ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00636116Updated Jan 10, 2012

Phase 3 Multicenter Comparative Study to Confirm Safety and Effectiveness of the F(ab)2 Antivenom Anavip.

A Phase 3 interventional study of Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2 and Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2 in Snake Bite, sponsored by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.. Completed at 18 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-01-10.

Sponsored by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. (part of Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
121
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to establish if F(ab)2 antivenom (Anavip) is safe for crotalinae envenomation. Confirm its effectiveness in preventing the occurrence of delayed coagulopathies and compare the safety and efficacy with Fab antivenom (CroFab) in patients with Crotalinae envenomation.

Read the detailed description

Fewer than 200,000 crotaline envenomations occur annually in the US.Crotaline venoms contain a broad variety of toxins, venom variability and injection quantity among individual snakes and across species result in broadly variable patient presentations. Clinical consequences of crotaline envenomation include local and systemic effects, both of which may progress for hours to days.The best studied systemic consequence is coagulopathy, which may in its complexity mimic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Platelet and clotting disorders respond rapidly to administration of polyvalent antivenom.

Crotaline viper envenomation in the United States is treated with one of two licensed products: Wyeth Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (Polyvalent), or CroFab® (antivenin Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab, ovine). In recent years, both of these products have been in critically short supply. Use of Wyeth Polyvalent has been associated with a greater than 75% incidence of adverse reactions, including acute type 1 and delayed type 2 immune reactions.These phenomena are an inherent risk in the use of whole immunoglobulin. CroFab´s low molecular weight creates a pharmacokinetic mismatch with crotaline venom which leds to a recurrent venom effects.

Anavip is pharmacologically and pharmacokinetically different.Because of the elimination of the Fc portion of the immunoglobulin molecule, Anavip is expected to produce far fewer adverse reactions than seen with whole immunoglobulin antivenoms and unlike Fab molecules, F(ab)2 molecules exceed the size threshold for renal clearance and thus are expected to remain in circulation for a significantly longer time and substantially reduce the incidence of recurrent coagulopathy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Snake Bite

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • snake bite
  • antivenin treatment
03

In context

Snake Bites

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Snake Bites; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 121 is above the median of 70 across 18 interventional studies indexed under Snake Bites.

Browse Snake Bites studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women 2 to 80 years of age
  • Presenting for emergency treatment of pit viper bite
  • document read and signed by patient (or parent/legal guardian)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of any antivenom, or use within the last month
  • Current participation in a clinical drug study, or participation within the last month
  • Positive urine or blood pregnancy test at screening
  • Breast-feeding
  • Allergy to horse serum, sheep serum, or papaya
  • Underlying medical conditions that significantly alter count or fibrinogen; thrombocytopenia, hemophilia, familial dysfibrinogenemia, leukemia
  • Use of any medication expected to affect platelet count, coagulation factors or fibrinogen: chemotherapeutic agents, warfarin, heparin
  • No clinical indications of snake bite requiring antivenom for treatment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
121 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    Anavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy

    Biological: Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2

  • Experimental
    Group 2

    Anavip with Placebo Maintenance Therapy

    Biological: Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2

  • Active comparator
    Group 3

    CroFab with CroFab Maintenance Therapy

    Biological: Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, ovine

Interventions

  • BiologicalCrotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2

    Anavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy

    Also known as: Anavip

  • BiologicalCrotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2

    Anavip with Placebo Maintenance Therapy

    Also known as: Anavip

  • BiologicalCrotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, ovine

    CroFab with CroFab Maintenance Therapy

    Also known as: CroFab

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence rate of patients experiencing coagulopathy during the follow-up phase of the study. Absolute Platelet levels < 150,000/mm3. Absolute Fibrinogen levels < 150 mg/dL. Clinical coagulopathy requiring additional antivenom.

    Time frame: Study Day 5 (±/- 1 day), Study Day 8 (±/- 1 day)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison between groups of: Percentage of patients who experience venonemia. Absolute platelet level measured Lowest absolute platelet level measured Absolute fibrinogen level Lowest absolute fibrinogen level

    Time frame: Study Day 5 (+/- 1 day) and Study Day 8 (+/- 1 day)

07

Study locations

18 sites
  • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Maricopa Integrated Health System
    Phoenix, Arizona 85008, United States
  • Northwest Medical Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85741, United States
  • Tucson Medical Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85712, United States
  • University Physicians Hospital
    Tucson, Arizona 85713, United States
  • University Medical Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
  • University of California San Diego
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Rady Children's Hospital
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Florida Poison Information Center
    Jacksonsville, Florida 32209, United States
  • Sarasota Memorial Hospital
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • LSU Health Sciences Center, Lousiana Poison Control Center
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • The Children's Mercy Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • The University of New Mexico Hospital
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, United States
  • Pitt County Memorial Hospital
    Greenville, North Carolina 27834, United States
  • St. Joseph Regional Health Center
    Bryan, Texas 77802, United States
  • West Texas Regional Poison Center at Thomason Hospital
    El Paso, Texas 79905, United States
  • Scott and White Memorial Hospital
    Temple, Texas 76508, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00636116
Collaborators
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, University of Arizona
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 14, 2008
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2011
Completion
Jan 2012
Last update
Jan 10, 2012

Study contacts

Walter García Ubbelohde, MD
study director · Instituto Bioclon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion