CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00002283Updated Jun 24, 2005

A Comparison of Dapsone and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia (PCP) in Patients With AIDS

An interventional study of Trimethoprim and Sulfamethoxazole in Pneumonia, Pneumocystis Carinii and HIV Infections, sponsored by Jacobus Pharmaceutical. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2005-06-24.

Sponsored by Jacobus Pharmaceutical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluate the effectiveness rate of dapsone plus trimethoprim as a therapy for the first episode of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. Compare the rates and severity of adverse effects using dapsone versus trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazole (TMP / PurposeX). Establish relative toxicities with regard to suitability for outpatient treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pneumonia, Pneumocystis Carinii
  • HIV Infections

Keywords

  • Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination
  • AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections
  • Pneumonia, Pneumocystis carinii
  • Dapsone
  • Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Jacobus Pharmaceutical is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Concurrent Medication:

Excluded:

  • Requirement for other medications found to be effective in the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) (i.e., DFMO, pyrimethamine, and sulfadiazine).

Patients with the following are excluded:

  • History of allergic reaction to dapsone.
  • Requirement for other medications found to be effective in the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) (i.e., DFMO, pyrimethamine, and sulfadiazine).
  • Patients subsequently found to be glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) positive will be withdrawn from the study and treated with another regimen.

Prior Medication:

Excluded:

  • Requirement for other medications found to be effective in the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) (i.e., DFMO, pyrimethamine, and sulfadiazine).

Patients who are glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) positive will be withdrawn from the study and treated with another regimen.

Hospitalized patients with first episode of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) documented by GIEMSA or methenamine stain.

  • Patients must:
  • Be willing and able to give informed consent.
  • Be expected to survive 1 week without therapy.
  • Have less than 48 hours of treatment for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) for this episode.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized

Interventions

  • DrugTrimethoprim
  • DrugSulfamethoxazole
  • DrugDapsone
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Jacobus Pharmaceutical Co
    Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2005, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00002283
Lead sponsor
Jacobus Pharmaceutical
First posted
Aug 31, 2001
Last update
Jun 24, 2005
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 1989. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion