CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00071513CAST-T/HSTSUpdated Aug 17, 2016Results posted

Middle School to High School Transition Project: Depression and Substance Abuse Prevention

A Phase 1 interventional study of CAST-T/HSTS and Brief Intervention in Depression and Substance-Related Disorders, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 15 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-17.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
497
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will implement a school-based program to prevent depression, academic failure, and substance use in at-risk adolescents transitioning from middle school to high school.

Read the detailed description

The transition from middle school to high school presents important challenges for adolescents. Programs that enhance personal efficacy and social support resources may prevent at-risk students from developing behaviors that can lead to substance use, academic failure, and depression. This study will implement a skills-based program called Coping and Support Training for the Transition (CAST-T) as a preventive intervention for at-risk students.

At-risk students in eighth grade will be randomly assigned to receive either CAST-T or school as usual. The CAST-T program will initially be delivered in twelve sessions over 6 weeks in the middle school setting. The program includes booster sessions, case management, structured home-based parent education, and support and skills training throughout the transition period. Participants will be assessed from the beginning of eighth grade to the end of ninth grade. Vulnerability to academic problems and depression will be assessed with school records and self-report scale scores.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Substance-Related Disorders

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Substance Abuse
  • At-risk
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,124 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 393 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 497 is above the median of 108 across 1,727 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • At-risk for substance abuse, academic failure, and depression
  • Enrolled in eighth grade in Seattle Public Schools
  • English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Score above the clinical cutoff on the Youth Self Report Aggressive subscale
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
497 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CAST-T/HSTS

    The CAST-T/HSTS condition combined the Brief Intervention and 12 school based small group sessions which taught skills to enhance personal control (to manage depression, anger, stress), self-esteem, decision making and interpersonal communications. HSTS skills groups were held in the spring of 8th grade with 4 one-on-one booster sessions delivered to the students as 9th graders by HSTP leaders; parents also participated in 4 sessions. HSTS objectives are: 1) to increase the acquisition of coping skills competencies by teaching and practicing strategies taught; 2) to increase social support resources by building a supportive network; 3) to increase the youth's engagement in positive social activities; and 4) to motivate parents to increase their support via parent educational sessions.

    Behavioral: CAST-T/HSTS

  • Active comparator
    Brief Intervention

    Brief Intervention: After each youth and parent completed baseline questionnaires the youth participated in a 1 on 1 standardized clinical follow-up with a trained clinician (blind to study condition) to review areas of concern, based on questionnaire responses including stressors at school, home, and with peers, level of support available and how to access support. The teen and clinician then planned a feedback call to parents, allowing teens to shape requests for support from parents as well as understand exactly what information would be shared with parents. Feedback call to parents reviewed concerns and made recommendations for services as needed. A similar procedure was followed after each assessment for all participants who indicated a risk of clinical depression or self-harm.

    Behavioral: Brief Intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralCAST-T/HSTS

    Skills training small group.

  • BehavioralBrief Intervention

    Assessment of needs and referral to services as needed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)

    The Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire is a 13 item measure of level of self reported depressive symptoms. Each item in scored on a 3-point Likert scale as follows: "True" (0), "Sometimes" (1), and "Not True" (2) rated within the timeframe of the previous two weeks. A total score is obtained; scores can range from 0 to 26. Total scores of 12 or higher may signify that a child/adolescent is suffering from depression. Higher scores on this scale suggest a worse outcome or greater endorsement of depressive symptoms. Change is measured based on two time points baseline to the 18 months follow-up assessment.

    Time frame: Baseline to 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. School Attachment

    School attachment measure consisted of 4 items. Item responses range from 0 (unsatisfied, rarely attended, not involved, etc.) to 6 (highly satisfied, regularly attended, very involved, etc). Scores could range from 0 to 36 with higher scores indicating more positive school attachment. Item were: My overall satisfaction with classes was... Overall, how safe did school feel last semester... Overall, how friendly did school feel... How involved were you in school activities...

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 17, 2016
Limitations and caveats
A significant limitation of this trial was the brief nature of the comparison condition, the Brief Intervention group; findings might reflect "dose" rather than content of the CAST-T/HSTS intervention.

Participant flow

8th graders in 6 middle schools completed the screening battery; those with 15+ on the Moods and Feelings Questionnaire and below the clinical cutoff on the Youth Self Report, Aggressive subscale were eligible. 716 met criteria; 497 were randomized. 123 families or youth declined; the rest could not be contacted.

Intervention Component
Participant flow — Intervention Component
MilestoneCAST-T/HSTSBrief Intervention
Started241256
Completed239253
Not completed23
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject23
Follow-up Assessment
Participant flow — Follow-up Assessment
MilestoneCAST-T/HSTSBrief Intervention
Started239253
Completed233247
Not completed66
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject66

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)

The Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire is a 13 item measure of level of self reported depressive symptoms. Each item in scored on a 3-point Likert scale as follows: "True" (0), "Sometimes" (1), and "Not True" (2) rated within the timeframe of the previous two weeks. A total score is obtained; scores can range from 0 to 26. Total scores of 12 or higher may signify that a child/adolescent is suffering from depression. Higher scores on this scale suggest a worse outcome or greater endorsement of depressive symptoms. Change is measured based on two time points baseline to the 18 months follow-up assessment.

Time frame:
Baseline to 18 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)
units on a scaleCAST-T/HSTSBrief Intervention
Change in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)2.19 ± 6.181.21 ± 6.40
Statistical analysis
  • CAST-T/HSTS vs Brief Intervention · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05
  • CAST-T/HSTS vs Brief Intervention · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.01
SecondarySchool Attachment

School attachment measure consisted of 4 items. Item responses range from 0 (unsatisfied, rarely attended, not involved, etc.) to 6 (highly satisfied, regularly attended, very involved, etc). Scores could range from 0 to 36 with higher scores indicating more positive school attachment. Item were: My overall satisfaction with classes was... Overall, how safe did school feel last semester... Overall, how friendly did school feel... How involved were you in school activities...

Time frame:
18 months
Reported as:
Mean · units of a scale
School Attachment
units of a scaleCAST-T/HSTSBrief Intervention
School Attachment4.53 ± 1.213.95 ± 1.31

Adverse events

Collected over 18 months, from initial screening which began in January of the 8th grade year to final follow-up assessments which were conducted in spring of the ith grade year (April to June) approximately 18 months later.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CAST-T/HSTS—0/241 (0%)0/241 (0%)
Brief Intervention—0/256 (0%)0/256 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCAST-T/HSTSBrief Intervention
Severe depression and/or suicidal risk requiring immediate interventionPsychiatric disorders0/2410/256

Baseline characteristics

All participants.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CAST-T/HSTSBrief InterventionTotal
<=18 years241256497
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CAST-T/HSTSBrief InterventionTotal
Mean13.5 ± 0.8313.65 ± 0.6713.57 ± 0.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CAST-T/HSTSBrief InterventionTotal
Female149165314
Male9291183
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CAST-T/HSTSBrief InterventionTotal
United States241256497
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lyon AR, Ludwig KA, Stoep AV, Gudmundsen G, McCauley E. Patterns and Predictors of Mental Healthcare Utilization in Schools and other Service Sectors among Adolescents at Risk for Depression. School Ment Health. 2013 Aug 1;5(3):10.1007/s12310-012-9097-6. doi: 10.1007/s12310-012-9097-6. PubMed 24223677 ↗
  • Banh MK, Crane PK, Rhew I, Gudmundsen G, Stoep AV, Lyon A, McCauley E. Measurement equivalence across racial/ethnic groups of the mood and feelings questionnaire for childhood depression. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Apr;40(3):353-67. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9569-4. PubMed 21996979 ↗
  • Rhew IC, Simpson K, Tracy M, Lymp J, McCauley E, Tsuang D, Stoep AV. Criterion validity of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire and one- and two-item depression screens in young adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2010 Feb 9;4(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-4-8. PubMed 20181135 ↗
  • Kuo E, Vander Stoep A, McCauley E, Kernic MA. Cost-effectiveness of a school-based emotional health screening program. J Sch Health. 2009 Jun;79(6):277-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00410.x. PubMed 19432868 ↗
  • McCormick E, Thompson K, Stoep AV, McCauley E. The Case for School-Based Depression Screening: Evidence From Established Programs. Rep Emot Behav Disord Youth. 2009 Fall;9(4):91-96. PubMed 26451134 ↗
  • Blossom JB, Adrian MC, Stoep AV, McCauley E. Mechanisms of Change in the Prevention of Depression: An Indicated School-Based Prevention Trial at the Transition to High School. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;59(4):541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 Jun 20. PubMed 31228560 ↗
  • Makover H, Adrian M, Wilks C, Read K, Stoep AV, McCauley E. Indicated Prevention for Depression at the Transition to High School: Outcomes for Depression and Anxiety. Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):499-509. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01005-5. PubMed 30852711 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Add data has been de-identified. De-identified data is available to share.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00071513
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Elizabeth McCauley (Professor, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2003
Start date
Mar 2003
Primary completion
Jun 2007
Completion
Jun 2007
Results posted
Aug 17, 2016
Last update
Aug 17, 2016

Study contacts

Elizabeth McCauley, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington
Ann Vander Stoep, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion