A Phase 2 interventional study of Exercise intervention in Osteoporosis, sponsored by Oregon State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 10 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-09.
Sponsored by Oregon State University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention
In this study we will investigate the effects of a high-impact exercise program involving jumping on bone mass (the amount of bone) of the hip and backbone in the growing skeleton. We will also look at the effects of gradually stopping the jumping program on bone mass in the growing skeleton. A high-impact exercise program may build more bone during childhood, while the skeleton is still growing. This may help prevent broken bones due to loss of bone mass later in life.
We will recruit 200 children aged 5-10 to participate in the study. For 6 months we will train the children in either a jumping or stretching program. We will then gradually reduce the amount of exercise over 6 months. We will measure bone mass in the hip and backbone at the start of the study, after jumping, and 6 months after the jumping program is stopped. We will compare the results in the jumping and stretching groups.
Osteoporotic fractures are increasing at an alarming rate in this country and result in over 13 billion dollars in health costs annually. Peak bone mass, that is, an individual's maximum bone mass at the completion of skeletal acquisition, is an important determinant of fracture risk. Thus, maximizing peak bone mass may provide an effective strategy for preventing osteopenia and osteoporosis.
Various investigators have postulated that increasing bone mass by 3-5 percent would reduce fracture risk by 20-30 percent. Our data in collegiate female gymnasts demonstrate hip and spine bone mineral density values of up to 40 percent above values in normal age-matched controls and elite runners, despite menstrual irregularities. Further, we have observed the dynamic response of bone to high-impact forces in gymnasts over the training season as bone increases of 2-5 percent.
This is a randomized, controlled exercise intervention designed to evaluate the effect of high-impact loading as a means to increase bone mass during development. It will determine bone mass accrual and bone geometry at the lumbar spine and proximal femur in prepubescent girls and boys. Further, this study will evaluate the bone response from withdrawal of the stimulus over 6 months.
We will recruit 200 pre-pubescent children during two separate years and randomly assign them to a jumping or a stretching group. The jumping group will perform double leg jumps and the stretching group will act as a control. Outcome variables include bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and hip, estimated bone volumetric density at the spine, and cross-sectional geometry of the femoral neck and diaphysis.
Implementing a specific bone-loading program during childhood will potentially allow the bone to increase both its mass and mineralization at an earlier age and therefore provide a larger foundation of mineralization for further growth throughout adolescence until skeletal maturity is reached. We expect our findings to provide a basis for the design of strategies to build bone during growth and thereby reduce osteoporotic fractures.
1,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 212 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 95 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis.
Browse Osteoporosis studies →Oregon State University is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (67%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Oregon State University