ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07659002Updated Jun 22, 2026

Polyvalent Antivenom (Premium-PANAF) for Snakebite Envenoming in Ethiopia

An observational study in Snake Envenomation, sponsored by Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlands. Recruiting at 1 site in Ethiopia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlands · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Snakebite Envenomation is recognised as a Neglected Tropical Diseases with high lethality in Sub-Saharan Africa. The current syndromic treatment approach is also fraught by supply pipeline constraints and need for cold-chain, thus negatively impacting outcomes in resource limited settings.

Despite the lack of clinical outcome data from studies in humans, after a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment, the World Health Organisation (WHO), in May 2023, recommended the use of Premium-PANAF polyvalent snake antivenom that is lyophilised, and therefore does not require cold-chain conditions. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) also updated its treatment protocol with Premium PANAF being standard of care since June 2025 at Abdurafi (Midre Genet) Health Centre in north west Ethiopia.

Real-world effectiveness by means of Phase IV post marketing studies or pharmacovigilance programmes in countries where it has recently been rolled out is not yet available. This prospective observational cohort study, with a capped sample size of 600 patients, would thus provide much needed evidence on the safety and effectiveness of Premium-PANAF in resource limited settings to help inform national and international treatment guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Snake Envenomation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • prospective observational cohort
  • Ethiopia
  • treatment
  • safety
  • effectiveness
  • antivenom
  • snakebite
03

In context

Snake Bites

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Snake Bites; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 99 across 19 observational studies indexed under Snake Bites.

Browse Snake Bites studies →

Lead sponsor

Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlands is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients presenting to Abdurafi health centre in Northwest Ethiopia with snakebite envenoming from June 2025 - June 2026.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Snakebite envenoming patients who receive Premium-PANAF antivenom
  • Patients who have given written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Snakebite envenoming patients who do not receive Premium-PANAF antivenom
  • Patients referred from other centres who already received other antivenom treatment
  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to give
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
42 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Snakebite Envenomation treated with Premium PANAF

    Patients admitted with snakebite envenomation who recieve Premium PANAF antivenom as standard of care and consent for particpation in the study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety (Allergic Reactions)

    Proportion of patients with severe allergic reactions within 6 hours of antivenom administration according to the Brown grading system

    Time frame: 6 hours

  2. Effectiveness (Correction of Coagulopathy)

    Correction of coagulopathy as measured by the 20-minute whole blood clotting test at 6 hours after antivenom administration

    Time frame: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness (Number of Vials)

    Number of doses (vials) needed to reverse the envenomation syndrome

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Effectiveness (Rescue Treatment)

    Proportion of patients who require rescue treatment with EchiTab-Plus or SAIMR due to lack of responsiveness to Premium-PANAF

    Time frame: 14 days

  3. Effectiveness (Mortality)

    Death from any cause within 42 days of treatment with antivenom

    Time frame: 42 days

  4. Effectiveness (Patient Specific Function Scale)

    Patient-specific Function Scale (PSFS) score

    Time frame: 42 days

  5. Effectiveness (Major Bleeding)

    Proportion of patients with in-hospital major bleeding (defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria)

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Effectiveness (Cessation of Bleeding)

    Proportion of patients with cessation of bleeding

    Time frame: 6 hours

  7. Effectiveness (Serial 20WBCT)

    Proportion of patients with reversal of correction of coagulopathy as measured by serial 20min WBCT

    Time frame: 14 days

  8. Effectiveness (Blood Transfusion)

    Proportion of patients who require blood transfusion during hospitalization

    Time frame: 14 days

  9. Effectiveness (Surgical Intervention)

    Proportion of patients who require surgical intervention

    Time frame: 14 days

  10. Effectiveness (Skin Necrosis)

    Mean and median total surface area of full thickness skin necrosis in cm2

    Time frame: 48 hours

  11. Effectiveness (Swelling Reduction)

    Reduction of swelling extension

    Time frame: 6 hours

  12. Effectiveness (Renal Replacement Therapy)

    Proportion of participants referred for renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: 14 days

  13. Effectiveness (Creatine Kinase)

    Peak serum creatine kinase in U/L

    Time frame: 14 days

  14. Effectiveness (Need for Ventilation)

    Proportion of participants needing mechanical or manual ventilation

    Time frame: 48 hours

  15. Safety (Presence of Shock)

    Proportion of patients with shock (shock defined as systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg in adults, or age adjusted blood pressure in children)

    Time frame: 3 hours

  16. Safety (Need for Adrenaline)

    Proportion of patients requiring adrenaline

    Time frame: 14 days

  17. Safety (Anaphylaxis)

    Proportion of patients experiencing anaphylaxis after antivenom administration

    Time frame: 2 hours

  18. Safety (Need for intravenous fluids)

    Proportion of patients requiring IV fluids following an allergic reaction

    Time frame: 2 hours

  19. Safey (Serum Sickness)

    Proportion of patients with confirmed or probable serum sickness

    Time frame: 28 days

  20. Safety (Any Other)

    Any other (serious) adverse events after enrolment in the study among participants with at least one dose of antivenom delivered

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Abdurafi Health Center
    Ābderafī, Amhara, Ethiopia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All of the individual participant data collected during the study, after de-identification.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Access criteria: Anyone who wishes to access the data in line with MSF data sharing policy: https://www.msf.org/sites/default/files/msf_data_sharing_policy_final_061213.pdf

Data sharing details ↗ · remit.msf.org

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07659002
Lead sponsor
Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlands
Collaborators
University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 22, 2026
Start date
Jun 2, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion