ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06877143PEGASUSUpdated May 6, 2026

Hypercaloric PEG Nutrition in ALS to Sustain Energy Homeostasis

An interventional study of 100% of individual calory requirement and 120% of individual calory requirement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), sponsored by University of Ulm. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.

Sponsored by University of Ulm · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Weight loss is a known negative prognostic factor in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Over the last years, various interventional studies targeting the energy deficit in ALS yielded promising results; however,it is still unclear which kind of nutrition or nutritional supplement is most beneficial. Moreover, there is lack of evidence regarding interventions in patients with a PEG in later disease stages.In a pilot study conducted in 2013, it was demonstrated that body weight can be stabilized in ALS by applying either a fat-rich or carbohydrate-rich high-caloric food supplement. In 2014, Wills et al. conducted a placebo-controlled randomized controlled pilot study, which indicated that a carbohydrate-rich, hypercaloric diet, consisting in 125% of estimated energy requirements as determined by indirect calorimetry, in patients fed via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was safe and well tolerated. Moreover, these patients showed longer survival than patients fed with a fat-rich, hypercaloric diet or an isocaloric diet . Hypercaloric, high-carbohydrate diet also showed beneficial effects on body weight and Body Mass Index . Although these results were promising, the low number of patients (n=24) was a severe limiting factor of this study. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a hypercaloric PEG nutrition, consisting of 120% of estimated calorie requierements, compared to an isocaloric nutrition. Individual energy requirement is determined by performing indirect calorimetry and activity questionnaire. The investigators hypothsize, that a hypercaloric PEG nutrition slows down disease progression as measured by neurofilament light chains (NfL) in serum after 6 months compared to placebo. Power calculation relies on the results of the lipids and calories for ALS (LIPCAL-ALS) study which tested the effect of an oral high-caloric fatty nutritional supplement in ALS. The study revealed that NfL serum values declined significantly in the intervention group while remaining stable in the placebo group over the course of the study. Assuming a similar effect size, we calculated that 76 patients had to be included in the current trial.

Read the detailed description

Patients eligible for study participation will be randomized to one of two groups (hypercaloric or isocaloric diet) at baseline visit. Intervention or control diet will be administered as an add-on to standard therapy. Calory requirement will be individually determined by indirect calorimetry which measures resting energy expenditure (REE) and by collecting physical activity data. Indirect calorimetry is a non-invasive procedure which allows to calculate resting energy expenditure by measuring carbon dioxide and oxygen in the expired air using a canopy hood or a full-face mask. For both groups, a standard PEG nutrition featuring a balanced ratio of fat, carbohydrates, and protein according to human requirements will be used (e.g. Fresenius Fresubin® Energy Fibre/2250 Complete).

PEG nutrition used in this study (e.g. Fresenius Fresubin® Energy Fibre/2250 Complete) is routinely used in clinical practice for feeding of patients with ALS and PEG. It is known to be well tolerable and safe. In few cases of intolerance, this standard tube feeding may be switched to another product (e. g. HiPP Sondennahrung), but the amount of calories will not be changed.

In clinical routine, energy needs are usually estimated using the Harris-Benedict-formula, based on body weight, height, sex and age. However, this formula only provides approximate values. Therefore, in this study, indirect calorimetry is used to obtain precise values of energy needs. The German version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Last 7 Days Self-administered Format (IPAQ) is used for determining the physical activity level. The total energy requirement is calculated by adding the resting energy expenditure and the activity-related calorie requirement.

In the control group, 100% of the estimated calorie requirement is administered with the goal of covering energy needs and stabilizing body weight. The hypercaloric diet in the intervention group consists in 120% of the calorie requirement determined by indirect calorimetry. Resting energy expenditure in ALS patients is 14% higher than in a healthy control cohort. We assume that activity-related energy expenditure is increased similarly. Therefore, the hypercaloric diet consisting in 120% of calorie requirement aims to cover these additional energy needs. Similarly, a recent study in patients with PEG used 125% of calorie requirement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Keywords

  • ALS
  • PEG
  • hypercaloric nutrition
  • energy deficit
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

978 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 76 is above the median of 38 across 662 interventional studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Ulm is the lead sponsor of 143 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Possible, probable (clinically or laboratory) or definite ALS according to the revised version of the El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria 1
  • Loss of ALS functional rating scale revised (ALSFRS-R) of ≥ 0.33 points per month since onset (first paresis) based on the formula: (48 - Score at Screening Visit) / (Months between Onset and Screening Visit)
  • Nutrition via PEG
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Intake of a stable dose of riluzole for at least 4 weeks, or no riluzole
  • Capable of thoroughly understanding all information given and giving full according to GCP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous participation in another interventional study within the preceding 4 weeks
  • Absence of adequate social support and cooperation, or personal motivation (in the judgment of the investigator) to complete the study satisfactorily
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding females
  • Evidence of a major psychiatric disorder or clinically evident dementia
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
76 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Group A: Isocaloric nutrition via PEG

    Isocaloric nutrition (100% of individual calory requirement as determined by indirect calorimetry and physical activity questionnaire) applied via PEG

    Dietary Supplement: 100% of individual calory requirement

  • Experimental
    Group B: Hypercaloric nutrition via PEG

    Hypercaloric nutrition (120% of individual calory requirement as determined by indirect calorimetry and physical activity questionnaire) applied via PEG

    Dietary Supplement: 120% of individual calory requirement

Interventions

  • Dietary supplement100% of individual calory requirement

    Patients receive any PEG nutrition containing the calory requirement as determined by indirect calorimetry, physical activity score and the randomized group.

  • Dietary supplement120% of individual calory requirement

    Patients receive any PEG nutrition containing the calory requirement as determined by indirect calorimetry, physical activity score and the randomized group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) in serum

    Change of neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentration in serum after 6 months compared to baseline. The change will be measured as individual NfL slope from baseline to 6 months (change per month).

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survival

    time to death or tracheostomy

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. ALS functional rating scale revised (ALSFRS-R)

    Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) score, measured as individual slope (loss of points per month)

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Body mass index (BMI)

    Body Mass Index (BMI), weight (in kg) and height (in m) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Slow vital capacity

    Slow vital capacity (sVC)

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Resting energy expenditure (REE)

    Resting Energy Expenditure (REE), measured by indirect calorimetry

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Individual Quality of Life

    Individual Quality of Life, measured by the Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Appetite

    Appetite, measured by the Council of Appetite Questionnaire (CNAQ)

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Eating habits

    Eating Habits, evaluated by the Ulm Nutrition Questionnaire (UNQ; see LIPCAL study)

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Adverse Events

    Terms and frequencies of adverse eves (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Fatt mass

    Fat mass (% of total body mass), measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Total Body Water

    total body water (% of total body mass), measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. Muscle Mass

    muscle mass (% of total body mass) measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  13. Fat Free Mass

    fat free mass (% of total body mass), measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. Body Cell Mass

    body cell mass (% of total body mass), measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  15. Extracellular Mass

    extracellular mass (% of total body mass), measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Lean Body Mass

    lean body mass (% of total body mass), measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  17. Beta Hydroxybutyrate

    Beta Hydroxybutyrate serum levels

    Time frame: 6 months

  18. Acetoacetate

    Acetoacetate serum levels

    Time frame: 6 months

  19. Acetone

    Acetone concentration in urine

    Time frame: 6 months

  20. Lipid metabolism

    Cholesterol serum levels

    Time frame: 6 months

  21. Lipid metabolism

    High-density-lipoprotein (HDL) serum levels

    Time frame: 6 months

  22. Lipid metabolism

    Low-density-lipoprotein (HDL) serum levels

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ulm Universita, Department of Neurology
    Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg 89081, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Christine Herrmann, Dr. · Contactchristine.herrmann@uni-ulm.de · 0049 731 177 5374
    • Christine Herrmann, Dr. · Principal investigator
    • Johannes Dorst, Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data after de-identification as well as the study protocol will be available. Data will be available beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Data will be shared for analyses to achieve the aims provided in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to christine.herrmann@uni-ulm.de; to gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: 3 months to 5 years following article publication

Access criteria: Data will be shard for analyses to achieve the aims provided in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to christine.herrmann@uni-ulm.de; to gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.uniklinik-ulm.de

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2031, 72 months after the start.

Of 134 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 72 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 154 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 26, 2025
First posted
Mar 14, 2025
StartActual
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2031
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2031
Last update
May 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06877143
Lead sponsor
University of Ulm
Responsible party
Albert Christian Ludolph, Prof. (Prof. Dr., University of Ulm) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 14, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2026

Study contacts

Christine Herrmann, Dr.
Contact
christine.herrmann@uni-ulm.de
0049 731 177 5374
Johannes Dorst, Prof. Dr.
Contact
johannes.dorst@uni-ulm.de
0049 731 177 5285
Christine Herrmann, Dr.
principal investigator · University of Ulm

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion