ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00584935Updated May 4, 2026Results posted

Clinical Trial Evaluating Rituximab in Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Rituximab in Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2006, registered Dec 2007).
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cicatricial pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering disease which affects the skin, mucous membranes, and, in a small subset of patients, the eye. Progressive ocular disease can lead to irreversible damage and blindness. Conventional treatments include systemic steroids, dapsone, and immunosuppressive agents. These treatments, however, are not successful with all patients. Rituximab has been very effective in the treatment of other autoimmune disorders, and has recently been shown to be effective for autoimmune blistering pemphigus. We propose that it will also be effective in the treatment of cicatricial pemphigoid.

Read the detailed description

Cicatricial pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering disease which can affect the skin, mucous membranes, and, in a small subset of patients, the eyes. Progressive ocular disease can lead to irreversible damage and blindness. Conventional treatments have included high dose systemic steroids, dapsone, and immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate mofetil. However, there are a subgroup of patients who fail to respond to these treatments, develop intolerable side effects, or have contraindications to their use. Patients may also develop resistance to these conventional treatment modalities. For these reasons, alternative treatment modalities are needed. Rituximab has been very effective in the treatment of other autoimmune disorders. It has recently been shown to be effective in the treatment of another autoimmune blistering disorder known as pemphigus. We thus propose that Rituximab will be effective in the treatment of cicatricial pemphigoid.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid

Keywords

  • Pemphigoid
  • Blistering Diseases
  • Blindness
  • Autoimmune
  • Rituximab
03

In context

Pemphigoid, Bullous

64 studies on the registry are indexed under Pemphigoid, Bullous; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 30 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Pemphigoid, Bullous.

Browse Pemphigoid, Bullous studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,421 studies on the registry; 277 are open to participants now.

Of its 164 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 130 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical diagnosis of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (symptoms of conjunctivitis, irritation, burning, increased lacrimation, photophobia, dryness of the eyes along with conjunctival inflammation, trichiasis, and scarring
  2. One of the following:

    • Failed response to the use of one or more conventional treatments for a minimum of 10 weeks; or
    • Minimal conventional medication doses, with a significant adverse effects, contradiction to use, or progressive disease despite treatment
  3. Adults age 19 and older
  4. Adequate renal function as indicated by serum creatinine levels less than 1.5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. known to rituximab or its components
  2. Age less than 19 years
  3. Any other condition deemed by the investigator to be a significant hazard to the subject if the therapy were initiated.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rituximab

    The Rituximab dose is 1000 mg (1gm) given as an IV infusion every two weeks for 2 doses (Days 1 and 15).

    Drug: Rituximab

Interventions

  • The Rituximab dose is 1000mg (1gm) given as an IV infusion every two weeks for 2 doses (days 1 and 15).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With no Evidence of Further Scarring (Fosters Staging) at 16 Weeks

    Stages Characteristics I Subconjunctival scarring and fibrosis II Fornix foreshortening (a-d describes % loss of inferior fornix depth) 1. 0-25% 2. 25-50% 3. 50-75% 4. 75-100% III Presence of symblepharon and number (n) (a-d describes % of horizontal involvement by symblepharons and n is the number of symblepharons countable) a. 0-25% b. 25-50% c. 50-75% d. 75-100% IV Ankyloblepharon, frozen globe

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. 2. The Proportion of Patients That Experience a Grade 3, Grade 4, or Grade 5 Toxicity Based Reaction on the NCI-CTC System at the Time of Their Infusions and During Follow-up Visits.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1. Stability of Visual Acuity (Snellen's Test) at 16 Weeks

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. 2. Stability of Visual Acuity (Snellen's Test) at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 21, 2011
Limitations and caveats
Genentech closed trial before site was able to enroll 5 patients.

Participant flow

Three patients were recruited from the investigator's practice.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRituximab
Started3
Completed3
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With no Evidence of Further Scarring (Fosters Staging) at 16 Weeks

Stages Characteristics I Subconjunctival scarring and fibrosis II Fornix foreshortening (a-d describes % loss of inferior fornix depth) 1. 0-25% 2. 25-50% 3. 50-75% 4. 75-100% III Presence of symblepharon and number (n) (a-d describes % of horizontal involvement by symblepharons and n is the number of symblepharons countable) a. 0-25% b. 25-50% c. 50-75% d. 75-100% IV Ankyloblepharon, frozen globe

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With no Evidence of Further Scarring (Fosters Staging) at 16 Weeks
participantsRituximab
Number of Participants With no Evidence of Further Scarring (Fosters Staging) at 16 Weeks0
Primary2. The Proportion of Patients That Experience a Grade 3, Grade 4, or Grade 5 Toxicity Based Reaction on the NCI-CTC System at the Time of Their Infusions and During Follow-up Visits.
Time frame:
16 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Secondary1. Stability of Visual Acuity (Snellen's Test) at 16 Weeks
Time frame:
16 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Secondary2. Stability of Visual Acuity (Snellen's Test) at 24 Weeks
Time frame:
24 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Rituximab0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Rituximab
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years2
>=65 years1
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Rituximab
Mean61 ± 28
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Rituximab
Female2
Male1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Rituximab
United States3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2006 to primary completion in Jan 2010, 48 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2011, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 26, 2007
First posted
Jan 2, 2008
StartActual
Jan 2006
Primary completionActual
Jan 2010
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2026
Results first posted
Apr 21, 2011
Last update
May 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00584935
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc., Biogen
Responsible party
Craig Elmets (Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 2, 2008
Start date
Jan 2006
Primary completion
Jan 2010
Completion
Jan 1, 2026
Results posted
Apr 21, 2011
Last update
May 4, 2026

Study contacts

Craig A Elmets
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Rituximab

Start the discussion