ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07535788tDCS implementUpdated Oct 26, 2026

Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting

An observational study in Aphasia and Stroke, sponsored by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Updated Oct 26, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in United States+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study looks at whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can be effectively implemented in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings during routine speech therapy for people who recently had a stroke and now have aphasia (difficulty speaking or understanding language)

Read the detailed description

Aphasia affects many stroke survivors and can impact communication, independence, and quality of life. Speech therapy helps, but recovery can be slow. Earlier research in people with long-term aphasia shows that adding gentle brain stimulation (tDCS) can improve both speech and comprehension when paired with language therapy. This study will explore how well tDCS can be integrated into everyday care for patients who are still early in their recovery.

Before starting the study, identified Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) will be trained for the use of tDCS (BrainDriver v2.1 device, that has already been approved by Casa Colina Infection Control). The following workflow will be used for tDCS implementation with the SLP team: 1) Upon speech assessment, the SLP team will determine if an adult stroke patient meets criteria for aphasia, 2) Within 3 days, communication order will be obtained from physician for tDCS, 3) The tDCS equipment will be reserved for each session, 4) Equipment to be maintained in a locked cabinet, 4) tDCS equipment will be cleaned after each use, 5) patient label will be affixed on plastic bag holding sponges and placed in folder located in a locked cabinet, 6) tDCS treatment document will be filled on daily notes.

Patients will receive a 20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions). Since this is a feasibility study where the goal is to identify usability issues, workflow integration, and initial reactions. We will involve 5 SLP staff members who will use the device in around 30patients (6 patients/therapist).

This prospective implementation study will use a RE-AIM framework which has been previously used to implement medical devices in clinical settings. This framework includes 5 domains of assessment:

  • REACH: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are selected to participate in this study (eg, comparing participants to non-participants). These information will be collected in the hospital database.
  • EFFECTIVENESS/EFFICACY: The impact of an intervention on important individual outcomes, including potential negative effects; and variability across subgroups (generalizability or heterogeneity of effects). Effectiveness will be assessed using the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr) and the Adverse Event Questionnaire (AEQ). The WABr is a part of the clinical routine and data will be extracted from the hospital database. The AEQ will be added in a log.
  • IMPLEMENTATION: At the setting level, implementation refers to the intervention agents' fidelity to the various elements of an intervention's key functions or components, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time and cost of the intervention. Importantly, it also includes adaptations made to interventions and implementation strategies. Consistency of implementation will be collected using a log. Barriers and facilitators will also be identified based on a tailored Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire. Cost of intervention in terms of time and money will be assessed using the Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) and Cost Effective Analysis (CEA), respectively.
  • ADOPTION: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of intervention agents (staff who deliver the program) who are willing to initiate a program, and why. Data will be extracted post-study based on who participated.
  • MAINTENANCE: At the setting level, the extent to which a program or policy becomes institutionalized or part of the routine organizational practices and policies. This aspect will be assessed with the implementation in 2 settings (inpatient and outpatient) with follow-up interviews at 6 months.

The staff will be interviewed using the NTI and a tailored TDF questionnaire (30 minutes). All the data related to adverse events (AEQ) and consistency of delivery will be collected in a log that the therapist will use during each session. All other information will be extracted from the hospital database. All the data will be collected at 3 timepoints (every 3 patients; 3patients/therapist). An additional timepoint at baseline will be added only for the TDF questionnaire. Descriptive analyses (proportion, frequency, percentage) will be used to analyze the results to our survey. Qualitative analyses will also be used for addressing the open-ended questions of our survey.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aphasia
  • Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Aphasia

338 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphasia; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 77 across 36 observational studies indexed under Aphasia.

Browse Aphasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

adult stroke patients with aphasia of inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • aphasia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not a patient at either inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Devicetranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nasa Taskload Index (NTI)

    The NASA Task Load Index (NTI) is a widely used tool for measuring how demanding a task feels to a person. It captures subjective workload, meaning it asks individuals to rate how challenging a task was for them. It was developed by NASA researchers in the 1980s to better understand how mental and physical demands affect performance

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)

  2. Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire

    The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a structured approach used to understand why people do or do not change behavior in healthcare and other settings. It brings together key concepts from multiple behavior-change theories into a single framework to help identify barriers and facilitators to implementing new practices.

    Time frame: at baseline, as well as 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr)

    The Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) is a standardized assessment used to identify the presence, type, and severity of aphasia in adults with acquired brain injury, most commonly stroke. It evaluates multiple language skills, including speech production, comprehension, repetition, and naming, as well as reading and writing.

    Time frame: at patient's admission and discharge (around 3 weeks after admission)

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse Event Questionnaire (AEQ)

    The Adverse Event Questionnaire (AEQ) is a safety monitoring tool used to systematically record any unwanted or unexpected symptoms that occur during or after an intervention. It typically asks participants or clinicians to report the type, severity, timing, and duration of potential side effects. In this study, the AEQ is used to report known, low-risk side effects of tDCS, such as scalp tingling, skin irritation, headache, or fatigue.

    Time frame: 3 months and 6 months (after the start of data collection, approximately)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Williams EER, Sghirripa S, Rogasch NC, Hordacre B, Attrill S. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(17):3802-3826. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299. Epub 2023 Oct 13. PubMed 37828899 ↗
  • Picano C, Quadrini A, Pisano F, Marangolo P. Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety. Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 2;11(1):41. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010041. PubMed 33401678 ↗
  • Breining BL, Sebastian R. Neuromodulation in post-stroke aphasia treatment. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020 Jun;8(2):44-56. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00257-5. Epub 2020 Feb 22. PubMed 33344066 ↗
  • Khan A, Yuan K, Bao SC, Ti CHE, Tariq A, Anjum N, Tong RK. Can Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Facilitate Post-stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 10;3:795737. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.795737. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36188889 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be collected as part of routine clinical care and implementation activities, and participants will not provide consent for public data sharing. Data access is therefore restricted to protect participant privacy and confidentiality, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical guidelines.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 26, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in United States
Show site
  • Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare · Pomona, United States
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in United States
    Show site
    • Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare · Pomona, United States
    + 1 other change: date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07535788
Lead sponsor
Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Responsible party
Caroline Schnakers (Associate Director of Research, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 17, 2026
Start date
May 4, 2026
Primary completion
May 4, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Caroline Schnakers, PhD
Contact
cschnakers@casacolina.org
3108061443 ext. 3038

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion