ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00001265Updated Apr 17, 2024

Study and Treatment of Inflammatory Muscle Diseases

An observational study in Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis, sponsored by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-17.

Sponsored by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,325
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study of inflammatory muscle diseases-polymyositis and dermatomyositis and related disorders-will examine what causes these diseases and describe the clinical features (signs and symptoms) associated with them. Inflammation and degeneration of skeletal muscles in these disorders leads to weakness and muscle wasting. The skin, lungs and other organs may also be involved.

Patients 16 years of age and older with polymyositis, dermatomyositis, or a related disorder may be eligible for this study. Participants will undergo a complete history and physical examination, including routine blood and urine tests. Additional procedures for diagnosis, treatment or research may include:

  1. Blood sample for genetic studies.
  2. Muscle biopsy-removal of a tissue sample for microscopic examination. Under local anesthetic, a 1/2- to 1-inch long incision is made in the thigh or upper arm, and a small piece of muscle is removed.
  3. Electromyography-measurement of the electrical activity of a muscle. A needle is inserted through the skin into a muscle to record its electrical activity.
  4. Magnetic resonance imaging-visualization of organs or tissues, using a magnetic field and radio waves. The patient lies on a table inside a narrow cylinder (the MRI scanner) with a strong magnetic field for the scanning.
  5. Manual muscle strength testing by a physiotherapist.
  6. Swallowing studies using ultrasound (imaging using sound waves) and X-rays (barium swallow) to evaluate swallowing and speaking abilities.
  7. Questionnaires on swallowing ability and ability to perform daily living activities
  8. Pulmonary function tests-measurement of movement of air in and out of the lungs. The patient breathes into a machine to evaluate lung function.
  9. Chest X-rays to evaluate lung function.
  10. Electrocardiogram and, if necessary, Holter monitoring (measurement of the electrical activity of the heart) and echocardiogram (ultrasound imaging of the heart) to evaluate heart function.
  11. Apheresis-collection of white blood cells for research. Whole blood is collected through a needle placed in an arm vein. The blood circulates through a machine that separates it into its components. The white cells are removed and the rest of the blood is returned to the body through the same needle or through a second one placed in the other arm.
  12. MR guided muscle biopsy-measurement of glycogen in muscle tissue using magnetic resonance imaging. Certain patients may undergo this experimental procedure to compare MRI findings with those of muscle biopsy. The affected muscles are identified using MRI and the biopsy incision is made. MRI is then used to guide the biopsy needle to the muscle and a small piece is removed.

Patients who are eligible for experimental treatment studies will be offered the opportunity to join them. Others will be advised of treatment recommendations.

Read the detailed description

Polymyositis, dermatomyositis and related disorders, also known as the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), are an uncommon, heterogeneous group of diseases. This is an omnibus protocol designed to continue our description of this rare group of diseases, further delineate important groups of patients, and obtain useful material for further study of immunological abnormalities, pathogenesis and etiology of IIM. Often the diagnosis of an IIM can be confused with other illness (such as adult-onset dystrophies), and therefore, we will be evaluating patients with other illnesses (who are referred with a preliminary diagnosis of an IIM) (1). Patients evaluated with IIM will receive (with informed consent) the best standard therapies available and consideration for entry into any therapeutic protocols. MRI will be performed on healthy volunteers to help develop a mathematical method for quantitating edema of muscle MRI in patients (2). MRI/PET will be performed on some patients and on healthy volunteers to evaluate its role in understanding muscle disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatomyositis
  • Polymyositis

Keywords

  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies
  • Dermatomyositis
  • Inclusion Body Myositis
  • Pathogenesis
  • Natural History
  • Connective Tissue Diseases
03

In context

Dermatomyositis

184 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatomyositis; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,325 is above the median of 179 across 45 observational studies indexed under Dermatomyositis.

Browse Dermatomyositis studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy Volunteers and patients with known or suspected Idiopathic Inflammatory myopathies (IIM)

Eligibility criteria

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

All eligible patients are invited to participate in this protocol. Patients are adults and minors, aged 16 or higher, with possible idiopathic muscle disease (suspected or confirmed). Since both men and women are affected with the disease, both sexes will be studied. All ethnic and racial groups are at risk and will be included. Pregnant women and women who intend to become pregnant during the study will be eligible since this disease affects both segments of the population. This protocol proposes responsible inclusion of pregnant women and the justification for this derives in part from the fact that women (who are suffering from and rheumatic diseases) lack data from which to make informed decisions about health care during pregnancy.

INCLUSION OF PREGNANT WOMEN:

The majority of patients with autoimmune disease are women and of these individuals, the majority are of childbearing age. Furthermore, pregnancy is a risk factor for fluctuations in autoimmune disease activity, including organ- and life- threatening flares. The majority of our study population is comprised of women. The exclusion of women who become pregnant from systemic study by way of our natural history protocol, threatens both the well-being of the individual women (owing to the standard of care provision of the protocol) and the systematic discovery of pregnancy-specific data concerning the immunopathological basis of autoimmune disease. Skewed understanding from a restricted natural history study may leave vulnerable groups open to disproportionate harm owing to inequities in research. In other words, automatic disqualification due to pregnancy denies women agency in the issue of gender equity for access to research and in addition the systematic exclusion of pregnant women prevents generalizability of information to help under-resourced and marginalized populations, nationwide.

In summary,

  • The cost of exclusion of pregnant women with myositis 1) insufficient evidence concerning how to manage such disease for the population, and 2) lack of access to the best myositis specific advice for individuals enrolled in the protocol who are unlikely to have access to specialty care outside of the NIH
  • The cost of exclusion in research with regard to fetal safety derives from the fact that preeclampsia, eclampsia, preterm birth and miscarriage are higher in women who do not have access to subspecialty care. In this situation, reticence on the part of nonspecialists to treat active autoimmune disease during pregnancy or lack of access to appropriate treatment may lead to harm to women and their fetuses.
  • The pregnant body possesses a unique hormonal and immunological environment. Similarly, it metabolizes medications in a manner different from non-pregnant women, let alone men. Hence, there is no reasonable path towards generating important biomedical knowledge other than to include pregnant women in this protocol.

The tension between protection by exclusion and the presumption of inclusion in research protocols has been specifically addressed by the US Institute of Medicine (now National Academy of Medicine) and the Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women to advise the Secretary of Health and Human Services regarding gaps in knowledge and research on safe and effective therapies for pregnant and lactating women, and both have both weighed in as favoring the presumption of inclusion (https://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/advisory/PRGLAC). Our study falls in line with these position papers since it is responsible (it benefits, patients and their fetuses and provides relevant data to the population at large) and because it is low risk (it is standard of care, only, and does not invoke experimental interventions).

Healthy volunteers will be eligible only if they are adults aged 18 or older and only if they are willing to provide . There is no benefit to the healthy volunteers; however their inclusion will provide invaluable information in comparison to the patients for the purpose of research. Recruitment of healthy volunteers has been completed.

Participation of NIH Staff or family members of study team members

NIH staff and family members of study team members may be enrolled in this study as this population meets the study entry criteria. Neither participation nor refusal to participate as a subject in the research will have an effect, either beneficial or adverse, on the participant s employment or position at NIH.

Every effort will be made to protect participant information, but such information may be available in medical records and may be available to authorized users outside of the study team in both an identifiable an unidentifiable manner.

The NIH Information Sheet on NIH Staff Research Participation will be made available. Please see section for consent of NIH Staff.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Children (age less than 16 years) are excluded
  • Subjects with severe active infection (such as requiring intravenous antibiotics) or other co-morbidities that in the opinion of the investigator would warrant exclusion.
  • Subjects or their legal guardians who are unable or unwilling to give informed consent/assent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,325 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy Volunteers

    Patients with no disease

  • Patients with muscle disease

    Patients with known or suspected Idiopathic Inflammatory myopathies (IIM)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle strength

    To determine its utility in differentiating different muscle diseases, in identifying early extra muscular involvement of muscle diseases, in characterizing the pattern of muscle involvement for the diseases studied, and whether it can serve as a diagnostic tool to better identify muscle inflammation and atrophy.

    Time frame: End of Study

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — .At this time, It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available . The protocol is silent about IPD sharing.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 1992 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 386 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 1999
First posted
Nov 4, 1999
StartActual
Jan 10, 1992
Primary completionActual
Apr 5, 2024
CompletionActual
Apr 5, 2024
Last update
Apr 17, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00001265
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 1999
Start date
Jan 10, 1992
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2024
Completion
Apr 5, 2024
Last update
Apr 17, 2024

Study contacts

Andrew L Mammen, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion