A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Atorvastatin in HIV Infections and Hyperlipidemia, sponsored by International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Terminated at 11 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 23 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-06.
Sponsored by International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
Treatment of HIV with combination antiretroviral regimens frequently results in the suppression of HIV viral load, significant immune recovery, and delayed disease progression. However, treatment with these regimens, particularly protease inhibitors (PIs), has been associated with significant increases in cholesterol and triglycerides in HIV-infected adults and children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of escalating doses of atorvastatin, a FDA-approved drug which lowers cholesterol and triglyceride levels, in HIV-infected children receiving stable antiretroviral regimens.
Antiretroviral regimens, particularly those containing PIs, often cause hyperlipidemia, which is an increase in the amount of fat (such as cholesterol and triglycerides) in the blood. These increases can lead to heart disease and pancreatitis. Although the mechanism by which PIs cause hyperlipidemia is not clearly understood, there are medications to combat this side effect. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of escalating doses of atorvastatin, based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, in HIV-infected children receiving stable antiretroviral therapy.
Participants were assigned to one of two groups based on age (10 to 14 years or 15 to 23 years) and were treated for a maximum of 48 weeks. The first six participants enrolled in the study were in the 15 to 23 year old age group. Once safety data through week 8 on these 6 participants was analyzed, the remaining participants were enrolled. All participants received atorvastatin in combination with a stable antiretroviral regimen. Each participant was followed independently according to a dose escalation algorithm for atorvastatin. Participants began dosing at 10 mg daily. If efficacy criteria were not met, dosing increased to 20 mg daily at week 8. Since dose escalations were done within subject, safety and efficacy rates were presented for the dose-escalation strategy overall and not for individual doses. Atorvastatin was provided by the study, but antiretrovirals were not.
Study visits occurred at study entry and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48. Safety labs were collected at all study visits. Blood collection for lipid measurements occurred at weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48.
821 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperlipidemias; 105 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 87 across 691 interventional studies indexed under Hyperlipidemias.
Browse Hyperlipidemias studies →International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants ages 10 to 14 years receiving oral atorvastatin for 48 weeks while on a stable antiretroviral regimen
Drug: Atorvastatin
Participants ages 15 to 23 years receiving oral atorvastatin for 48 weeks while on a stable antiretroviral regimen
Drug: Atorvastatin
10 mg to 20 mg atorvastatin taken orally once daily. Dosage is dependent on efficacy criteria.
Also known as: Lipitor
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Treatment-related Adverse Event (AE)
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the core study team. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
Time frame: Study entry to weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
Time frame: Study entry to weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Who Met the LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Efficacy Criteria (Intention to Treat)
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Who Met the LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Efficacy Criteria (Data Available)
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Who Met the LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Efficacy Criteria (Per Protocol)
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Who Met the LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Efficacy Criteria and Did Not Experience a Primary Safety Endpoint Attributable to Study Drug
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Who Met the LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Efficacy Criteria by Age Group
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Who Met the LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Efficacy Criteria by NNRTI Treatment
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Treatment-related Adverse Event (AE) by Age Group
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the core study team. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
Time frame: Study entry to weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE) by Age Group
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
Time frame: Study entry to weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in Triglycerides (TG) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A-1) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in High-sensitivity CRP (Hs-CRP) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change in Interleukin 6 (IL-6) From Study Entry
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Plasma HIV-1 RNA
Undetectable is defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA below the lower limit of quantification of the assay used.
Time frame: Study entry and weeks 12, 24, and 48
Recruitment occurred between August 31, 2009 (date first participant enrolled) and December 16, 2013 (date last participant enrolled).
| Milestone | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Started | 28 |
| Dose increased to 20 mg at week 8 | 10 |
| Completed | 27 |
| Not completed | 1 |
| Withdrew: Not willing to adhere to requirements | 1 |
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the core study team. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
| percentage of participants | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Week 12 | 3.6 (0.2 to 15.9) |
| Week 24 | 3.6 (0.2 to 15.9) |
| Week 48 | 7.1 (1.3 to 20.8) |
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
| percentage of participants | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Week 12 | 21.4 (9.8 to 38.0) |
| Week 24 | 21.4 (9.8 to 38.0) |
| Week 48 | 28.6 (15.1 to 45.7) |
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
| percentage of participants | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Week 4 | 60.7 (43.5 to 76.2) |
| Week 12 | 46.4 (30.1 to 63.4) |
| Week 24 | 57.1 (40.0 to 73.1) |
| Week 48 | 53.6 (36.6 to 69.9) |
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
| percentage of participants | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Week 4 (N=27) | 63.0 (45.3 to 78.3) |
| Week 12 (N=27) | 48.2 (31.3 to 65.3) |
| Week 24 (N=26) | 61.5 (43.6 to 77.4) |
| Week 48 (N=26) | 57.7 (39.8 to 74.2) |
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
| percentage of participants | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Week 4 | 69.2 (42.7 to 88.7) |
| Week 12 | 69.2 (42.7 to 88.7) |
| Week 24 | 84.6 (59.0 to 97.2) |
| Week 48 | 53.9 (28.7 to 77.6) |
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
| percentage of participants | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Week 4 | 57.7 (39.8 to 74.2) |
| Week 12 | 50.0 (32.7 to 67.3) |
| Week 24 | 57.7 (39.8 to 74.2) |
| Week 48 | 53.9 (36.2 to 70.8) |
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
| percentage of participants | 10 to 14 Years Old | 15 to 23 Years Old |
|---|---|---|
| Week 4 | 71.4 (34.1 to 94.7) | 57.1 (37.2 to 75.5) |
| Week 12 | 28.6 (5.3 to 65.9) | 52.4 (32.8 to 71.4) |
| Week 24 | 71.4 (34.1 to 94.7) | 52.4 (32.8 to 71.4) |
| Week 48 | 71.4 (34.1 to 94.7) | 47.6 (28.6 to 67.2) |
Efficacy was defined as having LDL-C of 110 mg/dL or less or at least 30% decline in LDL-C from baseline to the specified week.
| percentage of participants | NNRTI-exposed | NNRTI-unexposed |
|---|---|---|
| Week 4 | 66.7 (34.5 to 90.2) | 57.9 (36.8 to 77.0) |
| Week 12 | 55.6 (25.1 to 83.1) | 42.1 (23.0 to 63.2) |
| Week 24 | 44.4 (16.9 to 74.9) | 63.2 (41.8 to 81.3) |
| Week 48 | 55.6 (25.1 to 83.1) | 52.6 (32.0 to 72.6) |
| percentage of LDL-C at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in LDL-C at Week 4 (N=27) | -30.3 (-34.6 to -26.1) |
| Percent change in LDL-C at Week 12 (N=27) | -26.5 (-32.4 to -20.5) |
| Percent change in LDL-C at Week 24 (N=26) | -28.0 (-32.7 to -23.4) |
| Percent change in LDL-C at Week 48 (N=26) | -26.4 (-33.1 to -19.7) |
| percentage of TC at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in TC at Week 4 (N=27) | -23.8 (-26.8 to -20.8) |
| Percent change in TC at Week 12 (N=27) | -21.1 (-25.1 to -17.1) |
| Percent change in TC at Week 24 (N=26) | -22.5 (-26.0 to -19.0) |
| Percent change in TC at Week 48 (N=26) | -21.5 (-26.4 to -16.6) |
| percentage of TG at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in TG at Week 4 (N=27) | -9.5 (-20.4 to 1.4) |
| Percent change in TG at Week 12 (N=27) | -12.6 (-19.5 to -5.7) |
| Percent change in TG at Week 24 (N=26) | -11.3 (-22.8 to 0.2) |
| Percent change in TG at Week 48 (N=26) | -12.6 (-22.5 to -2.7) |
| percentage of HDL-C at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in HDL-C at Week 4 (N=27) | 1.8 (-2.5 to 6.1) |
| Percent change in HDL-C at Week 12 (N=27) | 2.3 (-1.1 to 5.7) |
| Percent change in HDL-C at Week 24 (N=26) | 3.0 (-3.1 to 9.1) |
| Percent change in HDL-C at Week 48 (N=26) | 4.2 (-3.5 to 11.9) |
| percentage of Apo A-1 at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in Apo A-1 at Week 12 (N=24) | 0.8 (-3.2 to 4.8) |
| Percent change in Apo A-1 at Week 24 (N=23) | 2.4 (-2.7 to 7.5) |
| Percent change in Apo A-1 at Week 48 (N=24) | 0.3 (-4.8 to 5.4) |
| percentage of Apo B at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in Apo B at Week 12 (N=24) | -27.2 (-32.0 to -22.4) |
| Percent change in Apo B at Week 24 (N=23) | -25.1 (-29.5 to -20.7) |
| Percent change in Apo B at Week 48 (N=24) | -23.8 (-30.5 to -17.1) |
| percentage of hs-CRP at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in hs-CRP at Week 12 (N=25) | 0 (-35 to 44) |
| Percent change in hs-CRP at Week 24 (N=23) | -20 (-67 to 0) |
| Percent change in hs-CRP at Week 48 (N=24) | 0 (-78 to 17) |
| percentage of IL-6 at study entry | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Percent change in IL-6 at Week 12 (N=24) | -1 (-32 to 110) |
| Percent change in IL-6 at Week 24 (N=23) | -19 (-32 to -5) |
| Percent change in IL-6 at Week 48 (N=24) | -11.5 (-34 to 46) |
Undetectable is defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA below the lower limit of quantification of the assay used.
| percentage of participants | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Week 0 (N=28) | 71.0 (54.0 to 85.0) |
| Week 12 (N=26) | 69.0 (51.0 to 84.0) |
| Week 24 (N=26) | 62.0 (44.0 to 77.0) |
| Week 48 (N=26) | 69.0 (51.0 to 84.0) |
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. Relationship to study treatment was determined by the core study team. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
| percentage of participants | 10 to 14 Years Old | 15 to 23 Years Old |
|---|---|---|
| Week 12 | 14.3 (0.7 to 52.1) | 0 (0 to 13.3) |
| Week 24 | 14.3 (0.7 to 52.1) | 0 (0 to 13.3) |
| Week 48 | 28.6 (5.3 to 65.9) | 0 (0 to 13.3) |
AEs were graded by the clinicians according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE Grading Table (see references in the Protocol Section) as follows: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Potentially Life-Threatening, Grade 5=Death. The primary outcome measure includes any AE of grade 3 or higher and liver function tests (LFTs) of grade 2 or higher.
| percentage of participants | 10 to 14 Years Old | 15 to 23 Years Old |
|---|---|---|
| Week 12 | 14.3 (0.7 to 52.1) | 23.8 (9.9 to 43.7) |
| Week 24 | 14.3 (0.7 to 52.1) | 23.8 (9.9 to 43.7) |
| Week 48 | 28.6 (5.3 to 65.9) | 28.6 (13.2 to 48.7) |
Collected over From date of Atorvastatin initiation until Week 48.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atorvastatin | — | 3/28 (10.7%) | 27/28 (96.4%) |
| Event | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| PneumoniaInfections and infestations | 1/28 |
| Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations | 1/28 |
| Hepatic enzyme increasedInvestigations | 1/28 |
| Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders | 1/28 |
| Event | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Blood cholesterol increasedInvestigations | 16/28 |
| Low density lipoprotein increasedInvestigations | 16/28 |
| Blood bicarbonate decreasedInvestigations | 11/28 |
| CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 9/28 |
| Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 7/28 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 7/28 |
| Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations | 6/28 |
| Blood glucose decreasedInvestigations | 6/28 |
| Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations | 6/28 |
| Nasal congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 6/28 |
All participants who initiated Atorvastatin were included in the baseline characteristics.
| Age, Continuous(years) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Mean | 17 ± 4 |
| Age, Customized(participants) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| 10 - <15 years old | 7 |
| 15 - <19 years old | 12 |
| 19 - <24 years old | 9 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| Female | 19 |
| Male | 9 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| White Non-Hispanic | 4 |
| Black Non-Hispanic | 18 |
| Hispanic (Regardless of Race) | 5 |
| Asian, Pacific Islander | 1 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| United States | 28 |
| CD4 Percent at screening, Categorical(participants) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| 15% to <25% | 2 |
| >=25% | 26 |
| HIV-1 RNA, Categorical(participants) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| >=Lower limit of quantification of assay | 8 |
| <Lower limit of quantification of assay | 20 |
| Antiretroviral (ARV) Regimen at entry, Categorical(participants) | Atorvastatin |
|---|---|
| At least one PI and at least one NNRTI | 5 |
| At least one PI and no NNRTI | 17 |
| At least one NNRTI and no PI | 4 |
| Other ARV regimen | 2 |
This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group