ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00498485Updated May 19, 2016Results posted

Use of Xyrem to Improve Sleep in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

A Phase 4 interventional study of Placebo and Sodium Oxybate in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, sponsored by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-19.

Sponsored by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Withdrawal of support.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic fatigue syndrome is a disabling illness for which there is no specific treatment. As a group, CFS patients have disturbed sleep with frequent arousals and the sense of not having slept upon awakening. Xyrem (Sodium oxybate) is known to improve deep sleep and so may reduce the sleep disturbances of CFS leading to better sleep with less fatigue. Its ability to produce the rapid onset of deep sleep is a reason it became a street drug, but its availability is currently limited via distribution through a single centralized pharmacy. Xyrem has been successfully used based on results from a study on patients with fibromyalgia (FM), an ailment closely resembling CFS. However, in that study, the researchers provided no information as to whether patients had FM alone or FM plus CFS. Thus, it is not clear from this study just which patient may be helped. I have prescribed Xyrem for patients who have both FM and CFS with good results. In this study, funded by the company that makes Xyrem, I propose testing the drug's efficacy on patients with CFS alone - that is, they do not have fibromyalgia.

Volunteers for this study will complete paper and pencil questionnaires about their symptoms as well as a computerized test to assess their degree of brain fog. They will then be randomly assigned to one of two groups, placebo or drug. Volunteers will not know what group they are in until the end of the study. Only the drug group will receive the medication. The placebo group will receive a substance that looks identical to the real medicine but with no active ingredients. The medication comes as a liquid and patients will start taking an initial dose about 30 min before they expect to sleep. If subjects awaken after less than 5 hrs of sleep, they will take a second dose. If they sleep more than 5 hrs, they will be told to skip taking the second dose. We will call patients weekly to see how they are doing on the "drug." If they have tolerable side effects or report significant improvement, we will maintain the dose. But if patients report no effect of treatment, the dosage will be incremented by 1 ml per week until good sleep is achieved or a predetermined maximum is reached.

Read the detailed description

Medically unexplained fatigue occurs in about 5% of the population with 10% of that number fulfilling formal case definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome1. Medically unexplained fatigue is a major problem for both patient and practitioner - for both because there is no effective FDA-approved treatment for the symptom. One major problem for these patients is unrefreshing sleep. Formal sleep studies show reduced total sleep time and reduced sleep efficiency compared to controls.2;3 We are currently in the early stages of an NIH-funded grant designed to study cytokines during sleep. Preliminary results support awake time for patients relative to controls, producing a decreased sleep efficiency. These data lead to our working hypothesis that the problem of severe daytime fatigue is due to a previously unappreciated form of sleep pathology related to sleep fragmentation.

Patients with medically unexplained pain also complain of disturbed sleep. Sodium oxybate has been tested on patients with this complaint who fulfill a formal case definition for fibromyalgia and has found to reduce symptoms and improve sleep quality.4 Specifically, six of 7 pain/fatigue scores (overall pain, pain at rest, pain during movement, end of day fatigue, overall fatigue, and morning fatigue) were relieved by 29% to 33% with sodium oxybate, compared with 6% to 10% relief with placebo (p \< 0.005). Alpha intrusion indicative of disturbed sleep, sleep latency, and rapid-eye-movement sleep were significantly decreased, while slow-wave (stage 3/4) sleep was significantly increased, compared with placebo (p \< 0.005). Two of the 5 subjective sleep related variables were significantly different from placebo: morning alertness (improved by 18% with sodium oxybate, compared with 2% for placebo; p = 0.0033) and quality of sleep (improved by 33% and 10%, respectively; p = 0.0003).

Importantly, approximately 40% of patients in my study group fulfill case definitions simultaneously for CFS and FM. Since we do not know if patients in either sodium oxybate treatment trial had CFS, we cannot be sure whether efficacy was specific for FM or instead may have occurred due to the fact that a large representation of CFS had occurred.

An unpublished Phase II randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial in FM, done by Jon Russell and colleagues in Dallas and presented at the 2005 meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, reported substantial symptom improvement with statistically significant benefits in self reported pain scales and patient global impression of improvement at both doses of sodium oxybate tested compared with placebo [4.5g [9ml] total dose per night; p=0.005 and 6g [12 ml], p=0.048]. Improvement in outcome variables was 34.5% at the 4.5g and 27.3% at the 6g compared to 12.5% in the placebo group.

I have prescribed sodium oxybate in my own practice for patients who have both CFS and FM with good results. Anecdotally, patients reporting less pain also reported better quality sleep and less fatigue upon awakening. This has led me to hypothesize that sodium oxybate will reduce fatigue in patients with CFS alone (i.e., without also having FM).

To test this hypothesis, I propose doing a double blind, placebo controlled trial of sodium oxybate in 30 patients who fulfill a formal case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome and who do not also have FM.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Keywords

  • chronic
  • fatigue
  • pain
  • sleep
  • xyrem
  • must have chronic fatigue syndrome
  • no hypertension
  • no sleep apnea
03

In context

Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

255 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic; 59 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 60 across 171 interventional studies indexed under Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic.

Browse Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey is the lead sponsor of 105 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • I have CFS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • I do not meet the above criteria
  • I have a lifelong history of fatigue
  • I have Fibromyalgia
  • I have hypertension
  • I am pregnant or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Patients were randomized and these received placebo

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Sodium Oxybate

    Patients were randomized and these received the active drug

    Drug: Sodium Oxybate

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo

    Subjects will be randomly assigned to either placebo or drug. The medication and the placebo come as a liquid and patients will start taking an initial dose about 30 min before they expect to sleep. If subjects awaken after less than 5 hrs of sleep, they will take a second dose. If they sleep more than 5 hrs, they will skip the second dose. We will call patients weekly to see how they are doing . If they have tolerable side effects or report significant improvement, we will maintain the dose. But if patients report no effect, the dosage will be incremented by 1 ml per week until good sleep is achieved or a predetermined maximum is reached.

  • Subjects will be randomly assigned to either placebo or drug. The medication and the placebo come as a liquid and patients will start taking an initial dose about 30 min before they expect to sleep. If subjects awaken after less than 5 hrs of sleep, they will take a second dose. If they sleep more than 5 hrs, they will skip the second dose. We will call patients weekly to see how they are doing . If they have tolerable side effects or report significant improvement, we will maintain the dose. But if patients report no effect, the dosage will be incremented by 1 ml per week until good sleep is achieved or a predetermined maximum is reached.

    Also known as: Xyrem

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global Assessment of Change

    A count was made of subject responses on a Patient Assessment of Change questionnaire where scores went from +2 \[much better\] thru 0 \[no change\] to -2 \[much worse\]

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Self Reported Assessment of Sleep

    Subjects were asked to provide their input as to the quality of their sleep over the past week

    Time frame: Assessed at week 6

07

Results

Posted Apr 21, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Too few subjects to get any definitive data. Based on the preliminary data analysis done with available subjects, we infer that had we completed the study, we might have found a significant effect for drug treated over placebo treated subjects.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboXyrem
Started710
Completed65
Not completed15
Withdrew: Adverse event15

Outcome measures

PrimaryGlobal Assessment of Change

A count was made of subject responses on a Patient Assessment of Change questionnaire where scores went from +2 \[much better\] thru 0 \[no change\] to -2 \[much worse\]

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Global Assessment of Change
participantsPlaceboDrug Treated
Global Assessment of Change65
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Drug Treated · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.04
PrimarySelf Reported Assessment of Sleep

Subjects were asked to provide their input as to the quality of their sleep over the past week

Time frame:
Assessed at week 6

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—0/7 (0%)1/7 (14.3%)
Xyrem—0/10 (0%)5/10 (50%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboXyrem
Gastric upsetGastrointestinal disorders1/75/10

Baseline characteristics

No info available

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PlaceboXyremTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years71017
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboXyremTotal
Female71017
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PlaceboXyremTotal
United States71017
Initial illness severity rating
Initial illness severity rating(participants)PlaceboXyremTotal
Number71017
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UMDNJ - Pain & Fatigue Study Center, ADMC 1618
    Newark, New Jersey 07101, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2007, a primary completion of Dec 2008 and a completion of Dec 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2016, 7 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 2, 2007
First posted
Jul 10, 2007
Start
May 2007
Primary completionActual
Dec 2008
CompletionActual
Dec 2008
Results first posted
Apr 21, 2016
Last update
May 19, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00498485
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2007
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Results posted
Apr 21, 2016
Last update
May 19, 2016

Study contacts

Benjamin Natelson, MD
principal investigator · Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sodium Oxybate

Start the discussion