ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00421928Updated Apr 18, 2012Results posted

Tapentadol (CG5503)

A Phase 3 interventional study of oxycodone and placebo in Osteoarthritis, Knee and Pain, sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.. Completed. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-18.

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,030
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety of orally administered tapentadol (CG5503) Extended Release (ER) (base) at doses of 100-250 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee, in comparison with placebo and Oxycodone Controlled Release (CR).

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this randomized (study medication assigned to patients by chance), double-blind (neither patient nor investigator knows the study medication) , phase III, placebo and active controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered tapentadol (CG5503) Extended Release (ER) (base) at doses of 100-250 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain from osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The study is being conducted for registration and approval of tapentadol (CG5503) in the US and outside the US. The trial will consist of five periods: screening (to assess eligibility) , washout (3-7 days with determination of a baseline pain intensity), titration (of dose over 3 weeks to the optimal individual level) , maintenance (investigational drug intake for 12 weeks with adjustments allowed), and follow-up (2 weeks post treatment discontinuation). The study hypothesis is that the study drug will be more effective than placebo in reducing patients pain intensity. The Secondary objectives include the collection of pharmacokinetic (related to how the body uses the drug) information for dose verification. The trial objectives will be assessed by comparing the baseline pain level to the level of week 12 of the maintenance phase. This will be done by looking at the patient's pain diary information. Titrate tapentadol (CG5503) ER (extended release) 50mg to patient's optimal dose ranging between 100mg and 250mg twice a day; Oxycodone CR (controlled release) 10mg to 50mg twice a day; Placebo (no active ingredients). All doses of trial treatment will be taken orally with approximately 120 mL of water with or without food for a maximum timeframe of 15 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Pain

Keywords

  • Chronic Pain
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • tapentadol
  • Pain Assessment
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,391 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 628 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,030 is above the median of 69 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. is the lead sponsor of 465 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and functional capacity class of I-III
  • patients taking analgesic medications for at least 3 months prior to screening and/or dissatisfied with their current therapy
  • Patients requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of opioid-based analgesic, equivalent to \<160 mg of oral morphine
  • baseline score of greater than or equal to 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale, calculated as the average pain intensity during the last 3 days prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of alcohol and/or drug abuse in Investigator's judgement
  • history of significant liver insufficiency
  • chronic hepatitis B or C, or HIV, presence of active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months
  • life-long history of seizure disorder or epilepsy
  • history of malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell carcinoma that has been successfully treated
  • uncontrolled hypertension
  • patients with severely impaired renal function
  • patients with moderate to severly impaired hepatic function or with laboratory values reflecting inadequate hepatic function
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,030 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    001

    tapentadol (CG5503) 50 100 150 200 250mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks

    Drug: tapentadol (CG5503)

  • Active comparator
    002

    oxycodone 10 20 30 40 50mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks

    Drug: oxycodone

  • Placebo comparator
    003

    placebo matching placebo twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • 10, 20, 30, 40, 50mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks

  • Drugplacebo

    matching placebo twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks

  • 50, 100, 150, 200, 250mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.

    For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 of WOMAC Global Score: WOMAC is measure with a Likert ordinal scale from 0-4 with lower scores indicating lower levels of symptoms or physical disability

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 week endpoint

  2. Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.

    A Sleep Questionniare addressed the following question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night (hours)?" 12 week endpoint-mean changes from baseline at endpoint for sleep latency. Decrease in time(hours) indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 week endpoint

  3. Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12

    Ordinal measure indicating change from start of treatment (on a scale of 7 = Very much worse to 1 = Very much improved)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 week endpoint

  4. Distribution of Time to Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

    The median time to treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy from baseline to endpoint

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12

    Change from baseline to end point in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Dimension Questionnaire. A higher score indicates an improvement in health in the Health Status Index. The EQ-5D is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 week endpoint

  6. Change From Baseline in Responder Analysis 50% Improvement to Week 12

    Defined by the percentage of subjects achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in the primary endpoint based on the 11-point NRS at week 12. For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

07

Results

Posted Apr 23, 2010

Participant flow

The recruitment period for this out-patient, multicenter study occurred between 07 February 2007 and 15 July 08.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Started344342337
Completed181118203
Not completed163224134
Withdrew: Adverse event6114022
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up503
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject504843
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy15735
Withdrew: Study drug non-compliant674
Withdrew: All other262127
Withdrew: Death010

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.

For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period).
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.
Scores on a scaleTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.-3.0 ± 2.39-2.6 ± 2.38-2.2 ± 2.54
Statistical analysis
  • Tapentadol (CG5503) vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): -0.7 · 95% CI -1.04 to -0.33Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment and pooled analysis center as factors and baseline pain intensity score as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12

Change from baseline to Week 12 of WOMAC Global Score: WOMAC is measure with a Likert ordinal scale from 0-4 with lower scores indicating lower levels of symptoms or physical disability

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12
Scores on a scaleTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12-1.2 ± 0.82-1.1 ± 0.87-0.9 ± 0.84
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.

A Sleep Questionniare addressed the following question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night (hours)?" 12 week endpoint-mean changes from baseline at endpoint for sleep latency. Decrease in time(hours) indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Reported as:
Mean · Hours
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.
HoursTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.0.2 ± 2.80.1 ± 1.810.3 ± 2.72
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12

Ordinal measure indicating change from start of treatment (on a scale of 7 = Very much worse to 1 = Very much improved)

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12
percentage of participantsTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 1251.137.732.4
SecondaryDistribution of Time to Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

The median time to treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy from baseline to endpoint

Time frame:
Baseline to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · median time

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12

Change from baseline to end point in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Dimension Questionnaire. A higher score indicates an improvement in health in the Health Status Index. The EQ-5D is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12
scores on a scaleTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 120.6 ± 0.260.5 ± 0.280.5 ± 0.29
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Responder Analysis 50% Improvement to Week 12

Defined by the percentage of subjects achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in the primary endpoint based on the 11-point NRS at week 12. For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Responder Analysis 50% Improvement to Week 12
Percentage of participantsTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Change From Baseline in Responder Analysis 50% Improvement to Week 1232.017.324.3

Adverse events

Collected over All adverse events were reported from the time a signed and dated informed consent was obtained throughout the follow-up phase of the study. Serious adverse events were collected for 30 days after the last dose of study drug.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tapentadol (CG5503)—4/344 (1.2%)200/344 (58.1%)
Oxycodone—10/342 (2.9%)269/342 (78.7%)
Placebo—6/337 (1.8%)134/337 (39.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent serious events
EventTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
Renal Failure AcuteRenal and urinary disorders0/3442/3420/337
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders0/3441/3421/337
Pyelonephritis AcuteInfections and infestations0/3440/3421/337
Pain in ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/3440/3421/337
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders0/3440/3421/337
Embolic StrokeNervous system disorders0/3440/3421/337
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/3440/3421/337
Angina PectorisCardiac disorders0/3441/3420/337
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders0/3441/3420/337
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/3441/3420/337
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventTapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlacebo
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders65/344126/34222/337
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders74/344125/34223/337
SomnolenceNervous system disorders37/34467/34214/337
DizzinessNervous system disorders61/34465/34216/337
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders18/34461/34211/337
HeadacheNervous system disorders51/34450/34256/337
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders24/34443/3424/337
FatigueGeneral disorders37/34435/34215/337
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7/3445/34222/337
Dry MouthGastrointestinal disorders22/34415/3428/337

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Tapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlaceboTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years249249260758
>=65 years959377265
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Tapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlaceboTotal
Mean58.4 ± 10.0958.2 ± 10.2958.2 ± 9.1558.3 ± 9.85
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tapentadol (CG5503)OxycodonePlaceboTotal
Female216202200618
Male128140137405
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Etropolski M, Kuperwasser B, Flugel M, Haufel T, Lange B, Rauschkolb C, Laschewski F. Safety and tolerability of tapentadol extended release in moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis or low back pain management: pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv Ther. 2014 Jun;31(6):604-20. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0128-6. Epub 2014 Jul 2. PubMed 24985410 ↗
  • Biondi DM, Xiang J, Etropolski M, Moskovitz B. Evaluation of blood pressure and heart rate in patients with hypertension who received tapentadol extended release for chronic pain: a post hoc, pooled data analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Aug;34(8):565-76. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0209-y. PubMed 24916058 ↗
  • Etropolski M, Lange B, Goldberg J, Steup A, Rauschkolb C. A pooled analysis of patient-specific factors and efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol extended release treatment for moderate to severe chronic pain. J Opioid Manag. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):343-56. doi: 10.5055/jom.2013.0177. PubMed 24353047 ↗
  • Merchant S, Provenzano D, Mody S, Ho KF, Etropolski M. Composite measure to assess efficacy/gastrointestinal tolerability of tapentadol ER versus oxycodone CR for chronic pain: pooled analysis of randomized studies. J Opioid Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):51-61. doi: 10.5055/jom.2013.0147. PubMed 23709304 ↗
  • Afilalo M, Morlion B. Efficacy of tapentadol ER for managing moderate to severe chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2013 Jan;16(1):27-40. PubMed 23340531 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2007, a primary completion of Jul 2008 and a completion of Dec 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2010, 1 year 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2007
First posted
Jan 15, 2007
Start
Jan 2007
Primary completionActual
Jul 2008
CompletionActual
Dec 2008
Results first posted
Apr 23, 2010
Last update
Apr 18, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00421928
Collaborators
Grünenthal GmbH
First posted
Jan 15, 2007
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Jul 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Results posted
Apr 23, 2010
Last update
Apr 18, 2012

Study contacts

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
study director · Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tapentadol

Start the discussion