CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00632606MagHeadUpdated Dec 25, 2012

MgSO4 vs Metoclopramide for Headache in Pregnant Women

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of magnesium sulfate and metoclopramide in Headache, sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-12-25.

Sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study will compare effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulfate to that of intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan®) for acute headache in pregnant women. We will randomize pregnant women who present to our emergency department with chief complaint of headache to magnesium sulfate 2 grams intravenously or metoclopramide 10 mg intravenously; both groups will receive acetaminophen (Tylenol®) 1 gram orally and normal saline 1 liter intravenously. Headaches are common during pregnancy, related to hormonal changes, altered sleep patterns and psychosocial stressors. Common medications for headache such as non-steroidal antiinflammatories or triptans are typically avoided during pregnancy due to concern for fetal effects. Women, and their physicians, are often uncertain regarding available medication options with justifiable safety profiles during pregnancy.

Read the detailed description

Metoclopramide and prochlorperazine (Compazine®), antiemetic dopamine receptor antagonists, are widely used for headache treatment in North American emergency departments. Metoclopramide, FDA pregnancy category B, is used in clinical practice for acute headache in pregnant women. Small studies have found magnesium sulfate to be effective in migraine, tension and cluster headaches, although there is no data regarding efficacy or tolerability in pregnant women.

Our study would be similar to a Turkish study published in 2004 which compared magnesium sulfate to metoclopramide for acute headache treatment in nonpregnant individuals; they found the drugs equally effective 30 minutes after administration. Serum magnesium levels in pregnant women are often lower than in nonpregnant women; magnesium deficiency has been explored as contributing to headache frequency and severity. Magnesium sulfate use has been well established during pregnancy for decades, administered intravenously to delay labor or to women with preeclampsia for 24 to 48 hours, initially with 4 to 6 gram bolus then 2 grams per hour. For headache treatment, magnesium sulfate dose would be far lower, 2 grams. We would like to determine the efficacy and tolerability of magnesium sulfate for headache relief in pregnant women, as well as evaluate efficacy of metoclopramide in pregnant women. We do not find published randomized trials evaluating headache treatment in pregnant women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Headache

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pregnant women
03

In context

Headache

1,226 studies on the registry are indexed under Headache; 202 are open to participants now.

Browse Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island is the lead sponsor of 92 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant, 18-75
  • Headache rated 4 or greater on a 0-10 pain scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • New objective neurologic abnormality at the time of exam
  • Temperature >100.4
  • Allergy or intolerance to study medications
  • Suspected of confirmed preeclampsia/eclampsia
  • Complete heart block
  • Hypotension, SBP\<85
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • End stage renal failure
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm 1

    magnesium sulfate 2 grams intravenously w/ acetaminophen 1 gram orally

    Drug: magnesium sulfate

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2

    metoclopramide 10 mg intravenously w/ 1 gram acetominophen orally

    Drug: metoclopramide

Interventions

  • Drugmagnesium sulfate

    magnesium sulfate 2 grams intravenously; both groups will receive acetaminophen (Tylenol®) 1 gram orally

  • Drugmetoclopramide

    metoclopramide 10 mg intravenously; both groups will receive acetaminophen (Tylenol®) 1 gram orally

    Also known as: Reglan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The study will compare effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulfate to that of intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan®) for acute headache in pregnant women.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
    Providence, Rhode Island 02905, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 25, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00632606
Lead sponsor
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Responsible party
Ghada Bourjeily (Dr. Ghada Bourheily, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2008
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Completion
Mar 2010
Last update
Dec 25, 2012

Study contacts

Meghan Hayes, MD
principal investigator · Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Dec 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion