ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00149669Updated Sep 14, 2017Results posted

Employment-based Reinforcement of Naltrexone Ingestion and Abstinence

An interventional study of employment-based reinforcement in Cocaine-Related Disorders, Heroin Dependence and Opioid-Related Disorders, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-14.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
67
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized study is planned over 5 years to evaluate the effectiveness of the Therapeutic Workplace in promoting naltrexone ingestion and abstinence in unemployed opiate-dependent injection drug users. Participants will be offered an opioid detoxification and naltrexone induction. Participants who complete the naltrexone induction will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will be invited to work in the Therapeutic Workplace and prescribed naltrexone for 26 weeks. The groups will differ in the contingencies imposed to work and earn salary. Work Plus Naltrexone Contingency participants will be required to ingest naltrexone to work, and will receive a brief pay decrease for missing a dose. Work Plus Naltrexone Prescription participants will be prescribed naltrexone, but will not be required to ingest it to work. This study will provide a rigorous evaluation of a novel employment-based intervention, the Therapeutic Workplace, to promote naltrexone ingestion and drug abstinence in a population of injection drug users who are at considerable risk of spreading or contracting HIV infection. Hypotheses being tested in this study are: Naltrexone ingestion will be maintained in the group exposed to the employment-based naltrexone treatment significantly more than the group exposed to usual-care treatment package. Opiate abstinence will be maintained in the group exposed to the employment-based naltrexone treatment significantly more than the group exposed to usual-care treatment package.

Read the detailed description

General Therapeutic Workplace Procedures The study was conducted in a model therapeutic workplace in which employment-based reinforcement contingencies are arranged to promote therapeutic behavior change. All participants were invited to attend the workplace for four hours every weekday to work on training programs that were almost fully automated. Participants earned vouchers that were exchangeable for goods and services in the community. Earnings were based on attendance in the workplace and performance in the training programs. Overall, voucher earnings were arranged such that participants could earn a base pay of $8.00/hour for the hours worked in the workplace plus approximately $2.00/hour for their performance on the training programs, for a total potential wage of $10/hour. Detailed descriptions of the therapeutic workplace, the web-based training programs, the staffing requirements, and the cost of the intervention can be found elsewhere. Participants in the Prescription group were eligible to work and earn vouchers independent of naltrexone consumption and/or drug use, however Contingency participants were only permitted to work when naltrexone consumption was objectively confirmed.

Assessment Procedures Assessments were conducted at study intake and every 30 days throughout the study. Primary assessment measures included the Addiction Severity Index-Lite to evaluate changes in medical, employment, alcohol, drug, social, legal and psychological functioning; the opiate, cocaine, alcohol and nicotine sections of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview to evaluate psychiatric disorders; the Risk Assessment of Behavior to evaluate HIV-risk behaviors; and the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Symptom Checklist-90 to evaluate psychosocial functioning. Additional measures were collected.

Naltrexone is contraindicated for patients with hepatic damage or reductions in liver functioning, and is rated in the FDA pregnancy category C. Therefore, blood samples were taken at intake, and months 1, 2, 3, and 5 for liver function (aminotransferase) levels, and pregnancy tests were conducted monthly. Naltrexone was discontinued permanently for one Contingency and one Prescription participant, and temporarily for one Contingency and one Prescription participant due to abnormal aminotransferase levels. Naltrexone was discontinued for one Contingency participant due to pregnancy.

Urine samples were collected under same-sex staff observation upon arrival to the workplace every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and at each 30-day assessment. Urine samples were analyzed immediately onsite for evidence of opiates (morphine, >300ng/ml), and cocaine (benzoylecgonine, >300ng/ml) using an Abbott AxSYM® fluorescent polarization immunoassay system. Samples collected at 30-day assessments were also analyzed for evidence of buprenorphine, methadone, amphetamine, benzodiazepines, and naltrexone. Urine samples were analyzed for naltrexone using an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure; values \<5ng/ml were considered negative for naltrexone (Friends Laboratory, MD). Participants were informed of their urinalysis results but there were no consequences for positive test results.

Participants were instructed to notify study staff of any adverse events they experienced as soon as possible after the occurrence of the event. Any staff member who was notified by a participant of a potential adverse event filed a formal report into an automated system, which immediately distributed the reports to study investigators and key staff. Ongoing or unresolved adverse events were also included in a weekly adverse event report that was distributed to study investigators and key staff. At all 30-day assessments study staff assessed new adverse events and attempted to resolve any ongoing or unresolved adverse events. Participants were referred to medical staff to receive treatments and concomitant medications as needed, and reports were filed with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and funding agency in accordance with the relevant institutional requirements and guidelines.

Oral Naltrexone Treatment Participants were required to complete opiate detoxification before being invited to attend the therapeutic workplace for induction onto oral naltrexone (Depade®; Mallinckrodt Inc.). All opiate detoxification and naltrexone inductions were overseen by a physician and were guided solely by clinical considerations. All participants were notified of the potential for heightened risk of overdose in relation to naltrexone treatment and after extended periods of opiate abstinence. These notifications were issued by study staff during the study consent process, and at monthly assessments, and were issued by medical staff prior to initiating naltrexone treatment, and whenever a blood draw was conducted. Overdose risk reminders were read aloud and signed by the study participants. Finally, monthly lunch-time overdose prevention seminars were provided and free pizza was provided to encourage seminar attendance.

During the 4-week induction period, participants were required to ingest scheduled doses of oral naltrexone to gain access to the therapeutic workplace. Induction onto oral naltrexone was determined by clinical judgment; participants were generally inducted using a 3-day dose run-up schedule (e.g., 12.5 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg) in order to reach the full maintenance dose of 100 mg (Monday and Wednesday) and 150 mg (Friday) for the four-week period. Only participants who completed the induction period were considered eligible for randomization; these participants were invited to attend the therapeutic workplace for 26 weeks, and were offered oral naltrexone at no cost for the duration of the study. Participants were also offered access to outpatient drug abuse counseling that was provided independent of the workplace throughout their participation in the study.

Randomization Prior to group assignment, participants were stratified to an experimental group in a 1:1 ratio according to whether they attended the workplace on >85% of days during the 4-week induction period, provided >1 opiate positive urine sample during the final 2 weeks of the induction period, and provided >75% cocaine-positive urine samples during the 4-week induction period. Eligible participants were assigned to one of two experimental groups (i.e., Prescription or Contingency) using an urn randomization method that ensured all levels of each stratification variable were evenly distributed across the groups. This research design originally proposed three experimental groups; therefore, four participants were randomized into a third experimental group that required participants to ingest naltrexone under staff observation and provide an opiate and cocaine-negative urine sample to maintain maximum pay in the workplace. Due to logistical difficulties encountered early in the study, it became clear that it would not be possible to randomize a sample size large enough to support a 3-group comparison within the planned study duration. A second power analysis was completed to determine the appropriate sample size for a 2-group comparison (described below) and the third experimental group was eliminated. Data from participants randomized into the third group have not been included in these analyses.

Experimental Groups All participants were invited to attend the therapeutic workplace for 26 weeks. Prescription group participants were provided a take-home supply of oral naltrexone every 30 days and were allowed to access the workplace independent of naltrexone ingestion. Contingency participants were required to ingest oral naltrexone under staff observation every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday to gain access to the workplace. Contingency participants who missed a naltrexone dose were not permitted to access the workplace until they were able to resume naltrexone. Additionally, missing a scheduled dose resulted in a base pay reset from $8 per hour to $1 per hour. After a reset a participant's base pay increased by $1 per hour to a maximum of $8 per hour for every day that a participant attended the workplace for at least 5 minutes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cocaine-Related Disorders
  • Heroin Dependence
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Keywords

  • Behavior Therapy
  • Cocaine
  • Cocaine (IV)
  • Cocaine Abuse
  • Cocaine Dependence
  • Contingency management
  • HIV risk behaviors
  • Heroin
  • Naltrexone
  • Opioid Dependence
  • sexual risk behaviors
03

In context

Cocaine-Related Disorders

416 studies on the registry are indexed under Cocaine-Related Disorders; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 67 is above the median of 60 across 313 interventional studies indexed under Cocaine-Related Disorders.

Browse Cocaine-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Volunteers were eligible to participate if they

  • were between the ages of 18 and 65 years,
  • were unemployed (i.e., reporting no work in the past 30 days and earning $200 in taxable income per month),
  • self-reported injection drug use and had visible track marks (assessed via visual inspection),
  • provided a urine sample that tested positive for both opiates and cocaine upon entry into detoxification,
  • met criteria for opiate dependence,
  • were medically approved to be maintained on naltrexone by the study physician,
  • and lived within reasonable commuting distance to the research unit (i.e., in Baltimore City and the immediate surrounding area).

Volunteers were excluded if they

  • had active hallucinations, delusions, or a thought disorder;
  • were judged to be of imminent threat to harm self or others;
  • were currently incarcerated, in a halfway house, or under constant monitoring;
  • were pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • had serum aminotransferase levels over 3 times normal;
  • required opiates for other medical problems (and thus could not be maintained on naltrexone, which would block the effects on any opiate);
  • reported an interest in methadone treatment;
  • had active tuberculosis;
  • or had physical limitations that would prevent typing
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Work Plus Naltrexone Prescription

    Participants were prescribed naltrexone, but were not be required to ingest it to work. Participants could work and earn money, independent of whether or not they continued to take naltrexone.

  • Experimental
    Work Plus Naltrexone Contingency

    Participants were required to ingest naltrexone to work, and received a brief pay decrease for missing a dose (employment-based reinforcement of naltrexone ingestion).

    Behavioral: employment-based reinforcement

Interventions

  • Behavioralemployment-based reinforcement

    Work Plus Naltrexone Contingency participants were required to ingest naltrexone to work, and received a brief pay decrease for missing a dose.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Urine Samples Positive for Naltrexone

    The number of urine samples positive for naltrexone divided by the total number of urine samples times 100.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Cocaine

    the number of urine samples that were negative for cocaine divided by the total number of urine samples) x 100

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opiates

    The number of urine samples negative for opiates divided by the total number of urine samples times 100.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. HIV Risk Behaviors

    Behaviors that place participants at risk for acquiring or transmitting HIV

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Cost Benefit Analysis

    The costs and economic benefits of the intervention

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Percentage of Urine/Breath Samples Negative for Other Drugs of Abuse

    The percentage of urine and breath samples that are negative for other drugs of abuse

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Cocaine Positive Urine Samples

    The number of urine samples that were positive for cocaine

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 16, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWork Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone Contingency
Started3235
Completed2930
Not completed35

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Urine Samples Positive for Naltrexone

The number of urine samples positive for naltrexone divided by the total number of urine samples times 100.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Urine Samples
Percentage of Urine Samples Positive for Naltrexone
Percentage of Urine SamplesWork Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone Contingency
Percentage of Urine Samples Positive for Naltrexone21 (0 to 100)72 (0 to 100)
Statistical analysis
  • Work Plus Naltrexone Prescription vs Work Plus Naltrexone Contingency · General Estimating Equation (GEE) · p = <0.01 · Odds ratio (or): 8.67 · 95% CI 4.24 to 17.73
SecondaryPercentage of Urine Samples Negative for Cocaine

the number of urine samples that were negative for cocaine divided by the total number of urine samples) x 100

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Urine Samples
Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Cocaine
Percentage of Urine SamplesWork Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone Contingency
Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Cocaine53 (0 to 100)56 (0 to 100)
Statistical analysis
  • Work Plus Naltrexone Prescription vs Work Plus Naltrexone Contingency · General Estimating Equation (GEE) · p = 0.82 · Odds ratio (or): 0.91 · 95% CI .43 to 1.95
SecondaryPercentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opiates

The number of urine samples negative for opiates divided by the total number of urine samples times 100.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Urine Samples
Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opiates
Percentage of Urine SamplesWork Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone Contingency
Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opiates60 (0 to 100)71 (0 to 100)
Statistical analysis
  • Work Plus Naltrexone Prescription vs Work Plus Naltrexone Contingency · General Estimating Equation (GEE) · p = =0.19 · Odds ratio (or): 0.61 · 95% CI 0.29 to 1.26
Other pre-specifiedHIV Risk Behaviors

Behaviors that place participants at risk for acquiring or transmitting HIV

Time frame:
6 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedCost Benefit Analysis

The costs and economic benefits of the intervention

Time frame:
6 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Urine/Breath Samples Negative for Other Drugs of Abuse

The percentage of urine and breath samples that are negative for other drugs of abuse

Time frame:
6 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedCocaine Positive Urine Samples

The number of urine samples that were positive for cocaine

Time frame:
6 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Work Plus Naltrexone Prescription—0/32 (0%)4/32 (12.5%)
Work Plus Naltrexone Contingency—1/35 (2.9%)7/35 (20%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventWork Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone Contingency
death by narcotic intoxicationGeneral disorders0/321/35
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventWork Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone Contingency
Ejaculation difficultyReproductive system and breast disorders1/322/35
General medical treatment,General disorders1/320/35
Inpatient heroin detoxificationGeneral disorders1/320/35
Jitters or shakesGeneral disorders1/320/35
Abnormal Liver Function TestHepatobiliary disorders0/321/35
Abdominal crampsGastrointestinal disorders0/321/35
Vomiting, diarrhea, chillsGastrointestinal disorders0/321/35
E.R. for nauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/321/35
Rapid heart rateCardiac disorders0/321/35
E.R. for adnominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/321/35

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Work Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone ContingencyTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years323567
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Work Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone ContingencyTotal
Mean47 ± 743 ± 945 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Work Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone ContingencyTotal
Female101626
Male221941
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Work Plus Naltrexone PrescriptionWork Plus Naltrexone ContingencyTotal
United States323567
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Center for Learning and Health
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dunn KE, Defulio A, Everly JJ, Donlin WD, Aklin WM, Nuzzo PA, Leoutsakos JM, Umbricht A, Fingerhood M, Bigelow GE, Silverman K. Employment-based reinforcement of adherence to oral naltrexone treatment in unemployed injection drug users. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Feb;21(1):74-83. doi: 10.1037/a0030743. Epub 2012 Dec 3. PubMed 23205722 ↗
  • Dunn K, DeFulio A, Everly JJ, Donlin WD, Aklin WM, Nuzzo PA, Leoutsakos JM, Umbricht A, Fingerhood M, Bigelow GE, Silverman K. Employment-based reinforcement of adherence to oral naltrexone in unemployed injection drug users: 12-month outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;29(2):270-6. doi: 10.1037/adb0000010. Epub 2014 Aug 18. PubMed 25134047 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00149669
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2005
Start date
Dec 2005
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Results posted
Aug 16, 2017
Last update
Sep 14, 2017

Study contacts

Kenneth Silverman, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion