CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00549796Updated Sep 11, 2014

Randomized Comparison Angioplasty Outcomes at Hospitals With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery

An interventional study of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Coronary Arteriosclerosis and Angina Pectoris, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 60 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-11.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18,876
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Angioplasty is a procedure which opens blocked heart arteries using balloons and/or stents. Most U.S. states and all national heart organizations require that angioplasty be done only at hospitals that can also perform open heart surgery. The reason for this is that there is a risk that angioplasty can cause injury to the heart artery that might require open heart surgery to fix. Open heart surgery is a backup in case it is needed. The risk that open heart surgery will be needed is very small. Nevertheless, without more research, many state Departments of Health and all national heart organizations do not want to change the requirement for having on-site open heart surgery wherever angioplasty is performed. Some States already allow this; and European heart organizations already allow it, as well.

This study is designed to determine whether the safety and benefits of angioplasty are the same at hospitals that perform angioplasty either with or without open heart surgery backup.

Patient who enter the study have a heart catheterization at a hospital without a heart surgery program. If they need angioplasty, then they are randomized to either stay at the hospital without heart surgery for their angioplasty or to be transferred for the procedure to a hospital with heart surgery. For every four patients, three stay at the hospital without heart surgery and one is transferred.

The study is designed to show that there is no detectable difference between the safety and benefits of the procedure at the two types of hospital (with and without heart surgery). The cost of the procedure at the two hospital types is also compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Arteriosclerosis
  • Angina Pectoris

Keywords

  • coronary artery disease
  • angioplasty
  • stent
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • on-site cardiac surgery
  • randomized trial
03

In context

Angina Pectoris

519 studies on the registry are indexed under Angina Pectoris; 82 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18,876 is above the median of 123 across 336 interventional studies indexed under Angina Pectoris.

Browse Angina Pectoris studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,782 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pre-catheterization:

  • Must be undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization for suspected CAD
  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Must not be pregnant (negative pregnancy test) or must not be of childbearing potential must be able to give informed consent.

Post-catheterization:

  • Coronary artery disease judged to be clinically and angiographically significant
  • Ability to perform PCI with equipment available at the local site
  • Procedure risk judged to be not high (see below)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pre-catheterization:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  • Pregnancy

Post-catheterization:

  • High likelihood of requiring a device not available at the hospitals without SOS
  • No need for PCI
  • Need for coronary artery bypass surgery
  • High procedural risk (see below)

High procedural risk criteria are:

  • PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery
  • PCI of left circulation lesion in the presence of critical (>70%) unprotected left main coronary artery lesion
  • Poor left ventricular function (EF\< 20%) and need to perform PCI in a vessel supplying significant myocardium
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18,876 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    PCI performed at a hospital with co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery

    Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

  • Other
    2

    PCI performed at a hospitals without co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery

    Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Interventions

  • OtherPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

    Patients undergo routine, clinically indicated PCI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. MACE = death + MI + TVR

    Time frame: 9 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. emergency CABG

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  2. myocardial infarction

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  3. target vessel revascularization (TVR)

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  4. any subsequent revascularization (ASR)

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  5. heart failure and class

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  6. angina and class

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  7. stroke

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  8. composite adverse endpoint (MACE)

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  9. MACE = death + MI + TVR

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  10. MACE = death + MI + ASR

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  11. angiographic (end-procedure) complications (embolization, dissection, no reflow, etc)

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  12. angiographic (procedural) success (<20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow)

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  13. completeness of revascularization

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  14. percent of patients with complete or partial revascularization

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  15. bleeding (non-CABG transfusion, vascular repair)

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  16. length of stay

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  17. total direct medical cost

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

  18. major resource consumption patterns (hospital and ICU days, surgeries, hospitalizations)

    Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months

07

Study locations

60 sites
  • Crestwood Medical Center
    Huntsville, Alabama 35801, United States
  • Wellstar Cobb Hospital
    Austell, Georgia, United States
  • Southeast Georgia Health System
    Brunswick, Georgia, United States
  • Tanner Medical Center
    Carrollton, Georgia, United States
  • Hamilton Medical Center
    Dalton, Georgia 30722, United States
  • Fairview Park Hospital
    Dublin, Georgia 31021, United States
  • Spalding Regional Medical Center
    Griffin, Georgia, United States
  • West Georgia Health
    LaGrange, Georgia, United States
  • Southern Regional Medical Center
    Riverdale, Georgia, United States
  • Archbold Memorial Hospital
    Thomasville, Georgia 31792, United States
  • Tift Regional Medical Center
    Tifton, Georgia, United States
  • Little Company of Mary Hospital
    Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States
  • Advocate South Suburban Hospital
    Hazel Crest, Illinois 60429, United States
  • Anne Arundel Medical Center
    Annapolis, Maryland, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • St. Agnes Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Southern Maryland Hospital Center
    Clinton, Maryland, United States
  • Frederick Memorial Hospital
    Frederick, Maryland, United States
  • Baltimore Washington Medical Center
    Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
  • Meritus Medical Center
    Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
  • Shady Grove Adventist Hospital
    Rockville, Maryland, United States
  • Holy Cross Hospital
    Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
  • Bayonne Medical Center
    Bayonne, New Jersey 07002, United States
  • Clara Maas Medical Center
    Belleville, New Jersey, United States
  • JFK Medical Center
    Edison, New Jersey, United States
  • Trinitas Hospital
    Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
  • Virtua-West Jersey Hospital Marlton
    Evesham, New Jersey, United States
  • Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center
    Hamilton, New Jersey, United States
  • Monmouth Medical Center
    Long Branch, New Jersey, United States
  • Raritan Bay Medical Center
    Perth Amboy, New Jersey, United States
  • Riverview Medical Center
    Red Bank, New Jersey, United States
  • Somerset Medical Center
    Somerville, New Jersey, United States
  • Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center
    South Plainfield, New Jersey, United States
  • Overlook Medical Center
    Summit, New Jersey, United States
  • Holy Name Hospital
    Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
  • Community Medical Center
    Toms River, New Jersey, United States
  • Duke Health Raleigh Hospital
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27609, United States
  • Rowan Regional Medical Center
    Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
  • Community Health and Wellness Center
    Bryan, Ohio 43506, United States
  • University Hospitals Case Medical Center / Geauga Medical Center
    Chardon, Ohio, United States
  • University Hospital East Ohio State University Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Southview Medical Center
    Dayton, Ohio, United States
  • Fort Hamilton Hospital
    Fort Hamilton, Ohio, United States
  • Marietta Memorial Hospital
    Marietta, Ohio, United States
  • Knox Community Hospital
    Mount Vernon, Ohio, United States
  • Licking Memorial Hospital
    Newark, Ohio, United States
  • Southern Ohio Medical Center
    Portsmouth, Ohio, United States
  • Mt. Carmel St. Ann's Hospital
    Westerville, Ohio, United States
  • Legacy Meridian Park Hospital
    Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Sacred Heart Hospital
    Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Chambersburg Hospital
    Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Armstrong County Memorial Hospital
    Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Evangelical Community Hospital
    Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • UPMC McKeesport
    McKeesport, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Meadville Medical Center
    Meadville, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Monongahela Valley Hospital
    Monongahela, Pennsylvania, United States
  • West Chester Hospital
    West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Memorial Hospital
    York, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Kingwood Medical Center
    Kingwood, Texas, United States
  • Mainland Medical Center
    Texas City, Texas, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hiremath PG, Aversano T, Spertus JA, Lemmon CC, Naiman DQ, Czarny MJ. Sex Differences in Health Status and Clinical Outcomes After Nonprimary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011308. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011308. Epub 2022 Jan 23. PubMed 35067071 ↗
  • Aversano T, Lemmon CC, Liu L; Atlantic CPORT Investigators. Outcomes of PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1792-802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114540. Epub 2012 Mar 25. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1650. PubMed 22443460 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00549796
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
Duke University, Maryland Medical Research Institute
Responsible party
Thomas Aversano (Associate Professor of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2007
Start date
Apr 2006
Primary completion
Feb 2012
Completion
Feb 2012
Last update
Sep 11, 2014

Study contacts

Thomas Aversano, MD
study director · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion