An interventional study of Cytology Specimen Collection Procedure and Diagnostic Microscopy in Erythroplakia, Fanconi Anemia and Lichen Planus, sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.
Sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This clinical trial studies widefield fluorescence and reflectance imaging, fluorescence spectroscopy, and tissue samples in regularly examining (monitoring) participants at risk for developing oral cancer. All tissue and cells are made of tiny particles. Some of these particles give off small amounts of light. This light is called fluorescence. Fluorescent imaging use instruments that shine different wavelengths (colors) of light in the mouth taking fluorescence pictures through a portable head light or by taking fluorescent and reflectance pictures through a dental microscope using a digital camera. Fluorescent spectroscopy uses a small probe placed gently against the lining of the mouth and the tissue is exposed to small amounts of fluorescent light that is then collected with a special camera and a computer to be analyzed. Checking mouth tissue samples under a microscope may also help detect abnormal cells. Diagnostic procedures, such as fluorescence and reflectance imaging, fluorescence spectroscopy imaging, and tissue samples, may help doctors detect pre-cancer or early cancer when it may be easier to treat.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare images of oral mucosa, obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation, to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression.
OUTLINE:
Participants' oral cavities are inspected by a clinician using a standard white light headlamp. Participants then undergo oral mucosa examination using wide-field reflectance and fluorescence imaging, and/or fluorescence spectroscopy imaging. Standard oral brush biopsies are also performed and examined microscopically. Participants may undergo repeated imaging procedures and biopsy during subsequent follow up visits.
95 studies on the registry are indexed under Fanconi Anemia; 20 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 338 is above the median of 21 across 61 interventional studies indexed under Fanconi Anemia.
Browse Fanconi Anemia studies →M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 3,047 studies on the registry; 578 are open to participants now.
Of its 612 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 409 (67%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants' oral cavities are inspected by a clinician using a standard white light headlamp. Participants then undergo oral mucosa examination using wide-field reflectance and fluorescence imaging, and/or fluorescence spectroscopy imaging. Standard oral brush biopsies are also performed and examined microscopically. Participants may undergo repeated imaging procedures and biopsy during subsequent follow up visits.
Other: Cytology Specimen Collection Procedure · Procedure: Diagnostic Microscopy · Procedure: Diagnostic Procedure · Procedure: Fluorescence Imaging · Procedure: Fluorescence Spectroscopy
Undergo oral tissue collection
Also known as: Cytologic Sampling
Mouth tissue examined microscopically for cytologic features
Undergo standard white light headlamp oral examination
Also known as: Diagnostic Method, Diagnostic Technique, Diagnostic Test
Undergo widefield fluorescent and reflectance imaging
Undergo point fluorescent spectroscopy
Also known as: Spectroscopy, Fluorescence
Lesions diagnosed via wide-field fluorescence imaging
Oral mucosa obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation will be compared to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression. Diagnostic methods will be compared with each other by forming 2x2 tables and computing the chi-square statistics for the McNemar test. Kappa statistic will also be calculated for comparing the chance corrected agreement between various diagnostic methods.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Lesions diagnosed via point spectroscopy system
Oral mucosa obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation will be compared to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression. Diagnostic methods will be compared with each other by forming 2x2 tables and computing the chi-square statistics for the McNemar test. Kappa statistic will also be calculated for comparing the chance corrected agreement between various diagnostic methods.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Lesions diagnosed via non-invasive brush cytology
Oral mucosa obtained at various wavelength combinations including 350 nm, 380 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm excitation will be compared to standard white light images, pathologic analysis of any biopsied tissue when available, and carcinogenic progression. Diagnostic methods will be compared with each other by forming 2x2 tables and computing the chi-square statistics for the McNemar test. Kappa statistic will also be calculated for comparing the chance corrected agreement between various diagnostic methods.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Started Aug 2007 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 236 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.