CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00157820DATASUpdated Jul 2, 2025Results posted

DATAS: The Dual Chamber & Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse Events Study

An interventional study of Single Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and Dual Chamber implantable cardioverter defibrilator in Ventricular Tachycardia, Ventricular Fibrillation and Defibrillators, Implantable, sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-02.

Sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
354
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Dual Chamber \& Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse Events Study (DATAS) was designed to analyze the ability of dual chamber ICDs, to reduce clinically significant adverse events as compared to single chamber ICD in a non selected population with conventional indication of ICD implantation.

Read the detailed description

Single chamber (SC) implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have several limitations that might be relevant during follow up, like atrial pacing requirements, inadequate therapies, sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias and difficulties to achieve an accurate diagnosis of the arrhythmia. Dual chamber (DC) ICDs offer an attractive rationale solution, although controversy remains if the costs and complexity of the implants offer a real clinical advantage.

The DATAS is a, prospective, multicentre, randomized, open labelled study, with three arms (two of them cross-over and the third parallels the other two)

The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether use of Dual Chamber ICD (DDED-DDDR NASPE/BPEG Defibrillator/Pacemaker Codes) results in a significant decrease in the number of primary end points.

The primary end point is a composite comprising four so-denominated "Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAE)":

  1. all-cause mortality
  2. invasive intervention, hospitalization (>24 h) or prolongation of hospitalization due to cardiovascular cause
  3. inappropriate shocks (two or more episodes with inappropriate shocks)
  4. sustained symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmias that (a) require urgent termination or (b) last more than 48 h leading to therapeutic intervention.

Secondary objectives are:

  1. Number of each of the components of the CSAE.
  2. Arrhythmia related: atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT), frequency and burden, ventricular tachyarrhythmia frequency and burden number of appropriate shocks, number of inappropriate shocks, need for reprogramming, need for medication/Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for arrhythmia control, pacemaker syndrome and development of dual chamber pacing indication.
  3. Cardiovascular related: New York Health Association (NYHA) functional class, exercise capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), reduction of medication (diuretics.).
  4. Quality of life: evaluated by the SF-36, Minnesota living test, with heart failure and Symptom Checklist instruments.
02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • Ventricular Fibrillation
  • Defibrillators, Implantable

Keywords

  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
  • Clinical Trial
03

In context

Tachycardia, Ventricular

431 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular; 119 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 354 is above the median of 64 across 260 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular.

Browse Tachycardia, Ventricular studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure is the lead sponsor of 239 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meet the Class I implantation criteria for single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator according to the guidelines (ACC/AHA).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent atrial fibrillation
  • Patients without structural heart disease
  • Patient meets implantation criteria for dual-chamber pacing (symptomatic sinus node disease, all 2nd Atrio-Ventricular (AV) block [except asymptomatic Mobitz I] and all 3rd degree AV block ).
  • Patient with previous system implanted (ICD or pacemaker).
  • Patients with biventricular stimulation or re-synchronization.
  • Patient has a mechanical right heart valve.
  • Patient has medical conditions that would preclude the testing required by the protocol, or limit study participation.
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to cooperate or give written informed consent, or the patient is a minor and legal guardians refuse to give informed consent.
  • Patient is or will be inaccessible for follow-up at the study center.
  • Patients who are enrolled or planning to enroll in other clinical trials during the clinical study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
354 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    SC true

    Single chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator programmed as a Single Chamber.

    Device: Single Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

  • Experimental
    SC sim

    Dual chamber ICD initially programmed as single chamber (SC simulated) ICD (''SC sim arm'')

    Device: Dual Chamber implantable cardioverter defibrilator

  • Experimental
    DC true

    Dual chamber ICD initially programmed as a DDED (''DC true arm'').

    Device: Dual Chamber implantable cardioverter defibrilator

Interventions

  • DeviceSingle Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

    Single chamber ICD implantation: Medtronic GEM, Medtronic Marquis family of SC ICD

    Also known as: Medtronic GEM, Medtronic Marquis family of SC ICD

  • DeviceDual Chamber implantable cardioverter defibrilator

    Dual chamber ICD implantation: Jewel AF \& GemIII AT as DC ICDs (DC true and SC sim arms)

    Also known as: Medtronic Jewel AF, Medtronic GemIII AT, DC ICD

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CSAE-score Rate(Clinical Significant Adverse Events Score Rate)

    Main outcome was defined as the CSAE-score during follow-up: CSAE-score rate. We assigned death as the worst outcome during the entire study; and premature cross-over as the main failure of the assigned therapy. So each CSAE was assigned 1 point but (a) death was assigned a score equal to the max number of CSAE in any individual patient in the entire study +1, and (b) premature authorized crossover was given a score equal to the max number of CSAE in any individual patient in that period. Thus, main outcome was defined as the CSAE-score over length of follow-up resulting in a CSAE-score rate.

    Time frame: 17 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Each of the Components of the CSAE

    The primary endpoint is a composite of 5 pre-determine Clinical Significant Adverse Events (CSAE): (1) all-cause mortality, (2) invasive intervention due to Cardiovascular cause, (3) hospitalization (\>24h) or prolongation of hospitalization due to CV, (4) inappropriate shocks: two or more episodes with inappropriate shocks, (5) sustained symptomatic ATs that (a) require urgent termination or (b) lasted more than 48 h leading to therapeutic intervention. Number of each of the components of CSAE, counts the number of events for each pre-determined level.

    Time frame: 17 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 21, 2012
Limitations and caveats
The follow-up might have been too short to reveal differences in heart failure-related hospitalizations and related mortality. Premature crossovers are a limitation of RCT. However, our scoring system severely penalized this cross-overs.

Participant flow

Patients were eligible if they met a standard Class I indication for a Single Chamber-Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) according to the 1998 ACC/AHA guidelines. Every patient eligible for ICD was screened at each study centre. Follow-up started immediately after randomization.

Randomized
Participant flow — Randomized
MilestoneSC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC Sim
Started118116120
Completed111111112
Not completed758
Withdrew: Physician decision423
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject123
Withdrew: Protocol violation212
1st 8 Month
Participant flow — 1st 8 Month
MilestoneSC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC Sim
Started111111112
Completed10399106
Not completed8126
Withdrew: Death783
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up121
Withdrew: Premature cross-over022
1 Month Wash Out Period
Participant flow — 1 Month Wash Out Period
MilestoneSC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC Sim
Started103101108
Completed103101108
Not completed000
2nd 8 Months
Participant flow — 2nd 8 Months
MilestoneSC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC Sim
Started103101108
Completed988894
Not completed51314
Withdrew: Death313
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up152
Withdrew: Premature cross-over179

Outcome measures

PrimaryCSAE-score Rate(Clinical Significant Adverse Events Score Rate)

Main outcome was defined as the CSAE-score during follow-up: CSAE-score rate. We assigned death as the worst outcome during the entire study; and premature cross-over as the main failure of the assigned therapy. So each CSAE was assigned 1 point but (a) death was assigned a score equal to the max number of CSAE in any individual patient in the entire study +1, and (b) premature authorized crossover was given a score equal to the max number of CSAE in any individual patient in that period. Thus, main outcome was defined as the CSAE-score over length of follow-up resulting in a CSAE-score rate.

Time frame:
17 months
Reported as:
Number · score/month
CSAE-score Rate(Clinical Significant Adverse Events Score Rate)
score/monthSC TrueSC SimulatedDC True
CSAE-score Rate(Clinical Significant Adverse Events Score Rate)0.1120.1280.075
Statistical analysis
  • SC True vs DC True · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0028 · Odds ratio (or): 0.31 · 95% CI 0.14 to 0.67An additional primary analysis was pre-planned: the odds ratio of CSAE-score between DC and SC obtained from SAS GENMOD procedure with the length of follow-up as an 'offset'.
SecondaryNumber of Each of the Components of the CSAE

The primary endpoint is a composite of 5 pre-determine Clinical Significant Adverse Events (CSAE): (1) all-cause mortality, (2) invasive intervention due to Cardiovascular cause, (3) hospitalization (\>24h) or prolongation of hospitalization due to CV, (4) inappropriate shocks: two or more episodes with inappropriate shocks, (5) sustained symptomatic ATs that (a) require urgent termination or (b) lasted more than 48 h leading to therapeutic intervention. Number of each of the components of CSAE, counts the number of events for each pre-determined level.

Time frame:
17 months
Reported as:
Number · events
Number of Each of the Components of the CSAE
eventsSC TrueSC SimulatedDC True
Death10114
Invasive intervention CV111210
Hospitalizations (>24h) or prolongued CV425147
Inappropiate shocks (>2 episodes)1373
Long Duration AT631

Adverse events

Collected over Duration of the enrollment+follow up. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SC True—50/111 (45%)13/111 (11.7%)
SC Simulated—49/223 (22%)8/223 (3.6%)
DC True—44/223 (19.7%)3/223 (1.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSC TrueSC SimulatedDC True
Hospitalization or prolongued hospitalizationsCardiac disorders33/11132/22336/223
Invasive interventionsCardiac disorders11/11112/2239/223
DeathGeneral disorders10/11111/2234/223
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSC TrueSC SimulatedDC True
Innapropiate shocksCardiac disorders10/1117/2232/223
Sustain Symptomatic ATCardiac disorders5/1114/2231/223

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)SC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC SimTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years636153177
>=65 years485059157
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC SimTotal
Mean63 ± 1062 ± 1166 ± 964 ± 10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC SimTotal
Female11212052
Male1009092282
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)SC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC SimTotal
Spain434444131
Germany29293189
Italy21211961
Israel98926
United Kingdom66618
Portugal3339
LVEF
LVEF(percentage)SC TrueSC Simulated Then DC TrueDC True Then SC SimTotal
Mean35 ± 1339 ± 1434 ± 1236 ± 13
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Quesada A, Almendral J, Arribas F, Ricci R, Wolpert C, Adragao P, Cobo E, Navarro X; DATAS Investigators. The DATAS rationale and design: a controlled, randomized trial to assess the clinical benefit of dual chamber (DDED) defibrillator. Europace. 2004 Mar;6(2):142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2003.11.011. PubMed 15018874 ↗
  • Almendral J, Arribas F, Wolpert C, Ricci R, Adragao P, Cobo E, Navarro X, Quesada A; DATAS Steering Committee; DATAS Writing Committee; DATAS Investigators. Dual-chamber defibrillators reduce clinically significant adverse events compared with single-chamber devices: results from the DATAS (Dual chamber and Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse events Study) trial. Europace. 2008 May;10(5):528-35. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun072. Epub 2008 Apr 7. PubMed 18390985 ↗
  • Ricci RP, Quesada A, Almendral J, Arribas F, Wolpert C, Adragao P, Zoni-Berisso M, Navarro X, DeSanto T, Grammatico A, Santini M; DATAS study Investigators. Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators reduce clinical adverse events related to atrial fibrillation when compared with single-chamber defibrillators: a subanalysis of the DATAS trial. Europace. 2009 May;11(5):587-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup072. PubMed 19401341 ↗
  • Hadid C, Almendral J, Ortiz M, Schwab JO, Janko S, Mischke K, Arribas F, Wolpert C, Ricci R, Adragao P, Cobo E, Navarro X, Quesada A. Incidence, determinants, and prognostic implications of true pleomorphism of ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defribillators: a substudy of the DATAS Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;4(1):33-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.957068. Epub 2010 Nov 13. PubMed 21076160 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00157820
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 12, 2005
Start date
Nov 2000
Primary completion
May 2005
Completion
Oct 2005
Results posted
Aug 21, 2012
Last update
Jul 2, 2025

Study contacts

Aurelio Quesada, MD
principal investigator · Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain
Jesus Almendral, MD
principal investigator · Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
Fernando Arribas, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Massimo Santini, MD
principal investigator · San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
Christian Wolpert, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
Pedro Adragao, MD
principal investigator · Santa Cruz Hospital, Carnaxide, Portugal

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion