ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00640133Updated Jul 29, 2024Results posted

Effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treating People With Treatment Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

A Phase 4 interventional study of Active DBS and Sham DBS in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, sponsored by Butler Hospital. Status unknown at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-29.

Sponsored by Butler Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2024), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in treating people with severe and otherwise treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Read the detailed description

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and debilitating illness that affects between 2% and 3% of adults in the United States. People with OCD often experience persistent unwanted thoughts and carry out ritual-like behaviors to rid themselves of these obsessive thoughts. Additionally, OCD symptoms are usually tied with feelings of intense anxiety and functional impairment, making it important for people with OCD to seek effective treatment. Although there are currently many treatment options for OCD, including psychotherapy and medications such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors, between 40% and 60% of people with OCD only partially respond or do not respond at all to these treatment methods. Given the large percentage of people who do not respond to aggressive conventional treatments, alternative options are necessary for people with treatment-resistant OCD. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a procedure that involves the use of thin wires to carry electric current to parts of the brain associated with producing OCD symptoms. DBS has been effectively and safely used to treat movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, and may be beneficial in reducing OCD symptom severity. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of DBS in treating people with severe and otherwise treatment-resistant OCD.

Study participation through follow-up will last 4 years. Participants will be allowed to remain on any pre-surgical medications or behavioral therapy programs throughout the study. Before surgery, all participants will undergo a 3- to 4-day series of initial tests and examinations that will include a physical and neurological examination; blood and urine screening tests; an electrocardiogram (EKG); an electroencephalography (EEG); and detailed psychological testing, including tests of perception, learning, and memory. The EEGs may be performed again after surgery to measure potential changes in brain electrical activity due to DBS.

On the day of the surgery, participants will take a low dose of anxiety medication, have a metal frame fixed to their heads for support during surgery, and undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to determine where to place the stimulating wires. After being injected with a local anesthetic, participants will undergo the first part of the operation, which will involve the implantation of neurostimulators in the ventral caudate/ventral striatum brain region. For the second part of the operation, after participants are administered general anesthesia, they will have the implantable neurostimulators (INSs) placed in their chests and the connecting wires to the brain placed under their skin. The entire surgical procedure will take 3 to 4 hours, with a 1- to 2-day post-operative hospital stay for recovery. During the post-operative stay, participants will undergo x-rays and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the head.

Two to 3 weeks after surgery, participants will be divided randomly into either a group that receives DBS immediately or a group that first receives sham DBS and then active DBS after 3 months. The level of stimulation will be adjusted individually and on the basis of each participant's response to the stimulation. Participants will complete rating forms, a clinical evaluation, and a check of the stimulators every month for the first 3 months, then at least every 3 months for the rest of the year, and then every 6 months for the remaining years of the study. On the Year 1 visit, participants will repeat the baseline detailed psychological testing. Periodically throughout the 4-year study, staff will contact participants by phone to ask about OCD symptoms, mood, anxiety, and possible side effects. Also throughout the study, participants will need to have the INSs replaced every 5 to 16 months on average.

Participants will also be invited to participate in a related study that involves positron emission tomography (PET) scanning to determine how the stimulation changes activity in the brain. Participation in the separate PET study is optional and will not affect current study participation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Keywords

  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Treatment Refractory
  • Ventral Internal Capsule/Ventral Striatum
  • Neurosurgery
  • Neuroimaging
03

In context

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

626 studies on the registry are indexed under Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; 162 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 45 across 510 interventional studies indexed under Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Browse Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Butler Hospital is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), diagnosed by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV)
  • Presence of disabling severity, as assessed by a Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score of at least 30
  • Impaired functioning, indicated by a Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score of 45 or less
  • Documented highly treatment refractory illness; the documentation must demonstrate persistence of severe symptoms and impairment for 5 or more years despite at least three first-line and two second-line treatments, as follows:

    1. at least three adequate trials of, or documented intolerance to, different serotonin transporter inhibitors (e.g., fluoxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, clomipramine) for at least 3 months at the maximum tolerated dose. These trials may include any of the agents above, but must include an adequate course of clomipramine, either alone or in combination with a more selective serotonin transporter inhibitor;
    2. augmentation of one of the selective serotonin transporter inhibitors with clomipramine, and a neuroleptic (each for at least 2 weeks); and
    3. adequate behavior therapy (more than 20 sessions of exposure and response prevention by a therapist with substantial expertise in OCD treatment as determined by the investigators) with at least one of these trials and tried in combination with medication therapy
  • Either drug free or on a stable drug regimen for at least 6 weeks before study entry
  • General good overall health
  • If possible, has a family member or significant other who sees the participant regularly, can communicate with the study team as needed, and, if necessary, can attend study visits
  • Local referring psychiatrist willing to provide ongoing care during and after the trial, to work closely with the research team, and to agree that the study psychiatrist will prescribe medications during the 3-month masked phase
  • Platelet count greater than 125,000 per cubic millimeter and a prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time within normal limits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past psychotic disorder
  • Full-scale IQ below 75 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI), or cognitive impairment that would affect a participant's ability to give informed consent or provide interview or self-report data reliably, as determined by the Consent Monitor and the site psychiatrist.
  • A clinical history of bipolar mood disorder
  • Any current clinically significant neurological disorder or medical illness affecting brain function, other than a tic disorder
  • Any clinically significant abnormality on preoperative MRI
  • Any labeled DBS contraindication, inability to undergo presurgical MRI (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, pregnancy, metal in body, severe claustrophobia), infection, coagulopathy, inability to undergo an awake operation, significant cardiac risk factors, or other medical risk factors for surgery
  • Current or unstable remitted substance abuse or dependence
  • Positive urine toxicology screen for substance abuse
  • Pregnant and/or woman of childbearing age not using effective forms of birth control
  • Clinical history of severe personality disorder
  • An inability to control suicide attempts, imminent risk of suicide in the investigator's judgment, or a history of serious suicidal behavior, which is defined using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as either (1) one or more actual suicide attempts in the 3 years before study entry with the lethality rated at 3 or higher, or (2) one or more interrupted suicide attempts with a potential lethality judged to result in serious injury or death
  • Current diagnosis of body dysmorphic disorder
  • Evidence of dementia of other significant cognitive impairment on neuropsychological evaluation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active DBS

    Participants will receive deep brain stimulation.

    Device: Active DBS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham DBS

    Participants will receive sham deep brain stimulation for several months and then active deep brain stimulation thereafter.

    Device: Active DBS · Device: Sham DBS

Interventions

  • DeviceActive DBS

    In DBS, thin wires are used to carry electric current to the parts of the brain involved in OCD symptoms. These wires are implanted surgically and are attached to battery operated stimulators usually implanted in the chest. The study doctor will adjust the settings of the electrical stimulation to optimize treatment for each participant. After a post-operative rest, participants will receive immediate DBS treatment throughout.

    Also known as: Activa Deep Brain Stimulation System (Medtronic, Inc.), Implantable Neurostimulator (INS)

  • DeviceSham DBS

    In DBS, thin wires are used to carry electric current to the parts of the brain involved in OCD symptoms. These wires are implanted surgically and are attached to battery operated stimulators usually implanted in the chest. The study doctor will mimic adjusting the settings of the electrical stimulation. After a post-operative rest, participants will receive DBS treatment after a delay of several months. Afterwards, all participants will receive open-label long-term DBS.

    Also known as: Activa Deep Brain Stimulation System (Medtronic, Inc.), Implantable Neurostimulator (INS)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS Severity Ratings)

    The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) is a 10 question evaluator-administered measure assessing the severity of obsessions and compulsions over the past week. Obsession and compulsion severity are evaluated separately (ratings from 0-20 for each category) with total scores ranging from 0-40. Higher scores for obsessions, compulsions and total score indicate more severe symptoms over the past week.

    Time frame: YBOCS total score observed means at month-12

  2. Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)

    A numeric scale (0 through 100) used to rate the social, occupational, and psychological overall functioning during the week of poorest functioning in the past month. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning, while low scores indicate impaired global functioning.

    Time frame: GAF score observed means at month-12

  3. Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)

    A numeric scale (0 through 100) used to rate the social, occupational, and psychological functioning during the week of poorest functioning in the past month. Higher scores indicate higher levels of social and occupational functioning, while low scores represent social and occupational impairment.

    Time frame: SOFAS score observed means at month-12 time point.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)

    The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is a self-administered measure to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by participants in various areas of daily functioning. We used the 16-item short form with total scores ranging from 16-80. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction experienced during the past week.

    Time frame: QLESQ total score observed means at month-12 time point.

  2. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is an interviewer-administered measure assessing the ten symptoms of depression most sensitive to change. Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts are assessed and total scores range from 0-60 with higher scores representing the presence of more severe depression over the past week. interviewer-administered measure assessing

    Time frame: MADRS total score observed means at month-12 time point.

  3. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)

    Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) is a 14-item test measuring the severity of anxiety symptoms. It provides measures of overall anxiety, psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress), and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety); total scores range from 0-56. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety over the past week.

    Time frame: HARS total score observed means at month-12 time point.

  4. Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)

    The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) is a 29-item scale that measures the role of aversive controlling stimuli and escape and avoidance behavior in depression, specifically when and how participants become more activated over the course of treatment. Total scores range from 29-203 and lower scores indicate higher levels of escape and avoidance behavior from depression in the past week.

    Time frame: Total BADS score observed means at month-12 time point.

  5. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

    The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) measures the severity of depressive symptoms in adults. The evaluator-administered ratings measure depressed mood, guilt, suicide, insomnia, work/activities, retardation, agitation, psychic and somatic anxiety, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight during the past week. Total scores range from 0-72 and higher scores indicate the presence of more severe depression over the past week. Note: this measure was only administered at baseline and month-3.

    Time frame: Total HDRS score observed means at month-3 time point.

07

Results

Posted Oct 11, 2019

Participant flow

The study is a parallel controlled design. Patients (n=27) were assigned to a condition by site \& gender via urn randomization to receive three months of double-masked sham or double-masked active DBS. After 3 months, all patients received open-label active DBS. 12 patients were in the sham group while 15 patients received active DBS immediately.

Randomization Phase (Baseline-Month 3)
Participant flow — Randomization Phase (Baseline-Month 3)
MilestoneActive DBSSham DBS
Started1512
Completed1512
Not completed00
Open Label Phase (Month 4-12)
Participant flow — Open Label Phase (Month 4-12)
MilestoneActive DBSSham DBS
Started270
Completed240
Not completed30
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Adverse event10

Outcome measures

PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS Severity Ratings)

The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) is a 10 question evaluator-administered measure assessing the severity of obsessions and compulsions over the past week. Obsession and compulsion severity are evaluated separately (ratings from 0-20 for each category) with total scores ranging from 0-40. Higher scores for obsessions, compulsions and total score indicate more severe symptoms over the past week.

Time frame:
YBOCS total score observed means at month-12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS Severity Ratings)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS Severity Ratings)20.5 ± 10.620.9 ± 7.0
PrimaryGlobal Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)

A numeric scale (0 through 100) used to rate the social, occupational, and psychological overall functioning during the week of poorest functioning in the past month. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning, while low scores indicate impaired global functioning.

Time frame:
GAF score observed means at month-12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)54.8 ± 16.553.7 ± 8.2
PrimarySocial and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)

A numeric scale (0 through 100) used to rate the social, occupational, and psychological functioning during the week of poorest functioning in the past month. Higher scores indicate higher levels of social and occupational functioning, while low scores represent social and occupational impairment.

Time frame:
SOFAS score observed means at month-12 time point.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)55.9 ± 16.053.9 ± 7.1
SecondaryQuality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)

The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is a self-administered measure to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by participants in various areas of daily functioning. We used the 16-item short form with total scores ranging from 16-80. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction experienced during the past week.

Time frame:
QLESQ total score observed means at month-12 time point.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)39.8 ± 12.842.7 ± 8.4
SecondaryMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is an interviewer-administered measure assessing the ten symptoms of depression most sensitive to change. Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts are assessed and total scores range from 0-60 with higher scores representing the presence of more severe depression over the past week. interviewer-administered measure assessing

Time frame:
MADRS total score observed means at month-12 time point.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)17.1 ± 12.818.5 ± 10.1
SecondaryHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) is a 14-item test measuring the severity of anxiety symptoms. It provides measures of overall anxiety, psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress), and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety); total scores range from 0-56. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety over the past week.

Time frame:
HARS total score observed means at month-12 time point.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)12.6 ± 8.815.7 ± 11.4
SecondaryBehavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)

The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) is a 29-item scale that measures the role of aversive controlling stimuli and escape and avoidance behavior in depression, specifically when and how participants become more activated over the course of treatment. Total scores range from 29-203 and lower scores indicate higher levels of escape and avoidance behavior from depression in the past week.

Time frame:
Total BADS score observed means at month-12 time point.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)85.3 ± 28.980.3 ± 22.7
SecondaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) measures the severity of depressive symptoms in adults. The evaluator-administered ratings measure depressed mood, guilt, suicide, insomnia, work/activities, retardation, agitation, psychic and somatic anxiety, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight during the past week. Total scores range from 0-72 and higher scores indicate the presence of more severe depression over the past week. Note: this measure was only administered at baseline and month-3.

Time frame:
Total HDRS score observed means at month-3 time point.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
units on a scaleActive DBSSham DBS
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)16.8 ± 9.619.4 ± 13.9

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected beginning after DBS device implantation and continued throughout each patient's participation in the study up to four years post-implantation and up to one year after exiting the protocol.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active DBS0/15 (0%)3/15 (20%)10/15 (66.7%)
Sham DBS0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)7/12 (58.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActive DBSSham DBS
InfectionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/151/12
Symptom worseningNervous system disorders1/150/12
Motor effect (fall)Nervous system disorders1/150/12
Periorbital swellingInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/150/12
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventActive DBSSham DBS
Symptom worseningNervous system disorders4/154/12
GI discomfort/symptomsGastrointestinal disorders1/153/12
HypomaniaNervous system disorders1/152/12
Headache/migraineNervous system disorders1/152/12
Post-surgical discomfort/painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/151/12
InfectionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/150/12
Tiredness/severe fatigueNervous system disorders2/150/12
InsomniaNervous system disorders0/151/12
Alcohol-related eventNervous system disorders1/150/12
Pocket stimulationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/150/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
Mean43.3 ± 12.935.1 ± 10.539.6 ± 12.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
Female6511
Male9716
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino141226
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White151025
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
United States151227
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)(units on a scale)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
Mean33.3 ± 2.333.5 ± 2.333.5 ± 2.3
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)(units on a scale)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
Mean37.0 ± 6.841.6 ± 2.939.0 ± 5.8
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)(units on a scale)Active DBSSham DBSTotal
Mean38.5 ± 8.041.5 ± 3.939.9 ± 6.6

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Kaiser Permanente Redwood City Hospital
    Redwood City, California 94063, United States
  • George Washington University Hospital
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • The Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Butler Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02906, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Greenberg BD, Malone DA, Friehs GM, Rezai AR, Kubu CS, Malloy PF, Salloway SP, Okun MS, Goodman WK, Rasmussen SA. Three-year outcomes in deep brain stimulation for highly resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Nov;31(11):2384-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301165. Epub 2006 Jul 19. PubMed 16855529 ↗
  • Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, Heninger GR, Charney DS. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1006-11. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007. PubMed 2684084 ↗
  • Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, Blumenthal R. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):321-6. PubMed 8290681 ↗
  • Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382. PubMed 444788 ↗
  • Kanter, J. W., Rusch, L. C., Busch, A. M., & Sedivy, S. K. (2009). Validation of the behavioral activation for depression scale (BADS) in a community sample with elevated depressive symptoms. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 36-42.
  • HAMILTON M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-5. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x. No abstract available. PubMed 13638508 ↗
  • HAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. No abstract available. PubMed 14399272 ↗
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • McLaughlin NC, Didie ER, Machado AG, Haber SN, Eskandar EN, Greenberg BD. Improvements in anorexia symptoms after deep brain stimulation for intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 May 1;73(9):e29-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.09.015. Epub 2012 Nov 3. No abstract available. PubMed 23128051 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 10, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 16, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00640133
Lead sponsor
Butler Hospital
Responsible party
Dr. Benjamin Greenberg (Professor, Butler Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 21, 2008
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
May 24, 2018
Completion
Dec 1, 2024 (estimated)
Results posted
Oct 11, 2019
Last update
Jul 29, 2024

Study contacts

Benjamin D. Greenberg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Butler Hospital/Brown University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion