CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00141440Updated Dec 30, 2009

The Effect of Cycling Off Criteria During Pressure Support Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients

An interventional study of mechanical ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by Policlinico Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-12-30.

Sponsored by Policlinico Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators' aim is to study the effect of cycling off criteria during pressure support ventilation in COPD patients at two levels of PEEP and PSV.

Read the detailed description

In this study two levels of cycling off criteria at two levels of PEEP and PSV were tested in term of gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, work of breathing and patient comfort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

  • gas exchange
  • pressure support ventilation
  • respiratory mechanics
  • COPD patients
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Policlinico Hospital is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Stable COPD patients during invasive mechanical ventilation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability,
  • Paralysis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    COPD patients

    Procedure: mechanical ventilation

Interventions

  • Proceduremechanical ventilation

    evaluated the effect of two different cycling off criteria on breathing pattern, respiratory effort, and gas exchange in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Respiratory mechanics, gas exchange

    Time frame: 2 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comfort of breathing

    Time frame: 2 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ospedale Sacco
    Milano, 20100, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chiumello D, Polli F, Tallarini F, Chierichetti M, Motta G, Azzari S, Colombo R, Rech R, Pelosi P, Raimondi F, Gattinoni L. Effect of different cycling-off criteria and positive end-expiratory pressure during pressure support ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2547-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000287594.80110.34. PubMed 17893630 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 30, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00141440
Lead sponsor
Policlinico Hospital
First posted
Sep 1, 2005
Start date
Jul 2005
Primary completion
Mar 2007
Completion
Mar 2007
Last update
Dec 30, 2009

Study contacts

davide chiumello, md
principal investigator · Policlinico Hospital
Davide Chiumello, MD
study chair · Policlinico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion