ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07930364CARE-COHERENCEUpdated Nov 12, 2026

Wearable HRV Biofeedback for Stress in Dementia Caregivers

An interventional study of Heart rate variability biofeedback in Caregiver Stress, Caregiver Burden and Psychological Stress, sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-12.

Sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Nov 12, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 10 studies in Caregiver Burden with a site in Spain — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Caregiver Burden · Spain.

Started
2026
with 1 other
No phase
8 of 10
3 open now
Registered
10th of 10
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 10
Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla

Among the 10 studies in Caregiver Burden with a site in Spain, this one is one of 2 that started in 2026, is one of 8 with no phase, and was the 10th registered.

Caregiver Burden

501 studies on the registry are indexed under Caregiver Burden; 164 are open to participants now.

Browse Caregiver Burden studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 10 studies in Caregiver Burden with a site in Spain are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 3 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Spain have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Spain →

Who these studies take

Of the 88 Caregiver Burden studies recruiting now, 67 (76%) set no upper age limit and 7 (8%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 38 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 10 studies in Caregiver Burden with a site in Spain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study will evaluate whether a nurse-led heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback programme supported by a low-cost wearable sensor reduces autonomic dysregulation and perceived stress in informal caregivers of people with dementia. Participants will be prospectively allocated, without randomization, at the day-care-centre level. Before enrolment, the six centres will be characterised according to centre size, estimated number of eligible caregivers and expected recruitment volume, and arranged into three approximately matched pairs. One centre in each pair will implement CARE-COHERENCE and the other will serve as a concurrent comparison centre under a pre-specified operational implementation plan. Follow-up will continue for 12 months.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 100 informal caregivers of older people with dementia attending one of six participating day-care centres will be enrolled. The intervention group will receive an 8-week HRV-biofeedback programme in addition to usual caregiver support. The comparison group will receive usual caregiver support during the 12-month study period and will be offered access to programme materials after completion of the final assessment. The primary outcome is change in resting root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) from baseline to 6 months. Perceived stress is the key secondary outcome. Assessments occur at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months.

03

Conditions studied

  • Caregiver Stress
  • Caregiver Burden
  • Psychological Stress

Keywords

  • heart rate variability
  • HRV biofeedback
  • resonance frequency breathing
  • informal caregivers
  • dementia
  • wearable sensor
  • perceived stress
  • nursing intervention
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (18 years or older) self-identified informal, unpaid caregiver of an older person with a clinical diagnosis of dementia attending one of the participating day-care centers.
  • Providing an average of at least 28 hours of unpaid care per week for a minimum of 3 months.
  • Able to understand study procedures and provide written .
  • Able to use a smartphone and a simple wearable device, independently or with brief study support.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent or cardiac arrhythmia preventing reliable interbeat-interval analysis.
  • Pacemaker-dependent rhythm or another condition that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes valid heart rate variability assessment.
  • Current participation in formal heart rate variability biofeedback or structured resonance-frequency breathing training, or equivalent training within the previous 3 months.
  • Severe uncontrolled psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment precluding or meaningful participation.
  • Concurrent enrollment in another structured stress-reduction intervention trial.
  • Note: use of heart rate-modifying medication, including beta-blockers, is not an exclusion criterion. Medication use is documented prospectively and considered in prespecified sensitivity analyses.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CARE-COHERENCE HRV biofeedback program

    Participants receive an 8-week nurse-led heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback program in addition to usual caregiver support. At program entry, an individual resonance frequency is determined using paced-breathing trials across a prespecified range of approximately 4.5 to 6.5 breaths per minute. The active phase comprises four weekly nurse-led sessions of approximately 60 minutes during weeks 1-4, followed by structured supported home practice during weeks 5-8. Sessions cover the physiological rationale for HRV biofeedback, paced breathing at the selected training frequency, interpretation of simple wearable feedback, management of common practice difficulties, and a brief positive-emotion self-regulation strategy. Participants are encouraged to practice approximately 10 minutes twice daily, or to reach a minimum accumulated practice target of 70 minutes per week. One booster contact occurs at month 3.

    Behavioral: Heart rate variability biofeedback

  • No intervention
    Usual caregiver support

    Participants continue to receive usual caregiver support, including routine clinical care, information, and standard services available through the participating day-care centers and other routine health and social care services. They do not receive structured resonance-frequency breathing training or HRV biofeedback from the study team at any point during the 12-month study period. After the 12-month assessment, participants in this group will be offered access to the CARE-COHERENCE educational materials and a program orientation session.

Interventions

  • BehavioralHeart rate variability biofeedback

    Nurse-delivered behavioral self-regulation training combining individualized resonance-frequency paced breathing with real-time HRV feedback from a low-cost wrist- or chest-worn sensor capable of recording interbeat intervals, paired with a compatible training application. Dose: four supervised sessions of approximately 60 minutes in weeks 1-4, delivered individually or in small groups, followed by supported home practice in weeks 5-8 (target 10 minutes twice daily, or at least 70 accumulated minutes per week), plus one booster contact at month 3. Training frequency is set per participant during an initial paced-breathing assessment across approximately 4.5-6.5 breaths per minute. A brief positive-emotion self-regulation strategy is included. The device model, firmware, and application version are prespecified before recruitment and held constant where possible. Adherence is derived from device and application logs and a participant practice log.

    Also known as: CARE-COHERENCE program, Resonance frequency breathing training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in resting RMSSD

    Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) derived from a standardised resting interbeat-interval recording obtained with the study wearable sensor and processed according to a prespecified HRV analysis protocol. Higher values indicate greater vagally mediated heart rate variability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-10)

    Perceived stress measured with the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). Total score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress; a decrease indicates improvement. Analyzed as change from baseline and as the follow-up value adjusted for the baseline score. This is the key secondary outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

  2. Maintenance of resting RMSSD at 12 months

    Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD, in milliseconds) derived from a standardized resting interbeat-interval recording obtained with the study wearable sensor and processed with the prespecified HRV analysis pipeline. Higher values indicate greater vagally mediated heart rate variability. Assesses whether any intervention effect on the primary outcome is maintained six months after the primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  3. Change in caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview, ZBI-22)

    Caregiver burden measured with the 22-item Zarit Burden Interview. Total score ranges from 0 to 88. Higher scores indicate greater burden; a decrease indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

  4. Change in resting SDNN

    Standard deviation of normal-to-normal interbeat intervals (SDNN, in milliseconds) from the same standardized resting recording used for the primary outcome. Higher values indicate greater overall heart rate variability.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

  5. Change in mean resting heart rate

    Mean heart rate in beats per minute derived from the standardized resting interbeat-interval recording.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

  6. Change in well-being (WHO-5 Well-Being Index)

    Well-being measured with the five-item WHO-5 Well-Being Index. The raw score ranges from 0 to 25 and is multiplied by 4 to give a percentage score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better well-being; an increase indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

  7. Change in anxiety and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)

    Symptoms measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression subscales are reported separately; each ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms; a decrease indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sarabia-Cobo CM. Heart coherence: a new tool in the management of stress on professionals and family caregivers of patients with dementia. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015 Jun;40(2):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s10484-015-9276-y. PubMed 25796509 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary publication, together with the data dictionary, may be made available to qualified researchers whose proposed use has been approved by the study team. Data will be shared subject to a data-sharing agreement, applicable ethics committee requirements, and EU General Data Protection Regulation and Spanish data-protection law. Requests should be addressed to the corresponding author.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results report, with no specified end date.

Access criteria: Requests from qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal, reviewed by the study team, and subject to a signed data-sharing agreement and to applicable ethics and EU/Spanish data-protection requirements. Requests should be sent to the corresponding author.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2028, 18 months after the start.

Of 282 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Caregiver Burden, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 18 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 291 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2026
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
StartActual
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2028
Last update
Nov 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 12, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 12, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07930364
Lead sponsor
Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla
Collaborators
University of Cantabria
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2026

Study contacts

Lucia Lavín Alconero
Contact
lucia.lavin@idival.org
+34 942203389
Carmen Sarabia Cobo
principal investigator · University of Cantabria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion