ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07935915DXACTUpdated Nov 13, 2026

Bone Deterioration After Kidney Transplantation Assessed by DXA and HR-pQCT

An observational study in Kidney Transplantation, Bone Loss and Osteoporosis, sponsored by Medical University Innsbruck. Recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-13.

Sponsored by Medical University Innsbruck · Observational

Updated Nov 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn how bone health changes during the first year after kidney transplantation in adults receiving their first kidney transplant.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How many patients show a clinically relevant decline in bone density or bone structure within 12 months after transplantation?
  • Does a standard bone density scan (DXA) detect these changes as well as a high-resolution scan of bone structure (HR-pQCT)?

Participants will:

  • Have a DXA scan of the lower spine, hip and forearm and an HR-pQCT scan of the forearm and lower leg shortly after transplantation and again after 12 months. Participants followed up in Innsbruck may also have these scans after 6 months.
  • Give blood and urine samples at the same visits, taken together with routine blood tests whenever possible, for bone and mineral markers and storage in a biobank.

The study does not change any treatment. All treatment decisions remain with the patients' physicians.

Read the detailed description

Bone mineral density declines rapidly during the first 6-12 months after kidney transplantation, driven by glucocorticoid exposure, persistent chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and changes in bone turnover. This period coincides with the highest fracture risk. DXA-scans provide areal bone mineral density only and cannot distinguish cortical from trabecular bone or assess microarchitecture, so it may underestimate early cortical deterioration. HR-pQCT measures volumetric bone mineral density, cortical and trabecular microarchitecture and, by finite element analysis, estimated bone strength.

DXACT is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-centre observational cohort study at the Medical University of Innsbruck. Baseline clinical and laboratory assessment is performed 7 +/- 2 days and imaging 10 +/- 7 days after transplantation; assessments are repeated at 12 months, with an optional 6-month visit for participants followed locally. HR-pQCT is performed at the distal radius and distal tibia of the dominant side (contralateral side if a vascular access or implant is present); DXA at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), hip and distal radius (33%).

Clinically relevant skeletal deterioration is defined as a change exceeding the least significant change (LSC = 2.77 x precision CV) of the respective modality and parameter. Laboratory assessments include parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxy- and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, calcium, phosphate, P1NP, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, TRAP5b, CTX, osteocalcin and osteoprotegerin. EDTA plasma and urine are stored in a pseudonymised biobank at -80 °C.

Analyses are primarily descriptive and exploratory. Planned analyses include agreement and discordance between DXA- and HR-pQCT-based classification, associations of imaging changes with biochemical markers and clinical factors (age, sex, dialysis vintage, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, rejection, graft function), and comparison by graft function at 12 months. Incident fragility fractures beyond 12 months may be retrieved from routine clinical records without further participant contact.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplantation
  • Bone Loss
  • Osteoporosis
  • Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD)

Keywords

  • HR-pQCT
  • DXA
  • Bone Microarchitecture
  • Bone Mineral Density
  • Fracture Risk
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Cortical Porosity
03

In context

Bone Diseases, Metabolic

662 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Diseases, Metabolic; 94 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 80 across 139 observational studies indexed under Bone Diseases, Metabolic.

Browse Bone Diseases, Metabolic studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University Innsbruck is the lead sponsor of 187 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult recipients of a first kidney transplant (living or deceased donor) treated at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria, who are approached by the study team within 10 days after transplantation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older at the time of kidney transplantation
  • First kidney transplantation (living or deceased donor)
  • Ability and willingness to provide written
  • Enrolment possible within 10 days after kidney transplantation
  • Clinical stability sufficient to undergo imaging procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous kidney transplantation
  • Prior or ongoing treatment with antiresorptive or osteoanabolic therapies (e.g. bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide) at the time of transplantation
  • Conditions precluding reliable bone imaging, including metal implants at the measurement sites
  • to HR-pQCT or DXA
  • Inability to undergo imaging due to physical or technical limitations
  • Known metabolic bone diseases unrelated to chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD)
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with study participation, data quality or protocol adherence
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Kidney transplant recipients

    Adults (18 years or older) who received a first kidney transplant (living or deceased donor) at the Medical University of Innsbruck and are enrolled within 10 days after transplantation.

    Diagnostic Test: DXA and HR-pQCT · Other: Blood and urine sampling

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDXA and HR-pQCT

    Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4), hip and distal radius (33%) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the distal radius and distal tibia, performed at baseline (10 +/- 7 days after kidney transplantation) and at 12 months, with an optional 6-month visit. Imaging is used for research only; no treatment is assigned.

    Also known as: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography

  • OtherBlood and urine sampling

    Blood and urine samples at each study visit, taken together with routine blood draws, for markers of bone and mineral metabolism and storage in a biobank.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Clinically Relevant Skeletal Deterioration on HR-pQCT

    Deterioration exceeding the least significant change (LSC = 2.77 x precision CV) in at least one of cortical thickness, cortical porosity or finite element-derived failure load at the distal radius or distal tibia.

    Time frame: Baseline (10 +/- 7 days after transplantation) to 12 months

  2. Proportion of Participants With Clinically Relevant Skeletal Deterioration on DXA

    Decrease in areal bone mineral density exceeding the site-specific least significant change at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), hip or distal radius (33%).

    Time frame: Baseline (10 +/- 7 days after transplantation) to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Cortical Thickness

    Absolute (mm) and relative (%) change in cortical thickness at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  2. Change in Cortical Porosity

    Absolute (percentage points) and relative change in cortical porosity at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  3. Change in Total Volumetric BMD

    Absolute (mg HA/cm³) and relative (%) change in total volumetric bone mineral density at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  4. Change in Cortical Volumetric BMD

    Absolute (mg HA/cm³) and relative (%) change in cortical volumetric bone mineral density at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  5. Change in Trabecular Volumetric BMD

    Absolute (mg HA/cm³) and relative (%) change in trabecular volumetric bone mineral density at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  6. Change in Trabecular Number

    Absolute (1/mm) and relative (%) change in trabecular number at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  7. Change in Trabecular Thickness

    Absolute (mm) and relative (%) change in trabecular thickness at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  8. Change in Trabecular Separation

    Absolute (mm) and relative (%) change in trabecular separation at the distal radius and distal tibia measured by HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  9. Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone and Mineral Metabolism

    Change in parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, calcium, phosphate, P1NP, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, TRAP5b, CTX, osteocalcin and osteoprotegerin

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  10. Change in Estimated Bone Strength (Failure Load)

    Absolute and relative change in finite element-derived failure load (N) at the distal radius and distal tibia.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  11. Change in Areal Bone Mineral Density

    Absolute and relative change in areal BMD (g/cm2) at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip, femoral neck and distal radius (33%) measured by DXA.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  12. Skeletal Changes by Graft Function

    Comparison of HR-pQCT and DXA changes between participants with eGFR \>= 60 and \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPI 2021) at 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Discordance Between DXA and HR-pQCT Classification

    Proportion of participants classified differently by DXA and HR-pQCT, in particular stable DXA with deterioration on HR-pQCT.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Association of Dialysis Vintage With Skeletal Deterioration

    Pre-transplant dialysis duration (continuous; pre-emptive, \< 12, \>= 12 months) as predictor of imaging-derived skeletal changes.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  3. Incident Fragility Fractures

    Fragility fractures retrieved from routine clinical records without participant contact.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years after transplantation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jorgensen HS, Behets G, Bammens B, Claes K, Meijers B, Naesens M, Sprangers B, Kuypers DRJ, Cavalier E, D'Haese P, Evenepoel P. Natural History of Bone Disease following Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Mar;33(3):638-652. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021081081. Epub 2022 Jan 19. PubMed 35046132 ↗
  • Evenepoel P, Claes K, Meijers B, Laurent MR, Bammens B, Naesens M, Sprangers B, Pottel H, Cavalier E, Kuypers D. Bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and incident fractures in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2019 Jun;95(6):1461-1470. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.024. Epub 2019 Mar 4. PubMed 30922664 ↗
  • Untersulzner C, Pirklbauer M, Evenepoel P, Zoller H, Kronbichler A. Bone Mineral Density Loss After Kidney Transplantation: Metabolic Determinants, Diagnostic Approaches, and Preventive Strategies. Kidney Int Rep. 2026 Jun 30;11(9):106685. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2026.106685. eCollection 2026 Sep. PubMed 42534417 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly, as participant consent does not cover transfer to third parties. De-identified data may be made available by the study lead upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the ethics committee and data protection regulations.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2029, 38 months after the start.

Of 52 non-industry observational studies under Bone Diseases, Metabolic, half reached primary completion within 60 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19. This study's planned 38 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 53 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 19.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 28, 2026
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
StartActual
Oct 21, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Nov 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07935915
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
Start date
Oct 21, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 13, 2026

Study contacts

Clemens Untersulzner, MD
Contact
clemens.untersulzner@i-med.ac.at
+43 50504 84848
Andreas Kronbichler, MD, PhD
Contact
andreas.kronbichler@i-med.ac.at
+43 50504 25855
Andreas Kronbichler, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Medical University Innsbruck

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion