ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07933718DPO - OMUpdated Nov 12, 2026

Effect of Redon-type Drains on Postoperative Edema Following Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery: a Randomized, Controlled Superiority Trial With Two Parallel Arms

An interventional study of Orthognathic surgery and standard postoperative care in Orthognathic Surgical Procedures, Drainage and Oedema, sponsored by University Hospital, Tours. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Tours · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Nov 12, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 36 studies in Edema with a site in France — 7 open to participants now, 7 under way, none of them phase 3. Edema · France.

Planned enrollment
12th of 17
72 · median 104
Started
2026
the only one that year
No phase
11 of 36
3 open now
Registered
36th of 36
by date

Among the 36 studies in Edema with a site in France, this one is the 12th largest by planned enrollment of the 17 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 11 with no phase, and was the 36th registered.

Edema

567 studies on the registry are indexed under Edema; 96 are open to participants now.

Browse Edema studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 36 studies in Edema with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

All 7 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 56 Edema studies recruiting now, 34 (61%) set no upper age limit and 16 (29%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 4 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 15 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 36 studies in Edema with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Orthognathic surgery involves the maxillary and/or mandibular skeletal bases; it entails maxillary and/or mandibular osteotomies (such as sagittal split osteotomies of the mandibular rami) aimed at restoring normal maxillomandibular skeletal and dento-occlusal relationships in patients with maxillomandibular dysmorphosis. These deformities give rise to morphological, aesthetic, and functional abnormalities that can be severe (e.g., respiratory issues, temporomandibular joint pain). Postoperative edema is inevitable following orthognathic surgery; it can be significant, causing pain and discomfort while delaying patient recovery and hospital discharge. The use of Redon-type drains for mandibular osteotomies is not a standard practice across surgical teams due to a lack of consensus. The only available data come from studies with methodologies that do not allow for a definitive conclusion regarding the superiority of using-or not using-postoperative Redon drains (Lee et al. 2020), and no clinical trials have investigated this issue. This project aims to evaluate the impact of Redon-type drainage in mandibular osteotomies (sagittal split osteotomies of the mandibular rami), whether or not combined with genioplasty (osteotomy of the mental symphysis). We hypothesize that drainage using Redon-type drains for 6 hours in the immediate postoperative period following mandibular osteotomies significantly reduces postoperative edema.

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the superiority-in terms of reducing postoperative edema at day 2-of placing Redon-type drains for 6 hours immediately following sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular rami (in addition to standard postoperative care) compared to standard postoperative care alone, without a drainage device.

Hypothesis: Demonstrating that the use of Redon-type drains following orthognathic surgery osteotomies reduces postoperative edema, pain, and discomfort would provide a rational basis for this practice and support its routine implementation. The expected benefits are twofold, impacting both patients and public health. For patients, the anticipated benefits include reduced postoperative discomfort and pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays, with the future prospect of outpatient care.

03

Conditions studied

  • Orthognathic Surgical Procedures
  • Drainage
  • Oedema

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • orthognathic surgery
  • sagittal split osteotomy
  • surgical drainage
  • drain
  • oedema
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 15 years or older
  • Undergoing mandibular osteotomies, with or without genioplasty, with or without wisdom tooth extraction (maxillary and/or mandibular)
  • obtained from the adult patient, or from the holder(s) of parental authority if the patient is a minor*
  • Enrolled in a French social security program

    • When both holders of parental authority cannot give joint consent, the consent of a single legal representative may be obtained in situations provided for by regulations or duly justified and documented in the source file.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of maxillomandibular bone surgery
  • Coagulation disorder
  • Thrombophilia
  • Patients on anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents
  • Patients with a constitutional bone disorder
  • Patients with a syndromic craniofacial malformation
  • Absolute or relative to treatment with
  • Pregnant (urine test) or breastfeeding women
  • Patients under legal guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial protection
  • Contraindications to the procedure
  • Patients who have taken corticosteroids or NSAIDs on the day before the procedure (D-1).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    experimental arm

    with drains placed at the end of the procedure, in addition to standard postoperative care. These will be Redon drains with an outlet that is either intraoral or transcutaneous in the cervical region, depending on the participating center's practices (intraoral transmucosal in the Tours and Angers centers or transcutaneous in the Nantes center); these drains will be removed 6 hours after placement Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

    Procedure: Orthognathic surgery

  • Active comparator
    control arm

    which consists of not placing any drainage device immediately after surgery, with standard postoperative care identical to that of the experimental group.

    Other: standard postoperative care

Interventions

  • ProcedureOrthognathic surgery

    in which drains are placed at the end of the procedure, in addition to standard postoperative care.

  • Otherstandard postoperative care

    not placing any drainage device immediately after surgery, with standard postoperative care identical

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative swelling

    The primary outcome will be the post operative facial swelling 48 hours after the end of the surgical procedure (randomization will be at this timepoint) measured with cervicofacial linear measurements

    Time frame: Cervicofacial linear measurement will be collected 48 hours after the randomization (day 2) and at month 3. As the facial skeletal anatomy will be modified by the surgical procedure, month 3 will be considered as the baseline measurement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative swelling

    Postoperative swelling at other time points than for the primary outcome, measured with cervico facial linear measurements

    Time frame: Cervicofacial linear measurement will be collected at 6 hours after randomization, 24 hours after randomization (day 1) and at day 7

  2. Postoperative swelling

    Postoperative swelling using 3D photogrammetry instead of cervicofacial linear measurements

    Time frame: It will be collected 24 hours after randomization (day 1) , at day 2, at day 7 and at month 3

  3. Pain intensity

    Pain will be measured using a visual analog scale where 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 to unbearable pain

    Time frame: Pain will be collected 6 hours after randomization, at day 1 (24 hours after randomization), at day 2 and at day 7

  4. Aesthetic discomfort

    Aesthetic discomfort will be measured using a visual analog scale with 0 indicating no discomfort and 10 corresponding to an extremely uncomfortable feeling

    Time frame: It will be collected 6 hours after randomization, at day 1 (24 hours after randomization), at day 2 and at day 7

  5. Breathing discomfort

    Breathing discomfort will be measured using a visual analog scale where 0 corresponds to no discomfort and 10 to extremely bothersome

    Time frame: It will be collected 6 hours after randomization, at day 1 (24 hours after randomization), at day 2 and at day 7

  6. Swallowing discomfort

    Swallowing discomfort will be measured using a visual analog scale where 0 corresponds to no discomfort and 10 to extremely bothersome

    Time frame: It will be collected 6 hours after randomization, at day 1 (24 hours after randomization), at day 2 and at day 7

  7. Pain during redon drain removal

    Pain during redon drain removal will be collected for participants of the experimental group after redon drain removal

    Time frame: It will be collected 6 hours after randomization, at time to redon removal.

  8. The daily bed rest in hours

    It corresponds to how long, in hours, the participant stays in his bed each day.

    Time frame: It will be collected at day 1 and at day 2 (how long the participant stay in his bed in the last 24 hours) as well as at day 7 (how long the participants stay in his bed each day of the last 4 days).

  9. The general well-being

    General well-being will be assessed using the GHQ-28 self-assessment questionnaire. The GHQ-28 is a questionnaire with 28 items and with scores ranging from 0 - indicating no deterioration in well-being - to 84 - indicating a significant deterioration in well-being.

    Time frame: It will be collected at day 7 and at month 3

  10. The length of hospital stay

    It corresponds to the lenght of the hospital stay, in days (a maximum of 90 days)

    Time frame: a maximum of 90 days

  11. Postoperative adverse events

    Postoperative adverse events correspond to hematoma, pre-thoracic hematoma spread, and infection

    Time frame: Throughout the three-month follow-up period, whenever an adverse event occurs

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2029, 36 months later.

Of 153 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Edema, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 168 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 6, 2026
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2029
CompletionEst.
Mar 28, 2030
Last update
Nov 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 12, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 12, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07933718
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
Start date
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 28, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2026

Study contacts

Anne MORICE, DR
Contact
a.morice@chu-tours.fr
0247476680
Anne MORICE, Dr
study director · University Hospital, Tours

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion