ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00005256Updated Feb 18, 2016

Coronary Screening in a High Risk Subset

An observational study in Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease and Heart Diseases, sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Completed. Open to male participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-18.

Sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Ages
Up to 100 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

To test the hypothesis that the incidence of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality could be accurately predicted by the presence of coronary calcific deposits detected by cardiac fluoroscopy.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Because of its low cost and non-invasive nature, fluoroscopy was thought to be a potentially powerful screening tool for coronary heart disease if its efficiency could be demonstrated. The utility of exercise testing for screening had been limited by its relatively low sensitivity since it could only detect atherosclerotic plaque large enough to significantly impede coronary flow.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Asymptomatic high risk subjects were screened with cardiac fluoroscopy and exercise testing at baseline and followed for six years with annual visits. The sensitivity and specificity of fluoroscopy in relation to the incidence of coronary heart disease and the incidence of cardiovascular mortality was determined and compared at 3.5 and 6 years of follow-up. The predictive utility of fluoroscopy and exercise testing, in relation to the incidence of coronary events, was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis was also performed on baseline risk factors.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Coronary Disease
  • Heart Diseases
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 930 are open to participants now.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) is the lead sponsor of 1,143 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Of its 58 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 50 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

No eligibility criteria

05

Study design

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Detrano RC, Wong ND, French WJ, Tang W, Georgiou D, Young E, Brezden OS, Doherty T, Brundage BH. Prevalence of fluoroscopic coronary calcific deposits in high-risk asymptomatic persons. Am Heart J. 1994 Jun;127(6):1526-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90381-6. PubMed 8197979 ↗
  • Detrano RC, Wong ND, Tang W, French WJ, Georgiou D, Young E, Brezden OS, Doherty TM, Narahara KA, Brundage BH. Prognostic significance of cardiac cinefluoroscopy for coronary calcific deposits in asymptomatic high risk subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Aug;24(2):354-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90287-9. PubMed 8034867 ↗
  • Doherty TM, Tang W, Dascalos S, Watson KE, Demer LL, Shavelle RM, Detrano RC. Ethnic origin and serum levels of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 are independent predictors of coronary calcium mass measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation. 1997 Sep 2;96(5):1477-81. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1477. PubMed 9315534 ↗
  • Secci A, Wong N, Tang W, Wang S, Doherty T, Detrano R. Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events: comparison of two protocols. Circulation. 1997 Aug 19;96(4):1122-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1122. PubMed 9286939 ↗
  • Detrano RC, Wong ND, Doherty TM, Shavelle R. Prognostic significance of coronary calcific deposits in asymptomatic high-risk subjects. Am J Med. 1997 Apr;102(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00085-5. PubMed 9217615 ↗
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 1990 and a completion of Aug 1996. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 25, 2000
First posted
May 26, 2000
Start
May 1990
CompletionActual
Aug 1996
Last update
Feb 18, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00005256
First posted
May 26, 2000
Start date
May 1990
Completion
Aug 1996
Last update
Feb 18, 2016
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2000. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion