ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00014833Updated Apr 12, 2016

Life Course Socioeconomic Status, Social Context and Cardiovascular Disease

An observational study in Atherosclerosis, Coronary Disease and Cardiovascular Diseases, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed. Open to participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-12.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
15,872
Ages
Up to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the inverse association between socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study cohort.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

It is well known that cardiovascular disease is inversely associated with SES. However, SES may change over time and for socially mobile individuals it is not clear whether the association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) differs for early life SES vs. mid-life SES. Another issue is that an individual may have a relatively high income and/or wealth, but may live in a low SES neighborhood. It would be desirable to separate out the effects of individual level vs. aggregate level SES. Finally, there is limited evidence that the association of SES with CVD may vary according to ethnic group. The bi-ethnic character of the ARIC population makes it a fertile environment to test this hypothesis.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Mechanisms will be identified which explain the strong inverse association between socioeconomic status (SES) over the life course and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) , a bi-ethnic population-based sample of four U.S. communities. Health outcomes will include non-invasively measured subclinical cardiovascular disease, as well as fatal and non-fatal clinical disease manifestations ascertained over the course of 10 years of follow-up. Earlier life course socioeconomic status and measurements of current socioeconomic status and biomedical cardiovascular risk factors will be integrated with geocoded contemporary social environmental exposures to assess their impact on cardiovascular function, metabolic impairments, allostatic load, and subclinical and clinical disease. Multilevel analyses will be performed with the goal of identifying pathways by which socioeconomic status is related to cardiovascular disease, considering relevant health behavior, life styles, psychosocial stressors/support mechanisms, chronic infection/chronic inflammatory burden, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, and sustained metabolic impairments. The potential modification of the above associations by the social environment will be addressed by these analyses, as well as putative differences by gender and ethnicity.

These staged analytic goals are made possible by linking Census-based indicators of the social environment to the rich data resources of the ARIC Study, a bi-ethnic, community-based sample of men and women aged 45-64 years at the time of their baseline examination in 1987-1989. This cohort was re-examined every three years through January, 1999 with ascertainment of SES during childhood, early adulthood and in mid-life, health-relevant behaviors, numerous measurements of risk factors, and measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease such as carotid artery wall thickness, arterial distensibility, retinopathy, and lower extremity arterial disease. These data, as well as validated information on hospital discharge diagnoses and on cause-specific mortality accrued over 10 years of follow-up are available. Additional life course information on the members of the ARIC cohort will be collected during Year 1 of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atherosclerosis
  • Coronary Disease
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
03

In context

Atherosclerosis

1,596 studies on the registry are indexed under Atherosclerosis; 262 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15,872 is above the median of 230 across 581 observational studies indexed under Atherosclerosis.

Browse Atherosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,366 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

No eligibility criteria

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
15,872 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    No intervention

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Borrell LN, Diez Roux AV, Rose K, Catellier D, Clark BL; Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Neighbourhood characteristics and mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;33(2):398-407. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh063. PubMed 15082648 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data shared through LOINCC and directly by request to the PI

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 12, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00014833
Responsible party
Gerardo Heiss (Professor, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 12, 2001
Start date
Mar 2001
Primary completion
Feb 2006
Completion
Feb 2006
Last update
Apr 12, 2016

Study contacts

Gerardo Heiss
University of North Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion