CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00005272Updated Jan 28, 2016

Smoking and Body Weight: Analysis of HHANES

An observational study in Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, sponsored by University of Memphis. Completed. Open to male participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-28.

Sponsored by University of Memphis · Observational

Study type
Observational
Ages
Up to 100 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

To evaluate the relationships between smoking rate, gender, and body weight in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination I Survey (HHANES) I. Also, to evaluate the independent and additive contribution of smoking rate and fasting glucose on body weight in HHANES I and NHANES II.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

The study was supported by the Small Grants Program established by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in January 1990 to provide limited support to extend analyses of research data generated by clinical trials, population research, and demonstration and education research studies.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The first study used HHANES I data and analysis of variance to determine the possible body composition differences between subgroups of gender and smoking categories. Caloric differences in dietary intake were analyzed in a second ANOVA design.

The second study used data from HHANES I and NHANES II to evaluate the independent and additive or synergistic contribution of smoking rate and fasting glucose on body weight.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Heart Diseases
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

4,904 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 919 are open to participants now.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Memphis is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

No eligibility criteria

05

Study design

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Meyers AW. Relationship of smoking status, energy balance, and body weight: analysis of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Dec;59(6):899-905. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.6.899. PubMed 1774374 ↗
  • Klesges RC, Ray JW, Klesges LM. Caffeinated coffee and tea intake and its relationship to cigarette smoking: an analysis of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). J Subst Abuse. 1994;6(4):407-18. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(94)90334-4. PubMed 7780298 ↗
  • Klesges RC, Klesges LM. The relationship between body mass and cigarette smoking using a biochemical index of smoking exposure. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993 Oct;17(10):585-91. PubMed 8242127 ↗
  • Klesges RC, Debon M, Ray JW. Are self-reports of smoking rate biased? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Oct;48(10):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00020-5. PubMed 7561984 ↗
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00005272
Lead sponsor
University of Memphis
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
First posted
May 26, 2000
Start date
Sep 1990
Completion
Sep 1992
Last update
Jan 28, 2016
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2000. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion