ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06848010TRAC-PRESUpdated Jan 28, 2026

TRacheal Cuff PRessure Evaluation Study

An interventional study of Automated endotracheal cuff controller in Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated and Mechanical Ventilation, sponsored by Policlinico Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by Policlinico Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Randomized clinical trial in mechanically ventilate critically ill patients. The study will evaluated the efficacy of a continous endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure controller (TRACH FLUSH group) compared to manual monitoring and inflation (STANDARD group).

Patients intubated, from at least 24 hours and with a predicted duration of invasive mechanical ventilation longer than 72 hours, will be randomized to the use of TRACH FLUSH versus nurse operated analogic cuff pressure controller q8.

Hypotesis of the study is the superiority of the continuous cuff pressure controller in maintaining cuff pressure within the target value, thus decreasing the incidence of microaspiration events.

Aim of the study are 1) to compare the incidence of cuff pressure value detection outside the target range between the TRACH FLUSH and the STANDARD group, and 2) to compare the incidence of sputum samples positive for (amylase and/or pepsin), a surrogate for tracheal micro-aspiration event.

Read the detailed description

Endotracheal intubation is an effective method of providing rapid and safe airway patency and respiratory support in the intensive care unit (ICU). Endotracheal intubation effectively isolates the trachea by inflating the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff just below the vocal cords: this ensures airway patency and positive pressure ventilation. The pressure of the endotracheal tube cuff (Pcuff) should be between 20-30 cmH2O to ensure airway isolation. The literature reports that overinflation of the endotracheal cuff (>30 cmH2O) causes hoarseness, sore throat, inadequate swallowing of secretions, tracheal stenosis, tracheal wall damage, and ischemia due to decreased mucosal capillary blood flow: these changes can occur even if a high Pcuff is maintained for a short period of time. In contrast, inadequate inflation (less than 20 cmH2O) results in ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to ineffective ventilation and microaspiration of gastric and/or oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs. Risk factors for microaspiration include patient-related factors, factors related to endotracheal tube type, performance of invasive procedures such as enteral nutrition through a nasogastric or orogastric tube, and mechanical ventilation. Patient-related factors include supine position, sedation, coma, tracheal diameter, and viscosity of secretions, while among those related to tube type we find impossible vocal cord closure, longitudinal folds of low-pressure and high-volume polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tracheal tubes. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) states that in order to achieve adequate pressure and prevent mucosal damage, the amount of pressure and volume of air needed, the size, shape of the tube, mode of mechanical ventilation, and the patient's blood pressure must be taken into account.

The methods found in ICUs to control Pcuff and keep it within safe ranges are about a dozen and range from manual external palpation of the inflation balloon, to assessment of inspiratory/expiratory volume loss to continuous monitoring with appropriate instrumentation.

Despite the known Pcuff-related complications of ETT, there is a paucity of national or international guidelines on the optimal pressure value, frequency of pressure measurement, and measurement methods: however, some studies performed show that the use of an automated device that continuously monitors Pcuff significantly decreases gastric microaspirations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
  • Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

  • pressure cuff control
  • mechanical ventilation
03

In context

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is below the median of 115 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.

Browse Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated studies →

Lead sponsor

Policlinico Hospital is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Required invasive mechanical ventilation expected to last for more than 24h
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intubated from more than 6 hours at the time of screening
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous surgery involving the airways
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Automated endotracheal cuff controller

    The endotracheal tube cuff pressure will be continuously controlled by the Trachflush system, at pre-specifed pressure level of 25 cmH20.

    Device: Automated endotracheal cuff controller

  • No intervention
    Control group (analogic manometer)

    The endotracheal cuff will be inflated at 25 cmH20 manually by an analogic manometer. Every 8 hours analogic manometry will be performed to assess cuff pressure.

Interventions

  • DeviceAutomated endotracheal cuff controller

    The automated endotracheal tube cuff pressure controller will continously assess and maintain the endotracheal tube cuff pressure at pre-specifed pressure level of 25 cmH20.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cuff Pressure

    Incidence of measurements with a endotracheal cuff pressure outside the prespecified target value: 25 cmH2O

    Time frame: From enrollment to either the 5th day of invasive mechanical ventilation, or discontinuation of invasive mechanical ventilation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Microaspiration

    Incidence of detection of detectable levels of Pepsin A and Amylase in the tracheal secretions samples. Daily sampling of tracheal secretions will be performed at 8:00AM.

    Time frame: From enrollment to either the 5th day of invasive mechanical ventilation, or discontinuation of invasive mechanical ventilation

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumar CM, Seet E, Van Zundert TCRV. Measuring endotracheal tube intracuff pressure: no room for complacency. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Feb;35(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00501-2. Epub 2020 Mar 20. PubMed 32198671 ↗
  • Hamilton VA, Grap MJ. The role of the endotracheal tube cuff in microaspiration. Heart Lung. 2012 Mar-Apr;41(2):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Dec 30. PubMed 22209048 ↗
  • Blot SI, Poelaert J, Kollef M. How to avoid microaspiration? A key element for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated ICU patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 28;14:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-119. PubMed 25430629 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data regarding characteristics of patients enrolled, treatment performed and outcome will be available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: After the completion of patients enrollement and once study data have been verified by investigators. Data will be available for undefinite time.

Access criteria: Researchers interested in the topic, previous authorization of the principal investigator

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06848010
Lead sponsor
Policlinico Hospital
Responsible party
Giacomo Grasselli (Prof, Policlinico Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2025
Start date
Feb 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Irene Zainaghi, PhD
Contact
irene.zainaghi@policlinico.mi.it
+39 0255033275
Alberto Zanella, MD
study chair · Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion