and in the chemo consolidation therapy in addition to the standard chemotherapy

  • Combination productStandard chemotherapy

    Induction cycle 1: Patients will receive cytarabine 200 mg/m2 continuous IV (days 1-7) and daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV (days 1-3). Induction cycle 2: Patients ≤ 60 yrs will receive cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 BID (3h IV), days 1-4, and daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV (days 1-3). Patients \>60 yrs will receive cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 BID (3h IV), days 1-4 without daunorubicin. Consolidation chemotherapy with intermediate doses of cytarabine. Patients ≤60 yrs will receive up to 3 cycles of IDAC (single dose 1500 mg/m2 every 12 hours, days 1-3). Patients who are \>60 yrs will receive up to 3 cycles of IDAC with single doses of 1000 mg/m2, every 12 hours, days 1-3. In patients \>60 yrs less than 3 cycles of IDAC or dose-reduced IDAC (500 mg/m2 per single dose) may be given based on an individual risk assessment.

  • OtherAllogeneic stem cell transplantation

    Generally, patients will proceed to allogeneic HCT upon completion of remission induction chemotherapy. It is however allowed, as per investigator's discretion, for a patient to receive 'bridging' consolidation chemotherapy in exceptional cases of delay towards transplantation. At baseline, HLA-compatible donor search must be initiated as soon as possible, first among siblings and second in the world donor bank for unrelated donors or cord blood. In order to avoid inappropriate delay in cases where no suitable sibling is present, high-resolution HLA typing should be performed immediately after registration, enabling a more rapid matched-unrelated donor search. In case no sibling or unrelated donor can be identified, haploidentical allogeneic HCT is allowed. Conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis will take place according to institutional guidelines. Patients who undergo allogeneic HCT will not receive venetoclax during conditioning, engraftment or after hematologic recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Event Free Survival (EFS)

    EFS in adult patients with newly diagnosed AML, defined as the time from randomization to treatment failure, death from any cause, or relapse after achieving CR or CRi, or start of new therapy due to confirmed molecular relapse whichever occurs first. Treatment failure is defined as not attaining CR or CRi after induction chemotherapy, and EFS event time for treatment failure is Day 1 of post-randomization

    Time frame: 6 months/16 months after inclusion of last patient

  2. Frequency of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the observation period (Primary safety endpoint during dose-finding phase)

    Frequency of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the observation period (from start of cycle 1 up to a maximum of day 42, or until the start of cycle 2)

    Time frame: after cycle 1 (maximal day 42)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS in patients with newly diagnosed AML

    Time frame: 6 months/16 months/28 months after inclusion of last patient

  2. CR/CRi rate

    Complete remission (CR/CRi) rate in newly diagnosed AML patients defined as the proportion of AML patients with CR/CRi after induction chemotherapy

    Time frame: 2 months

  3. CR rate

    Complete remission (CR) rates in newly diagnosed AML patients defined as the proportion of AML patients with CR after induction chemotherapy

    Time frame: 2 months

  4. Event Free Survival (EFS) including CRh

    EFS in adult patients with newly diagnosed AML, defined as the time from randomization to treatment failure, death from any cause, or relapse after achieving CR, CRh or CRi, or start of new therapy due to confirmed molecular relapse whichever occurs first. Treatment failure is defined as not attaining CR, CRh or CRi by end of induction chemotherapy, i.e. if a patient's best response during or at completion of the induction treatment is less than CR/CRh/CRi

    Time frame: 6 months/16 months after inclusion of last patient

  5. Rates of complete remission without measurable residual disease (CRMRD-) after induction therapy

    Rates of complete remission without measurable residual disease (CRMRD-) after induction therapy, defined as the proportion of AML patients achieving CR with negativity for a genetic marker by RT-qPCR, and/or with negativity by multi-color flow cytometry, if studied pre-treatment

    Time frame: 2 months

  6. Relapse-free survival (RFS) in newly diagnosed AML patients

    Relapse-free survival (RFS) in newly diagnosed AML patients, defined as the time from achievement of a remission (CR/CRh/CRi) following curative therapy (induction and consolidation), to relapse, or start of new therapy due to confirmed molecular relapse or death from any cause

    Time frame: 16 months after inclusion of last patient

  7. Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) in newly diagnosed AML patients

    Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) in newly diagnosed AML patients

    Time frame: 16 months after inclusion of last patient

  8. Cumulative incidence of death (CID)

    Cumulative incidence of death (CID) in newly diagnosed AML patients.

    Time frame: 16 months after inclusion of last patient

  9. EQ-5D-5L questionnaire of the EuroQoL (EQ) group, among AML patients

    Health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated using a 5 level (5L) scale from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum). Higher score values mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: at study entry, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months

  10. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) among AML patients

    All sub scales and single items have values from 1 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) points. A higher point value represents a better condition in terms of the functional scales and quality of life. In the symptomal sub scales a higher point value represents a worse condition.

    Time frame: at study entry, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months

  11. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cancer Fatigue short form among AML patients

    The 7-item PROMIS Cancer Fatigue Short Form assesses the frequency of fatigue in the past seven days (7). Table 2 presents a list of the items. Items are measured on a five point scale (1 = never; 5 = always) and summed, after reverse scoring item 7, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue (worse condition).

    Time frame: at study entry, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months

  12. CR/CRh rate

    Complete remission (CR/CRh) rate in newly diagnosed AML patients defined as the proportion of AML patients with CR/CRh after induction chemotherapy

    Time frame: 2 months

  13. Rates of complete remission without measurable residual disease (CR/CRh MRD-) after induction therapy

    Rates of complete remission without measurable residual disease (CR/CRh MRD-) after induction therapy, defined as the proportion of AML patients achieving CR/CRh with negativity for a genetic marker by RT-qPCR, and/or with negativity by multi-color flow cytometry, if studied pre-treatment

    Time frame: 2 months

  14. Rates of complete remission without measurable residual disease (CR/CRi MRD-) after induction therapy

    Rates of complete remission without measurable residual disease (CR/CRi MRD-) after induction therapy, defined as the proportion of AML patients achieving CR/CRi with negativity for a genetic marker by RT-qPCR, and/or with negativity by multi-color flow cytometry, if studied pre-treatment

    Time frame: 2 months

Other outcomes

  1. Rates of CR+CRi in newly diagnosed AML patients after induction 1

    Rates of CR+CRi in newly diagnosed AML patients defined as proportion of AML patients achieving CR/CRi after first course of induction

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Rates of CR in newly diagnosed AML patients after induction 1

    Rates of CR in newly diagnosed AML patients defined as proportion of AML patients achieving CR after first course of induction

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. EFS in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    EFS in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 6 months/16 months after inclusion of last patient

  4. OS in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    OS in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 6 months/16 months/28 months after inclusion of last patient

  5. CR/CRi rates in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    CR/CRi rates in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 2 months

  6. CR rates in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    CR rates in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 2 months

  7. RFS in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    RFS in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 16 months after inclusion of last patient

  8. CIR in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    CIR in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 16 months after inclusion of last patient

  9. CID in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    CID in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 16 months after inclusion of last patient

  10. Frequency and severity of AE

    Frequency and severity of AE according to CTCAE version 5.0 in newly diagnosed AML patients

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Times to hematopoietic recovery

    Times to hematopoietic recovery (absolute neutrophil counts ≥0.5 and ≥1.0 x 109/L; platelets ≥50 and ≥100 x 109/L) after each chemotherapy treatment cycle, defined as the time from the start of the cycle until recovery among AML patients

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. EFS with modified definition

    To evaluate the impact of venetoclax on EFS in newly diagnosed AML patients using modified endpoint definitions: o Modified EFS includes treatment failure defined as not achieving CR by end of induction chemotherapy assessed by investigator. The date of treatment failure is date of randomization. Patients achieving CRh or CRi are counted as events.

    Time frame: 6 months/16 months after inclusion of last patient

  13. RFS with modified definition

    To evaluate the impact of venetoclax on RFS in newly diagnosed AML patients using modified endpoint definitions: o Modified RFS includes only subjects achieving CR

    Time frame: 16 months after inclusion of last patient

  14. Rates of CR/CRh in newly diagnosed AML patients after induction 1

    Rates of CR/CRh in newly diagnosed AML patients defined as proportion of AML patients achieving CR/CRh after first course of induction

    Time frame: 1 month

  15. CR/CRh rates in newly diagnosed AML patients across different patient subgroups

    CR/CRh rates in newly diagnosed AML patients across different groups are defined based on prognostic characteristics including age at randomization , risk category according to ELN 2022 recommendations, as well as specific AML genotypes

    Time frame: 2 months

07

Study locations

76 of 91 sites recruiting
  • Tirol Kliniken GmbH
    Innsbruck, Austria
    Not yet recruiting
    • David Nachbaur · Contact
  • Kepler Universitaetsklinikum GmbH
    Linz, Austria
    Not yet recruiting
    • Clemens Schmitt · Contact
  • Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH
    Linz, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl · Contact
  • Landeskrankenhaus (LKH) Rankweil, Interne E am Landeskrankenhaus Rankweil
    Rankweil, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Bernd Hartmann · Contact
  • Gemeinnuetzige Salzburger Landeskliniken Betriebsgesellschaft mbH
    Salzburg, Austria
    Not yet recruiting
    • Lisa Pleyer · Contact
  • Hanusch Krankenhaus Der Wiener Gebietskrankenkasse
    Vienna, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Michael Pfeilstöcker, Prof. · Contact
  • Ziekenhuis Aan De Stroom
    Antwerp, Belgium
    Not yet recruiting
    • D. Breems · Contact
  • Az St-Jan Brugge-Oostende A.V.
    Bruges, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • T. Lodewyck · Contact
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
    Brussels, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • A. de Becker · Contact
  • Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven
    Leuven, Belgium
    Not yet recruiting
    • J. Maertens · Contact
  • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Delta
    Roeselare, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • D. Deeren · Contact
  • CHU UCL NAMUR - Mont Godinne
    Yvoir, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • E. Collinge · Contact
  • North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Recruiting
    • K. Palk · Contact
  • Tartu University Hospital
    Tartu, Estonia
    Recruiting
    • A. Kaare · Contact
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital Meilahden Kolmiosairaala
    Helsinki, Finland
    Recruiting
    • M. Kontro · Contact
  • Tampere University Hospital
    Tampere, Finland
    Not yet recruiting
    • J. Rimpilainen · Contact
  • Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau gGmbH
    Aschaffenburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Manfred Welslau · Contact
  • HELIOS Klinikum Bad Saarow GmbH
    Bad Saarow, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Daniel Schoendube · Contact
  • Charité Berlin - Campus Mitte
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Marie-Luise Huetter-Kroenke, Prof. · Contact
  • Charité Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
    Berlin, 12200, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Marie-Luise Hütter-Kroenke · Contact
  • Charité Berlin - Campus Virchow Klinikum
    Berlin, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Marie-Luise Huetter-Kroenke, Prof. · Contact
  • Vivantes am Urban
    Berlin, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
    • Hannes Kroenlein · Contact
  • Vivantes Neukölln
    Berlin, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
    • Maike de Wit · Contact
  • Vivantes Spandau
    Berlin, Germany
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum-Langendreer
    Bochum, 44892, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Roland Schroers, Prof. · Contact
  • Uniklinikum Bonn
    Bonn, 53127, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Lino Teichmann, Dr. · Contact
  • Staedtisches Klinikum Braunschweig
    Braunschweig, 38114, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Jürgen Krauter, Prof. · Contact
  • Gesundheit Nord gGmbH Klinikverbund Bremen
    Bremen, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Maher Hanoun · Contact
  • Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH
    Darmstadt, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
    • Helga Bernhard · Contact
  • St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund
    Dortmund, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Eva Schulte · Contact
  • Marien Hospital Duesseldorf GmbH
    Düsseldorf, Germany
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Klinikum Frankfurt Hoechst GmbH
    Frankfurt, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Felicitas Scholten · Contact
  • Justus-Liebig-Universitaet Giessen
    Giessen, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Tobias Arnold · Contact
  • Wilhelm-Anton-Hospital Goch
    Goch, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Volker Runde · Contact
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
    Greifswald, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Jan Kroenke · Contact
  • Univeritätsklinikum
    Halle, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Michael Heuser · Contact
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Franziska Westendorf · Contact
  • Asklepios Klinik Altona
    Hamburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Hans Salwender · Contact
  • Asklepios Klinik St Georg
    Hamburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Ahmet Elmaagacli · Contact
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
    Hanover, 30625, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Daniela Vanessa Wenge, Dr. · Contact
  • KRH Klinikum Siloah
    Hanover, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Kim Marienhagen · Contact
  • SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH
    Heilbronn, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Markus Lindauer · Contact
  • Marien Hospital Herne
    Herne, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Dirk Strumberg · Contact
  • Universitaetsklinikum des Saarlandes AöR
    Homburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Thomas Bittenbring · Contact
  • Wespfalz-Klinikum
    Kaiserslautern, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Gerhard Held · Contact
  • Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
    Karlsruhe, 76133, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Mark Ringhoffer, Prof. · Contact
  • Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH
    Karlsruhe, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
    • Mark · ContactRinghoffer
  • Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH
    Ludwigshafen, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Peter Paschka · Contact
  • UNIVERSITÄTSKLINIKUM Schleswig-Holstein
    Lübeck, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Friederike Wortmann · Contact
  • Otto Von Guericke Universitaet Magdeburg
    Magdeburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Mirjeta Berisha · Contact
  • Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz KöR
    Mainz, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Michael Kuehn · Contact
  • Klinikum Hochsauerland GmbH
    Meschede, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Mohammad Wattad · Contact
  • Muhlenkreiskliniken AöR
    Minden, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Kai Wille · Contact
  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU Muenchen AöR
    München, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Katharina Götze · Contact
  • Ortenauklinikum
    Offenburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Carsten Schwaenen · Contact
  • Klinikum Oldenburg AöR
    Oldenburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Andreas Voss · Contact
  • Universitaetsklinikum Regensburg AöR
    Regensburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Hendrik Poeck · Contact
  • Universitaetsklinikum
    Rostock, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Frauke Theis · Contact
  • Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart
    Stuttgart, 70176, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Jochen Greiner, Prof · Contact
  • Klinikum Traunstein
    Traunstein, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Florian Zettl · Contact
  • Barmherzige Brueder Trier gGmbH
    Trier, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Iordanis Deligiannis · Contact
  • Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromaerinnen
    Trier, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Frank Ruecker · Contact
  • Uniklinikum Tübingen
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Claudia Lengerke, Prof. Dr. · Contact
  • University Hospital Ulm
    Ulm, 89081, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Hartmut Döhner, Prof. Dr. · Contact
    • Gaidzik Verena, PD Dr. · Contact
  • Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen GmbH
    Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Paul La Rosee · Contact
  • Helios Universitaetsklinikum Wuppertal
    Wuppertal, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Silke Schostok · Contact
  • Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinik
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Not yet recruiting
    • A. Zucenka · Contact
  • Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis
    's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • A. Herbers · Contact
  • Meander Medisch Centrum
    Amersfoort, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • M. Corsten · Contact
  • Amsterdam UMC Stichting
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • D. de Leeuw · Contact
  • OLVG
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • A. Gerrits · Contact
  • Rijnstate Ziekenhuis Stichting
    Arnhem, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • M. Cuijpers · Contact
  • Amphia Hospital
    Breda, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • R. Fiets · Contact
  • Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
    Delft, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • R. Brouwer · Contact
  • Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
    Dordrecht, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • P. Westerweel · Contact
  • Maxima Medisch Centrum
    Eindhoven, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • L. Tick · Contact
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
    Enschede, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • T. Snijders · Contact
  • UMCG
    Groningen, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • S. K. Klein · Contact
  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden B.V.
    Leeuwarden, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • B. Franken · Contact
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
    Leiden, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • H. Veelken · Contact
  • Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+)
    Maastricht, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • J. van Elssen · Contact
  • Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis Stichting
    Nieuwegein, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • M. Söhne · Contact
  • Radboudumc
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • J. Janssen · Contact
  • Erasmus MC - Daniel
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • M. Jongen-Lavrenic · Contact
  • Hagaziekenhuis, locatie Leyweg
    The Hague, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • D. Lammeren, van-Venema · Contact
  • UMCU
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • A. van Rhenen · Contact
  • Isala Klinieken Stichting
    Zwolle, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • G. van Sluis · Contact
  • Haukeland University Hospital
    Bergen, Norway
    Recruiting
    • O. Sefland · Contact
  • Stavanger Univ. Hosp.-Rogaland Hosp.
    Oslo, Norway
    Not yet recruiting
    • A. Lenartova · Contact
  • University Hospital of North Norway
    Tromsø, Norway
    Not yet recruiting
    • N. Leknes · Contact
  • St. Olavs Hospital
    Trondheim, Norway
    Recruiting
    • A. von Krogh · Contact
08

Timeline

4 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2029, 78 months after the start.

Of 78 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, half reached primary completion within 87 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 66 and three quarters within 111. This study's planned 78 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 120 studies reached it within 74 months; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 99.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 2020
First posted
Nov 13, 2020
StartActual
Sep 13, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2029
CompletionEst.
Feb 2032
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
5 sites changed recruiting status (5 now recruiting)
Show 5 sites
  • Az St-Jan Brugge-Oostende A.V. · Bruges, BelgiumNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Universitaetsklinikum Regensburg AöR · Regensburg, GermanyNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Barmherzige Brueder Trier gGmbH · Trier, GermanyNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+) · Maastricht, NetherlandsNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Haukeland University Hospital · Bergen, NorwayNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
across 3 updates, Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 2 sites. See the sites
Show 2 sites
  • Hanusch Krankenhaus Der Wiener Gebietskrankenkasse · Vienna, AustriaContact person changed (no phone or email listed)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · Hanover, GermanyContact person changed (no phone or email listed)
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 4 updates
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Haukeland University Hospital is now Recruiting
  2. Oct 29, 2026
    Site contacts Changed at 2 sites. See the sites
    Show 2 sites
    • Hanusch Krankenhaus Der Wiener Gebietskrankenkasse · Vienna, AustriaContact person changed (no phone or email listed)
    • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · Hanover, GermanyContact person changed (no phone or email listed)
  3. Oct 16, 2026
    2 sites changed recruiting status (2 now recruiting)
    Show 2 sites
    • Barmherzige Brueder Trier gGmbH · Trier, GermanyNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+) · Maastricht, NetherlandsNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  4. Oct 6, 2026
    2 sites changed recruiting status (2 now recruiting)
    Show 2 sites
    • Az St-Jan Brugge-Oostende A.V. · Bruges, BelgiumNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • Universitaetsklinikum Regensburg AöR · Regensburg, GermanyNot yet recruiting→Recruiting

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04628026
Lead sponsor
University of Ulm
Collaborators
Stichting Hemato-Oncologie voor Volwassenen Nederland
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Hartmut Doehner (Prof. Dr., University of Ulm) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2020
Start date
Sep 13, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Hartmut Doehner, MD
Contact
harmut.doehner@uniklinik-ulm.de
004973150045501
Hartmut Doehner, MD
principal investigator · University of Ulm

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Venetoclax

Start the discussion