CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00395200MSCIMSUpdated Oct 25, 2011

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Multiple Sclerosis (MSCIMS)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of MSC Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by University of Cambridge. Completed at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-10-25.

Sponsored by University of Cambridge · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypothesis: Intravenous administration of bone marrow-derived autologous adult human mesenchymal stem cells is a safe novel therapeutic approach for patients with multiple sclerosis.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Multiple Sclerosis (MSCIMS) is a phase I/IIA trial designed to establish the safety of intravenous administration of bone marrow-derived autologous adult human mesenchymal stem cells to patients with multiple sclerosis.

Read the detailed description

Disease under investigation: Multiple Sclerosis

Phase: I/IIA

Number of patients: 10

Design: 18 month cross over, single treatment at 6 months

Intervention: Administration of bone marrow-derived autologous mesenchymal stem cells

Route of administration: Intravenous

Dose: Up to 2,000,000 Mesenchymal Stem Cells per kilogram

Source of patients: Referrals accepted from Neurologists in East Anglia and North London, UK

Referral Criteria: (all 3 required)

  1. Clinically definite multiple sclerosis
  2. Expanded Kurtzke Disability Status Score 2.0 - 6.5 (inclusive)
  3. Evidence of optic nerve damage by

    • history of optic neuritis, or
    • relative afferent pupillary defect, or
    • optic atrophy on fundoscopy, or
    • abnormal visual evoked potential from either or both eyes suggestive of demyelination

Primary Objective: Establish the safety of intravenously administered bone marrow-derived autologous mesenchymal stem cells at a dose of up to 2,000,000 cells/kg over 12 months by monitoring adverse reactions.

Secondary Objectives: Explore the efficacy of intravenously administered bone marrow-derived autologous mesenchymal stem cells at a dose of up to 2,000,000 cells/kg over 12 months on visual function by clinical, neurophysiological, and imaging assessments.

Outcome Measures:

  1. Primary

    • Adverse events
  2. Secondary

    • Visual function (acuity and colour)
    • Visual evoked potential latency
    • Optic nerve Magnetisation Transfer Ratio
    • Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (by optical coherence tomography)
    • Brain lesion Magnetisation Transfer Ratio
    • MRI brain T1 hypointensity load
    • T cell response suppression
  3. Tertiary

    • Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Score
    • Expanded Kurtzke Disability Status Score
02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Safety
  • Therapeutics
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
  • Optic Neuritis
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cambridge is the lead sponsor of 112 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically definite multiple sclerosis
  • Expanded Kurtzke Disability Status Score 2.0 - 6.5 (inclusive)
  • Evidence of optic nerve damage by:
  • history of optic neuritis, or
  • relative afferent pupillary defect, or
  • optic atrophy on fundoscopy, or
  • abnormal visual evoked potential from either or both eyes suggestive of demyelination
  • Prolonged visual evoked potential P100 latency with preserved waveform
  • T2 lesion on MRI optic nerve
  • Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness on optical coherence tomography > 40 microns

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Age > 65 years
  • Patient lacks capacity to give informed consent
  • Presence of a severe bleeding disorder
  • Planning a pregnancy during the trial period
  • Current MS disease modifying therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MSC Treatment

    Procedure: MSC Treatment

Interventions

  • ProcedureMSC Treatment

    Intravenous administration of up to 2x10\^6 autologous MSCs per kg

    Also known as: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Multipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Time frame: 0,1,2,3,4,12 and 52 weeks post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual function (acuity and colour)

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

  2. Visual evoked potential latency

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

  3. Optic nerve Magnetisation Transfer Ratio

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

  4. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (by optical coherence tomography)

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

  5. Brain lesion Magnetisation Transfer Ratio

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

  6. MRI brain T1 hypointensity load

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

  7. Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Score

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

  8. Expanded Kurtzke Disability Status Score

    Time frame: 12 and 52 weeks post treatment

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Cambridge Dept of Clinical Neurosciences
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 0PY, United Kingdom
  • University College London Institute of Neurology
    London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Connick P, Kolappan M, Patani R, Scott MA, Crawley C, He XL, Richardson K, Barber K, Webber DJ, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Tozer DJ, Samson RS, Thomas DL, Du MQ, Luan SL, Michell AW, Altmann DR, Thompson AJ, Miller DH, Compston A, Chandran S. The mesenchymal stem cells in multiple sclerosis (MSCIMS) trial protocol and baseline cohort characteristics: an open-label pre-test: post-test study with blinded outcome assessments. Trials. 2011 Mar 2;12:62. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-62. PubMed 21366911 ↗
  • Connick P, Kolappan M, Crawley C, Webber DJ, Patani R, Michell AW, Du MQ, Luan SL, Altmann DR, Thompson AJ, Compston A, Scott MA, Miller DH, Chandran S. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Feb;11(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70305-2. Epub 2012 Jan 10. PubMed 22236384 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00395200
Lead sponsor
University of Cambridge
Collaborators
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Research Council
Responsible party
Peter Connick (Research Associate, University of Cambridge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2006
Start date
Jul 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Last update
Oct 25, 2011

Study contacts

Siddharthan Chandran, MBChB, PhD
principal investigator · University of Cambridge

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion