CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00529958Updated Dec 11, 2024Results posted

Comparison of Three Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

An interventional study of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, Deficiency of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Chronic Instability of Knee, sponsored by University of Calgary. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-11.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the difference in quality of life outcome at two years, in patients undergoing an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedure with either a patellar tendon, quadruple hamstring tendon or a double-bundle hamstring tendon autograft.

Read the detailed description

Following an ACL injury, the knee is predisposed to chronic instability, further damage to the meniscal and chondral structures in the knee, osteoarthritis and an impaired quality of life. The successful treatment of an ACL deficient knee aims to preserve the intact meniscus and chondral structures, and to provide a functionally stable knee so that patients can return to pre-injury activities and restore their quality of life. The current standard of care for ACL deficient knees is with a surgical ACL reconstruction procedure. A Cochrane Review was done and demonstrated that the existing literature is controversial. To date, no existing trial has used validated patient-based outcome assessment, accounted for the critical differences between acute and chronic ACL deficiency or used modern techniques to ensure randomization concealment and a sufficient sample size to avoid type II error. The existing information does not define graft failure or re-ruptures, involve long-term follow-up to address osteoarthritis development, nor compare outcomes between single- and double-bundle reconstructive techniques. The current standard includes either a patellar tendon or quadruple semitendinosus/gracilis tendon autograft reconstruction. The newest option is a double-bundle semitendinosus/gracilis graft. This option attempts to restore the complex ACL anatomy by using two separate tendon components to reconstruct the ACL. This study will measure disease-specific quality of life at short- and long-term post-operative intervals (1, 2, 5 and 10 years). Additional secondary outcomes, including the incidence of traumatic re-ruptures and graft failures, will also be compared between treatment groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
  • Deficiency of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
  • Chronic Instability of Knee
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Keywords

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction
  • Patellar Tendon
  • Hamstring Tendon
  • Double-Bundle
  • Autograft
03

In context

Rupture

557 studies on the registry are indexed under Rupture; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 330 is above the median of 72 across 334 interventional studies indexed under Rupture.

Browse Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A confirmed diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency based on all of the following:

  • History of a traumatic injury episode
  • Physical examination findings of increased anterior translation of the tibia on the femur (Lachman test and/or anterior drawer test)
  • A positive pivot shift test
  • X-rays showing skeletal maturity (ie: tibial tubercle fused) and no fractures. (NB: Magnetic resonance imaging is not required)
  • Age 14-50 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with combined ligament deficiencies (Posterior Cruciate, Medial and/or Lateral Collateral deficiency.) (NB: Grade 1 side to side differences (ie. \< 5mm) on valgus, varus or posterior stress testing will not be considered exclusions)
  • Intra-operative identification of International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Grade 4 chondral lesion of > 1 cm ² [61]
  • Previous ligament surgery on the affected or contralateral knees
  • Cases involving litigation or Worker's Compensation
  • Confirmed connective tissue disorder (ie: Ehlers-Danlos, Marfans)
  • X-ray showing that tibial physis is not fused
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
330 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Patellar Tendon (PT)

    ACL reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft

    Procedure: Patellar Tendon

  • Active comparator
    Hamstring (HT)

    ACL reconstruction using a quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis (hamstring) tendon single-bundle autograft

    Procedure: Hamstring Tendon

  • Active comparator
    Double-Bundle (DB)

    ACL reconstruction using a semitendinosus/gracilis (hamstring) tendon double-bundle autograft

    Procedure: Double-Bundle

Interventions

  • ProcedurePatellar Tendon

    Patellar Tendon autograft

    Also known as: Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, BTPB graft

  • ProcedureHamstring Tendon

    Quadruple Semitendinosus/Gracilis (Hamstring) Tendon Autograft

    Also known as: Single-bundle hamstring graft, ST/G graft

  • ProcedureDouble-Bundle

    Double-Bundle Semitendinosus/Gracilis (Hamstring) Tendon Autograft

    Also known as: Double-bundle ST/G graft

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) Outcome

    The 32-item patient-reported Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality-of-Life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire assesses symptoms/physical complaints, work-related, sports/recreational, lifestyle and social/emotional concerns. A higher score on the 0 to 100mm visual analog scale represents better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Traumatic ACL Re-ruptures and Atraumatic Graft Failures

    * COMPLETE TRAUMATIC RE-RUPTURE - defined as a consequence of an acute traumatic event resulting in a change in static stability since the most recent follow-up visit; determined clinically by a definite loss of end point on Lachman testing, increased anterior translation (\>3mm) and a greater than or equal grade 2 pivot shift. Confirmed by MRI or diagnostic arthroscopy. * PARTIAL TRAUMATIC TEARS - defined as a consequence of an acute traumatic event resulting in a suspected meniscal injury or graft tear on history, without the clinical characteristics of a "complete traumatic rerupture". Confirmed by MR or diagnostic arthroscopy. * TRAUMATIC RE-INJURY - combined total of "complete traumatic re-ruptures" and "partial traumatic tears". * ATRAUMATIC GRAFT FAILURES - defined in the absence of an acute traumatic event, with greater than or equal grade 2 pivot shift and/or greater than or equal to 6mm side-to-side difference on the KT arthrometer.

    Time frame: Minimum 2-year Follow-up, 5-Year Follow-up, 10-Year Follow-up

  2. Number of Participants With Each International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Overall Group Grade

    IKDC Objective group grades: Normal (A), Nearly Normal (B), Abnormal (C), Severely Abnormal (D) The IKDC Objective Overall Group Grade is determined by the lowest grade assigned to defined objective knee examination measurements, including effusion, passive motion deficit and manual/instrumented ligament examinations (i.e. Lachman, anterior-posterior (AP) translation).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 5 years post-operatively

  3. Mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Score

    Patient-reported health-related outcome measure with a score between 0 and 100. A higher score represents a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively

  4. Number of Participants With Each Pivot Shift Grade

    The Pivot Shift test is a dynamic, passive test to assess the rotational instability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the knee. Pivot shift grades include: equal/0 (negative); glide/1; clunk/2; gross/3. A positive grade indicates injury to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively

  5. Proportion of Patients With Moderate or Severe Kneeling Pain

    Patients kneeled down on the same hard surface (i.e. clinic floor) and self-reported the pain on a scale of: none, mild, moderate or severe. The number of patients reporting moderate or severe kneeling pain were combined in the reported proportions.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 and 5 years post-operatively

  6. Knee Laxity as Measured by the KT Arthrometer

    Mean side-to-side differences, as measured using the KT-1000 Arthrometer instrument at 30lbs/134N forces to objectively measure knee laxity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years post-operatively

  7. Mean Tegner Activity Level

    Tegner Activity Scale (Values indicate level of activity from inactive (Level 0) to competitive level of activity (Level 10))

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 and 2 years post-operatively

  8. Return to Pre-injury Tegner Activity Level

    Proportion of patients returning to pre-injury levels, as measured by the Tegner Activity Scale (Values indicate level of activity from inactive (Level 0) to competitive level of activity (Level 10)).

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively

  9. Cincinnati Occupational Rating Scale

    The Cincinnati Occupational Rating Scale assesses the level of work-related activities, including sitting, standing, walking, squatting, climbing, lifting and carrying weighted objects. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a lower score representing more sedentary work-related activities.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively

  10. Skin-to-Skin Operative Times

    Skin-to-skin operative times (in minutes) for each ACL reconstruction procedure

    Time frame: During surgery

  11. Radiographic (X-ray) Changes

    The analysis for the radiographic assessment data is currently ongoing, to provide a comparison of baseline, 2- and 5-year post-operative x-rays.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 and 5 years post-operatively

Other outcomes

  1. Complications of the Surgical Procedure (See Adverse Events Section for Results of This Outcome)

    All complications/adverse events that occurred within the first two-years post-operatively. See Adverse Events section for results of this outcome.

    Time frame: 2 years post-operatively

07

Results

Posted Feb 20, 2019

Participant flow

2-Year Follow-up
Participant flow — 2-Year Follow-up
MilestonePatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Started110110110
Completed106108108
Not completed422
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up122
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject300
5-Year Follow-up
Participant flow — 5-Year Follow-up
MilestonePatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Started106108108
Completed103105107
Not completed331
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up231
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) Outcome

The 32-item patient-reported Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality-of-Life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire assesses symptoms/physical complaints, work-related, sports/recreational, lifestyle and social/emotional concerns. A higher score on the 0 to 100mm visual analog scale represents better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Score (0 to 100)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) Outcome
Score (0 to 100)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline27.0 ± 13.129.8 ± 14.728.7 ± 13.7
3 Months47.7 ± 17.252.6 ± 19.250.5 ± 16.9
6 Months61.7 ± 19.165.2 ± 18.465.5 ± 17.9
1-Year74.5 ± 18.775.4 ± 18.573.6 ± 19.2
2-Years84.6 ± 16.682.5 ± 17.782.4 ± 17.5
5-Years82.5 ± 17.983.9 ± 18.281.1 ± 19.3
Statistical analysis
  • Patellar Tendon (PT) vs Hamstring (HT) vs Double-Bundle (DB) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 (A Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons was used in the sample size calculation, resulting in 90 patients per group. With a 20% lost-to-follow-up rate, the final sample size was 108 patients per group for a total of 324 patients.)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Traumatic ACL Re-ruptures and Atraumatic Graft Failures

* COMPLETE TRAUMATIC RE-RUPTURE - defined as a consequence of an acute traumatic event resulting in a change in static stability since the most recent follow-up visit; determined clinically by a definite loss of end point on Lachman testing, increased anterior translation (\>3mm) and a greater than or equal grade 2 pivot shift. Confirmed by MRI or diagnostic arthroscopy. * PARTIAL TRAUMATIC TEARS - defined as a consequence of an acute traumatic event resulting in a suspected meniscal injury or graft tear on history, without the clinical characteristics of a "complete traumatic rerupture". Confirmed by MR or diagnostic arthroscopy. * TRAUMATIC RE-INJURY - combined total of "complete traumatic re-ruptures" and "partial traumatic tears". * ATRAUMATIC GRAFT FAILURES - defined in the absence of an acute traumatic event, with greater than or equal grade 2 pivot shift and/or greater than or equal to 6mm side-to-side difference on the KT arthrometer.

Time frame:
Minimum 2-year Follow-up, 5-Year Follow-up, 10-Year Follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Traumatic ACL Re-ruptures and Atraumatic Graft Failures
ParticipantsPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Minimum 2-Year Follow-up — No re-injury or failure918179
Minimum 2-Year Follow-up — Complete Traumatic Re-rupture377
Minimum 2-Year Follow-up — Partial Traumatic Tear054
Minimum 2-Year Follow-up — Atraumatic Graft Failure161720
5-Year Follow-up — No re-injury or failure928076
5-Year Follow-up — Complete Traumatic Re-rupture41111
5-Year Follow-up — Partial Traumatic Tear056
5-Year Follow-up — Atraumatic Graft Failure7914
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Each International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Overall Group Grade

IKDC Objective group grades: Normal (A), Nearly Normal (B), Abnormal (C), Severely Abnormal (D) The IKDC Objective Overall Group Grade is determined by the lowest grade assigned to defined objective knee examination measurements, including effusion, passive motion deficit and manual/instrumented ligament examinations (i.e. Lachman, anterior-posterior (AP) translation).

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 2, 5 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Each International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Overall Group Grade
ParticipantsPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline — Normal (A)000
Baseline — Nearly Normal (B)145
Baseline — Abnormal (C)103101100
Baseline — Severely Abnormal (D)545
1-Year — Normal (A)999
1-Year — Nearly Normal (B)797771
1-Year — Abnormal (C)131819
1-Year — Severely Abnormal (D)002
2-Years — Normal (A)121219
2-Years — Nearly Normal (B)656256
2-Years — Abnormal (C)232830
2-Years — Severely Abnormal (D)122
5-Years — Normal (A)241819
5-Years — Nearly Normal (B)616358
5-Years — Abnormal (C)131824
5-Years — Severely Abnormal (D)002
SecondaryMean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Score

Patient-reported health-related outcome measure with a score between 0 and 100. A higher score represents a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (out of 100)
Mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Score
score on a scale (out of 100)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline50.1 ± 13.951.0 ± 16.251.5 ± 14.6
3 Months60.2 ± 12.265.7 ± 14.263.1 ± 12.1
6 Months71.1 ± 11.176.1 ± 13.175.8 ± 11.1
1-Year79.7 ± 11.781.7 ± 12.680.0 ± 11.9
2-Years84.6 ± 13.885.3 ± 11.684.2 ± 11.8
5-Years83.9 ± 12.985.2 ± 13.084.3 ± 13.4
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Each Pivot Shift Grade

The Pivot Shift test is a dynamic, passive test to assess the rotational instability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the knee. Pivot shift grades include: equal/0 (negative); glide/1; clunk/2; gross/3. A positive grade indicates injury to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Each Pivot Shift Grade
ParticipantsPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline — Equal010
Baseline — Glide (+)669
Baseline — Clunk (++)10310299
Baseline — Gross (+++)112
3 Months — Equal736080
3 Months — Glide (+)304525
3 Months — Clunk (++)112
3 Months — Gross (+++)000
6 Months — Equal625366
6 Months — Glide (+)384539
6 Months — Clunk (++)352
6 Months — Gross (+++)000
1-Year — Equal474653
1-Year — Glide (+)514841
1-Year — Clunk (++)3127
1-Year — Gross (+++)001
2-Years — Equal362838
2-Years — Glide (+)525749
2-Years — Clunk (++)141819
2-Years — Gross (+++)011
5-Years — Equal372930
5-Years — Glide (+)505450
5-Years — Clunk (++)121622
5-Years — Gross (+++)001
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Moderate or Severe Kneeling Pain

Patients kneeled down on the same hard surface (i.e. clinic floor) and self-reported the pain on a scale of: none, mild, moderate or severe. The number of patients reporting moderate or severe kneeling pain were combined in the reported proportions.

Time frame:
Baseline, 2 and 5 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients With Moderate or Severe Kneeling Pain
ParticipantsPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline292918
2 Years1794
5 Years1042
SecondaryKnee Laxity as Measured by the KT Arthrometer

Mean side-to-side differences, as measured using the KT-1000 Arthrometer instrument at 30lbs/134N forces to objectively measure knee laxity.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 and 2 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Millimetres (side-to-side difference)
Knee Laxity as Measured by the KT Arthrometer
Millimetres (side-to-side difference)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline4.9 ± 2.35.0 ± 2.15.1 ± 2.3
1-Year1.9 ± 2.32.8 ± 1.82.8 ± 2.2
2-Years1.9 ± 2.53.0 ± 2.12.7 ± 2.4
SecondaryMean Tegner Activity Level

Tegner Activity Scale (Values indicate level of activity from inactive (Level 0) to competitive level of activity (Level 10))

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 1 and 2 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Activity Level
Mean Tegner Activity Level
Activity LevelPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline7.7 ± 1.77.9 ± 1.77.9 ± 1.6
6 Months4.7 ± 1.64.8 ± 1.65.0 ± 1.7
1 Year6.0 ± 1.86.1 ± 1.95.9 ± 2.0
2 Years6.5 ± 1.86.4 ± 2.06.4 ± 1.9
SecondaryReturn to Pre-injury Tegner Activity Level

Proportion of patients returning to pre-injury levels, as measured by the Tegner Activity Scale (Values indicate level of activity from inactive (Level 0) to competitive level of activity (Level 10)).

Time frame:
1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Return to Pre-injury Tegner Activity Level
ParticipantsPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
1 Year273328
2 Years444336
5 Years354141
SecondaryCincinnati Occupational Rating Scale

The Cincinnati Occupational Rating Scale assesses the level of work-related activities, including sitting, standing, walking, squatting, climbing, lifting and carrying weighted objects. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a lower score representing more sedentary work-related activities.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (out of 100)
Cincinnati Occupational Rating Scale
score on a scale (out of 100)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Baseline36.6 ± 19.935.4 ± 21.336.3 ± 17.7
3 Months34.7 ± 17.236.1 ± 22.136.4 ± 19.3
6 Months35.7 ± 18.337.4 ± 21.637.0 ± 20.2
1 Year36.7 ± 17.238.0 ± 22.038.0 ± 21.5
2 Years36.8 ± 19.434.4 ± 22.138.0 ± 22.5
5 Years35.9 ± 18.436.6 ± 23.837.8 ± 24.2
SecondarySkin-to-Skin Operative Times

Skin-to-skin operative times (in minutes) for each ACL reconstruction procedure

Time frame:
During surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes
Skin-to-Skin Operative Times
MinutesPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Skin-to-Skin Operative Times75.3 ± 14.767.8 ± 14.688.0 ± 14.9
SecondaryRadiographic (X-ray) Changes

The analysis for the radiographic assessment data is currently ongoing, to provide a comparison of baseline, 2- and 5-year post-operative x-rays.

Time frame:
Baseline, 2 and 5 years post-operatively

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedComplications of the Surgical Procedure (See Adverse Events Section for Results of This Outcome)

All complications/adverse events that occurred within the first two-years post-operatively. See Adverse Events section for results of this outcome.

Time frame:
2 years post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Complications of the Surgical Procedure (See Adverse Events Section for Results of This Outcome)
ParticipantsPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Deep wound infection100
Superficial wound infection022
Chondral lesion101
Failed meniscal repair264
Stiffness423
Hamstring injury1612
Tibial periostitis124
Stitch abscess210
Cellulitis003
Meniscal cyst100
Patellar tendinopathy100
Persistent effusion / inflammation125
Sensory nerve problems413
Wound dehiscence101
Hardware issues000
Massive pulmonary embolism001
Deep vein thrombosis001
Septic arthritis010

Adverse events

Collected over Two years post-operatively.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patellar Tendon (PT)0/110 (0%)0/110 (0%)20/110 (18.2%)
Hamstring (HT)0/110 (0%)1/110 (0.9%)22/110 (20%)
Double-Bundle (DB)0/110 (0%)2/110 (1.8%)38/110 (34.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Septic ArthritisInfections and infestations0/1101/1100/110
Massive Pulmonary EmbolismBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1100/1101/110
Deep Vein ThrombosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1100/1101/110
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventPatellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)
Hamstring InjuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1106/11012/110
Failed Meniscal RepairMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1106/1104/110
Persistent Effusion/InflammationMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1102/1105/110
StiffnessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/1102/1103/110
Tibial PeriostitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1102/1104/110
Sensory Nerve ProblemsNervous system disorders4/1101/1103/110
CellulitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1100/1103/110
Superficial Wound InfectionInfections and infestations0/1102/1102/110
Stitch AbscessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1101/1100/110
Deep Wound InfectionInfections and infestations1/1100/1100/110

Baseline characteristics

N=110 patients were randomized to each study group. One cross-over from the DB group received an HT graft, but was analyzed as part of the DB study group.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)Total
Mean28.7 ± 9.728.5 ± 9.928.3 ± 9.828.5 ± 9.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)Total
Female475149147
Male635961183
Chronicity: Acute, Chronic
Chronicity: Acute, Chronic(Participants)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)Total
Acute16161749
Chronic949493281
Injured side: Left, Right
Injured side: Left, Right(Participants)Patellar Tendon (PT)Hamstring (HT)Double-Bundle (DB)Total
Left546354171
Right564756159
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mohtadi N. Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1998 May-Jun;26(3):350-9. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260030201. PubMed 9617395 ↗
  • Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD005960. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005960.pub2. PubMed 21901700 ↗
  • Mohtadi N, Barber R, Chan D, Paolucci EO. Complications and Adverse Events of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3 Graft Types for ACL Reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2016 May;26(3):182-9. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000202. PubMed 25881568 ↗
  • Mohtadi N, Chan D, Barber R, Oddone Paolucci E. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions: Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes at a Minimal 2-Year Follow-up. Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):321-31. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000165. PubMed 25514139 ↗
  • Mohtadi N, Chan D, Barber R, Paolucci EO. Reruptures, Reinjuries, and Revisions at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3 Graft Types for ACL Reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2016 Mar;26(2):96-107. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000209. PubMed 26164058 ↗
  • Mohtadi NG, Chan DS. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions: Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jun 5;101(11):949-960. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01322. PubMed 31169571 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00529958
Lead sponsor
University of Calgary
Collaborators
Workers' Compensation Board, Alberta
Responsible party
Dr. Nicholas Mohtadi (Clinical Professor and Orthopaedic Surgeon, University of Calgary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2007
Start date
Sep 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Sep 2023
Results posted
Feb 20, 2019
Last update
Dec 11, 2024

Study contacts

Nicholas G Mohtadi, MD MSc FRCSC
principal investigator · University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion