ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07919340Updated Nov 5, 2026

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Longitudinal Subcostal Versus Anterior Approach to Quadratus Lumborum Block for Post-Cesarean Analgesia

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block, Longitudinal Subcostal Approach and Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block, Anterior Approach in Cesarean Section, sponsored by Universitas Indonesia. Completed at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Universitas Indonesia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

**Brief Summary**

This assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial compared the analgesic effectiveness of longitudinal subcostal (QL-LS) and anterior (QL-A) quadratus lumborum blocks following cesarean section. Both approaches provided comparable pain control at rest and during movement. The QL-LS group demonstrated a significantly longer time to first rescue analgesia than the QL-A group (419.5 vs. 295.5 minutes; p \< 0.001), without a significant difference in 24-hour fentanyl consumption. Block performance times and adverse event profiles were similar. The prolonged initial analgesia with QL-LS may be associated with its more cranial injection site and potential differences in local anesthetic spread. These findings suggest that QL-LS prolongs the time to first rescue analgesia but does not demonstrate superiority in pain intensity reduction or overall opioid consumption.

Read the detailed description

Background: Post-cesarean pain is complex because it involves both somatic and visceral components and may interfere with early mobilization and recovery. The quadratus lumborum (QL) block is a fascial plane block that has the potential to provide both somatic and visceral analgesia after cesarean section. The anterior and longitudinal subcostal QL approaches differ in the site of local anesthetic deposition and pattern of spread, with the longitudinal subcostal approach targeting a more cranial fascial plane. Clinical evidence directly comparing the analgesic effectiveness of these two approaches in patients undergoing cesarean section remains limited.

Methods: This assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial included patients undergoing Cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Subjects were allocated into two groups: the QL-LS group, which received a longitudinal subcostal quadratus lumborum block and the QL-A group, which received an anterior quadratus lumborum block. Both blocks were performed bilaterally under ultrasound guidance using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 mg dexamethasone per side. Outcomes included pain intensity, time to first rescue analgesia, fentanyl consumption via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), block performance timea and adverse events.

Results: Pain intensity at rest and during movement did not differ significantly between the QL-LS and QL-A groups at any assessment time point. Time to first rescue analgesia was longer in the QL-LS group than in the QL-A group (419.5 vs 295.5 minutes; p\<0.001), whereas 24-hour fentanyl consumption did not differ significantly. Block performance time per side was descriptively similar between the two approaches. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was the same in both groups, while hypotension, lower-extremity motor weakness, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) were not observed during the monitoring period.

Discussion: The longitudinal subcostal QL block provided a longer duration of initial analgesia than the anterior QL block, possibly because of its more cranial site of local anesthetic deposition and the potential spread toward the lower thoracic segments and paravertebral structures. This longer duration was not accompanied by differences in pain intensity or 24-hour fentanyl consumption.

Conclusion: The longitudinal subcostal QL block was not superior to the anterior approach in reducing pain intensity or 24-hour fentanyl requirement, but it provided a longer duration of initial analgesia.

Keywords: quadratus lumborum block, longitudinal subcostal approach, anterior approach, cesarean section, postoperative pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Section

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • quadratus lumborum block
  • longitudinal subcostal approach
  • anterior approach
  • cesarean section
  • postoperative pain
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitas Indonesia is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18-45 years.
  • (ASA) physical status II-III.
  • Undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
  • Undergoing cesarean section through a Pfannenstiel incision.
  • (BMI) of 18.5-35 kg/m².

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergy to bupivacaine.
  • Cognitive impairment.
  • History of neurological disorders affecting the lower extremities.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Infection at the injection site.
  • History of chronic pain or long-term opioid use.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension.

Withdrawal Criteria

  • Development of a systemic allergic reaction or anaphylaxis.
  • Intraoperative complications requiring conversion to general anesthesia.
  • Voluntary withdrawal from the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Quadratus Lumborum Block Anterior Approach

    Ultrasound-guided bilateral quadratus lumborum block using the anterior approach, with bupivacain 0,25% + dexamethasone 5 mg total volume 20 mL per side, performed after cesarean section for postoperative analgesia.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block, Anterior Approach · Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% + Dexamethasone 5 mg

  • Experimental
    Quadratus Lumborum Block Longitudinal Subcostal Approach

    Ultrasound-guided bilateral quadratus lumborum block using the longitudinal subcostal approach, with bupivacain 0,25% + dexamethasone 5 mg total volume 20 mL per side, performed after cesarean section for postoperative analgesia.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block, Longitudinal Subcostal Approach · Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% + Dexamethasone 5 mg

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block, Longitudinal Subcostal Approach

    Patient in lateral decubitus position. Curvilinear transducer placed in parasagittal orientation in the posterior subcostal region, 6-8 cm lateral to the spinous process, at the QL insertion on the 12th rib. 21G 100 mm needle inserted in-plane caudal to cranial, through latissimus dorsi and QL, to the plane between QL and the anterior thoracolumbar fascia. Performed bilaterally after cesarean section

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block, Anterior Approach

    Patient in lateral decubitus position. Curvilinear transducer placed in transverse orientation at the lumbar triangle (Petit's triangle), moved posteromedially to obtain the shamrock sign at L4. 21G 100 mm needle inserted in-plane posterior to anterior, through QL, to the interfascial plane between QL and psoas major. Performed bilaterally after cesarean section

  • DrugBupivacaine 0.25% + Dexamethasone 5 mg

    Bupivacaine 0.25% with dexamethasone 5 mg, total volume 20 mL per side, injected in fractionated doses with intermittent aspiration every 3-5 mL. Same drug, dose and volume in both arms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-operative Pain Intensity

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), scored from 0-10, at 6, 12 and 24 hours after the block

    Time frame: From the completion of the block to the 24 hours post-block

  2. Time to first rescue analgesia

    Time from the completion of the block to the administration of the first additional analgesia, measured in minutes.

    Time frame: From the completion of the block to the 24 hours post-block

  3. Total additional fentanyl consumption

    Total fentanyl consumpion measured in microgram, recorded from the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device

    Time frame: From the completion of the block to the 24 hours post-block

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universitas Indonesia
    Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thabet GSM, Aboelenin TMM, Abdelmaboud MA. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative pain after caesarean delivery. Med J Cairo Univ. 2022;90(1):91-97.
  • Long X, Yin Y, Guo W, Tang L. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: a powerful way for reducing postoperative pain. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 1;85(10):4947-4953. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001209. eCollection 2023 Oct. PubMed 37811106 ↗
  • El-Tallawy SN, Pergolizzi JV, Amlih HF, Fairaq MM, Awaleh FI, Alsubaie AT, Shaheen IS, Al-Kayyal YS, Ahmed RS, Ali WA. Enhancing Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Section: Insights Into Transversus Abdominis Plane Block, Intrathecal Opioids, and Other Analgesic Techniques. Cureus. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):e72773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72773. eCollection 2024 Oct. PubMed 39618576 ↗
  • Silverman M, Zwolinski N, Wang E, Lockwood N, Ancuta M, Jin E, Li J. Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients. J Pain Res. 2023 Nov 10;16:3807-3835. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S428332. eCollection 2023. PubMed 38026463 ↗
  • Yang TR, He XM, Li XH, Wang RR. Intrathecal morphine versus transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 22;21(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01392-9. PubMed 34157985 ↗
  • Jing Y, Zhao S, Guo W, Qin L, Li Y, You D. Comparison of analgesic modalities after cesarean section: a network meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3599-3612. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002352. PubMed 40146253 ↗
  • Lewald H, Girard T. Analgesia after cesarean section - what is new? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;36(3):288-292. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001259. Epub 2023 Mar 1. PubMed 36994740 ↗
  • Demilew BC, Zurbachew N, Getachew N, Mekete G, Lema DT. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Postoperative Acute Pain for Mothers Who Gave Birth With Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Dec;25(6):e452-e464. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 Jul 20. PubMed 39033057 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07919340
Lead sponsor
Universitas Indonesia
Responsible party
Raden Besthadi Sukmono (MD, Universitas Indonesia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Aug 28, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026
Completion
Oct 27, 2026
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion