ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07914049Updated Nov 3, 2026

Personalized Disease Modeling for Rare Genetic Myopathies

An observational study in Congenital Myopathies and Muscular Dystrophy, sponsored by Akron Children's Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Akron Children's Hospital · Observational

Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3
Ages
Up to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn how rare genetic muscle diseases change over time and whether muscle cells grown from a participant's blood can help researchers understand the disease. The study will include children and young adults under age 21 with a genetic muscle disease and a rare genetic change that may be suitable for a future personalized treatment.

The main questions are:

How do each participant's muscle strength, movement, and health change over time? Can muscle cells grown from a participant's blood show how their genetic change affects muscle? For some participants, can a potential treatment improve those cells in the laboratory?

Participants will be followed for approximately 2 years. Researchers will review their health, measure muscle function, and ask participants and caregivers about quality of life. Assessments may also include blood tests, muscle ultrasound, muscle MRI without sedation, optional nerve and muscle electrical measurements, and ankle-worn movement sensors for participants who walk.

Researchers will use a blood sample to grow muscle cells in the laboratory to better understand how a muscle condition develops and what potential treatments might work.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this observational study is to learn how rare genetic muscle diseases change over time and whether muscle cells grown from a participant's blood can help researchers understand the disease. The study will include children and young adults under age 21 with a genetic muscle disease and a rare genetic change that may be suitable for a future personalized treatment.

The main questions are:

How do each participant's muscle strength, movement, and health change over time? Can muscle cells grown from a participant's blood show how their genetic change affects muscle? For some participants, can a potential treatment improve those cells in the laboratory?

Participants will be followed for at least 2 years and up to 4 years. They will have full clinic visits about every 6 months and shorter assessments about every 3 months. Researchers will review their health, measure muscle function, and ask participants and caregivers about quality of life. Assessments may also include blood tests, muscle ultrasound, muscle MRI without sedation, optional nerve and muscle electrical measurements, and ankle-worn movement sensors for participants who walk.

Researchers will use a blood sample to grow muscle cells in the laboratory. For some participants, they will test experimental antisense oligonucleotides, which are molecules designed to change how a gene's instructions are used, in those cells only. No participant will receive an experimental treatment in this study. A future treatment study would require separate enrollment and consent.

02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Myopathies
  • Muscular Dystrophy

Keywords

  • antisense oligonucleotide
  • myopathy
  • congenital myopathy
  • personalized therapy
  • n-of-1
  • ultra-rare
  • nano-rare
  • muscular dystrophy
  • disease modeling
  • natural history
03

In context

Myotonia Congenita

29 studies on the registry are indexed under Myotonia Congenita; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3 is below the median of 44 across 16 observational studies indexed under Myotonia Congenita.

Browse Myotonia Congenita studies →

Lead sponsor

Akron Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with genetic myopathies and ultra-rare mutations potentially amenable to personalized antisense oligonucleotide therapy

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Patient age at time of consent is \<21 years.

      • Clinically confirmed genetic muscle disease* with either:

        • a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a disease-causing gene11, or
        • a variant of uncertain significance that is considered by the investigators to be potentially causative of the patient's neuromuscular phenotype**.
      • The identified variant is theoretically amenable to at least one of the following RNA-targeted therapeutic strategies12 described below and based on published guidelines ***:

        • ASO-mediated splice modulation through forced exon inclusion or pseudoexon exclusion
        • ASO-mediated allele-specific knockdown
      • Variant population frequency ≤1:100,000 based on reference databases (e.g., gnomAD).
      • The clinical phenotype is sufficiently severe and/or progressive to warrant consideration of future therapeutic approaches, as determined by consensus of the trial team, taking into account factors such as:

        • Ambulatory status
        • Respiratory involvement
        • Dysphagia
        • Functional independence
        • Expected disease progression
        • Frequency of hospitalization and/or ICU admission
      • Disease course is not expected to progress to death or end-stage pathology within a timeframe that would preclude meaningful longitudinal observation or potential future interventional study planning (anticipated ≥4 years).
      • For patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, dosing (adjusted for weight) is stable for the preceding 3 months prior to start date.
      • Willingness to participate in all study-related observational assessments and to adhere to standard-of-care clinical management.
      • Parent or caregiver is fluent in English to ensure valid administration of standardized outcome measures and procedures.

        • Genetic muscle disease is defined as a genetically determined condition in which the primary phenotype arises from skeletal muscle pathology. Disorders may have extra-muscular manifestations (e.g., neurocognitive features in Duchenne muscular dystrophy), but skeletal muscle dysfunction must be the primary driver of impairment. Eligible diagnoses include congenital muscular dystrophies, congenital myopathies, dystrophinopathies, limb-girdle muscular dystrophies, and skeletal muscle channelopathies. Confirmation of the variant of interest must be obtained through DNA sequencing performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory.

          • For subjects with variants of uncertain significance by standard American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria, orthogonal pathogenicity data will be required. This is expected in cases of deep intronic variants, where clinical genetic reports may not account for RNA sequencing data obtained from external labs.

            • ASO-amenable variants will be defined based on the variant type and mechanism of disease. For subjects with deep intronic pathogenic variants, evidence of a pseudoexon or abnormal exclusion of an exon by RNA sequencing data will be required for study participation. For subjects with dominant, gain of function variants, evidence from literature for toxic gain of function as a mechanism of disease will be required and evidence from literature that haploinsufficiency is not a disease mechanism will also be required.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Availability of an effective (expected to halt all disease progression) disease-modifying therapy for the patient's condition at the time of enrollment.

      • Pathogenic or suspected causative variant with population frequency >1:100,000 based on standard reference databases.
      • Variants with mechanisms not compatible with the therapeutic strategies under evaluation, including:

        • Splice-site variants within 10 bp of canonical donor or acceptor sites
        • Dominant variants acting through haploinsufficiency
        • Recessively acting missense variants
        • Whole-gene deletions
        • Mitochondrially encoded variants
      • Current enrollment in, or planned enrollment in, another interventional clinical trial.
      • Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the anticipated study period.
      • Inability of the subject or family to comply with study procedures.
      • Chronic thrombocytopenia ( count \<75,000/uL that is not transient) or coagulation disorders ( (INR)>1.3, activated partial thromboplastin time >40 seconds, or symptomatic von Willebrand disease)
      • Comorbid conditions that would interfere with the performance or interpretation of key outcome measures, including but not limited to:

        • Severe intellectual disability
        • Severe systemic non-neuromuscular disease (e.g., advanced liver disease) or central nervous system injury (e.g., anoxic brain injury)
        • Active undergoing treatment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Rare Myopathy

    Participants with rare genetic myopathies potentially amenable to personalized antisense oligonucleotide therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score

    Sum of bilateral Medical Research Council grades for arm abduction, arm flexion, arm extension, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Scoring values are 0 (Minimum) to 60 (Maximum), with a higher score representing better outcomes.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  2. North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA)

    The North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) is a 17-item rating scale that is used to measure functional motor abilities in ambulant children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). It is usually used to monitor the progression of the disease and treatment effects. The activities in the 17-itm scale are graded as follows: 2 - "Normal" - no obvious modification of activity 1 - Modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another 0 - Unable to achieve independently This scale is ordinal with 34 as the maximum score indicating fully-independent function. The higher the score, the better outcome.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. 10 Meter Walk/Run

    Best time on 10-meter walk or run

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  2. Supine to stand velocity

    Fastest time from lying to standing

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  3. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL 4.0 GCS)

    Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales and Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) Module : Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) used to assess health-related quality of life in children with DMD. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core contains 23 items assessing physical, emotional, social, and school functioning, while the DMD Module includes disease-specific items addressing daily activities, treatment barriers, worry, and communication. Child self-report and parent proxy versions use a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never a problem to 4 = almost always a problem; ages 5-7 use a simplified 3-point scale). Responses are reverse-scored and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Scores are calculated for individual domains and total summary measures.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  4. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) and Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C): Single-item assessments completed by the patient that measure overall change in the participant's condition since the start of treatment. Scores range from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved, 4 = no change, and 7 = very much worse. Lower scores indicate improvement, higher scores indicate worsening, and mid-range scores indicate little or no change.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  5. Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)

    Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C): Single-item assessments completed by the clinician (CGI-C) that measure overall change in the participant's condition since the start of treatment. Scores range from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved, 4 = no change, and 7 = very much worse. Lower scores indicate improvement, higher scores indicate worsening, and mid-range scores indicate little or no change.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  6. SV95C

    95%ile stride velocity based on wearable biosensor

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  7. Grip strength

    Dynamometry for grip strength, measured in kilograms taken as the best of 3 trials on the best side

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  8. Muscle Fat fraction

    Muscle Fat Fraction: Quantitative MRI assessment of muscle composition performed using an 8-point Dixon MRI sequence of the right thigh on a 3 Tesla (3T) MRI scanner. Muscle fat fraction is reported as the percentage of fat-containing voxels within the muscle, with higher percentages indicating greater fatty infiltration of muscle tissue.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  9. Muscle thickness by ultrasound

    Standardized muscle thickness at standard positions on the left side measured by ultrasound and summed (biceps, vastus lateralis, and tibialis anterior)

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  10. Muscle ultrasound grayscale intensity

    Mean ultrasound grayscale intensity at selected muscles measured in pixel brightness within a manual region of interest

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  11. Muscle ultrasound grayscale variability

    Standard deviation of pixel grayscale intensity within a manually selected region of interest at selected muscles.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  12. FVC

    Forced vital capacity as percent predicted

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  13. 4SC

    Timed 4 stair climb velocity

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  14. Electrophysiology - Compound Motor Action Potential (CMAP)

    Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) at standard sites: A noninvasive electrophysiologic measure of the muscle's electrical response following nerve stimulation. CMAP amplitude and area are used to assess the integrity of motor nerve pathways and overall muscle activation. Reported as amplitude (millivolts \[mV\]) and, when assessed, area (millivolt-milliseconds \[mV·ms\]). Higher values generally indicate better neuromuscular function; there is no fixed range for this assessment (no minimum or maximum).

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  15. Electrophysiology - Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX)

    Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX) at standard sites: A noninvasive electrophysiologic measure that estimates the number of functioning motor units within a muscle using nerve conduction and surface electromyography data. Calculated from CMAP and surface electromyography (EMG) recordings and reported as a unitless index score. Higher values generally indicate greater preservation of motor units; there is no fixed range for this assessment (no minimum or maximum).

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

  16. Electrophysiology - Motor Unit Size Index (MUSIX)

    Motor Unit Size Index (MUSIX): An electrophysiologic measure derived from CMAP and MUNIX results that estimates the average size of functioning motor units. Changes in MUSIX may reflect compensatory enlargement of remaining motor units associated with neuromuscular disease progression. Derived from CMAP and MUNIX measurements and reported as a unitless index score representing estimated average motor unit size. There is no minimum or maximum value.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Almarwani M, Perera S, VanSwearingen JM, Sparto PJ, Brach JS. The test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of spatial and temporal gait variability during usual over-ground walking for younger and older adults. Gait Posture. 2016 Feb;44:94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Nov 30. PubMed 27004639 ↗
  • Chiba S, Okuno Y. In Silico Prediction and Selection of Exon-Skipping Antisense Oligonucleotide Sequences Using eSkip-Finder. Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2964:109-116. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4730-1_6. PubMed 40720013 ↗
  • Zhu A, Chiba S, Shimizu Y, Kunitake K, Okuno Y, Aoki Y, Yokota T. Ensemble-Learning and Feature Selection Techniques for Enhanced Antisense Oligonucleotide Efficacy Prediction in Exon Skipping. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jun 24;15(7):1808. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071808. PubMed 37513994 ↗
  • Chiba S, Lim KRQ, Sheri N, Anwar S, Erkut E, Shah MNA, Aslesh T, Woo S, Sheikh O, Maruyama R, Takano H, Kunitake K, Duddy W, Okuno Y, Aoki Y, Yokota T. eSkip-Finder: a machine learning-based web application and database to identify the optimal sequences of antisense oligonucleotides for exon skipping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 2;49(W1):W193-W198. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab442. PubMed 34104972 ↗
  • Kang S, Lee D, Hwang G, Lee K, Kang M. ASOptimizer: optimizing chemical diversity of antisense oligonucleotides through deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Jul 7;53(W1):W39-W44. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf392. PubMed 40377084 ↗
  • Kimi J, Korczak P, Vialet B, Roubin E, Barthelemy P, Campagne S, Malard F. ASOG: AntiSense Oligonucleotide Generator. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025 Sep 16;27:4145-4150. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.022. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41050468 ↗
  • Pinton L, Khedr M, Lionello VM, Sarcar S, Maffioletti SM, Dastidar S, Negroni E, Choi S, Khokhar N, Bigot A, Counsell JR, Bernardo AS, Zammit PS, Tedesco FS. 3D human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived bioengineered skeletal muscles for tissue, disease and therapy modeling. Nat Protoc. 2023 Apr;18(4):1337-1376. doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00790-8. Epub 2023 Feb 15. PubMed 36792780 ↗
  • Maffioletti SM, Sarcar S, Henderson ABH, Mannhardt I, Pinton L, Moyle LA, Steele-Stallard H, Cappellari O, Wells KE, Ferrari G, Mitchell JS, Tyzack GE, Kotiadis VN, Khedr M, Ragazzi M, Wang W, Duchen MR, Patani R, Zammit PS, Wells DJ, Eschenhagen T, Tedesco FS. Three-Dimensional Human iPSC-Derived Artificial Skeletal Muscles Model Muscular Dystrophies and Enable Multilineage Tissue Engineering. Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 17;23(3):899-908. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.091. PubMed 29669293 ↗
  • Chal J, Al Tanoury Z, Hestin M, Gobert B, Aivio S, Hick A, Cherrier T, Nesmith AP, Parker KK, Pourquie O. Generation of human muscle fibers and satellite-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2016 Oct;11(10):1833-50. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.110. Epub 2016 Sep 1. PubMed 27583644 ↗
  • Barnard AM, Willcocks RJ, Finanger EL, Daniels MJ, Triplett WT, Rooney WD, Lott DJ, Forbes SC, Wang DJ, Senesac CR, Harrington AT, Finkel RS, Russman BS, Byrne BJ, Tennekoon GI, Walter GA, Sweeney HL, Vandenborne K. Skeletal muscle magnetic resonance biomarkers correlate with function and sentinel events in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 19;13(3):e0194283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194283. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29554116 ↗
  • Vandenborne K, Walter GA, Straub V, Willcocks RJ, Forbes SC, Mercuri EM, Muntoni F, Ding K, Ennamuri S, Reid C, Murphy AP, Manfrini M, Mendell JR, Elkins JS, Rodino-Klapac LR. Quantitative Muscle Magnetic Resonance Outcomes in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: An Exploratory Analysis From the EMBARK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2025 Jul 1;82(7):734-744. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0992. PubMed 40354061 ↗
  • Willcocks RJ, Rooney WD, Triplett WT, Forbes SC, Lott DJ, Senesac CR, Daniels MJ, Wang DJ, Harrington AT, Tennekoon GI, Russman BS, Finanger EL, Byrne BJ, Finkel RS, Walter GA, Sweeney HL, Vandenborne K. Multicenter prospective longitudinal study of magnetic resonance biomarkers in a large duchenne muscular dystrophy cohort. Ann Neurol. 2016 Apr;79(4):535-47. doi: 10.1002/ana.24599. Epub 2016 Feb 19. PubMed 26891991 ↗
  • Dahlqvist JR, Widholm P, Leinhard OD, Vissing J. MRI in Neuromuscular Diseases: An Emerging Diagnostic Tool and Biomarker for Prognosis and Efficacy. Ann Neurol. 2020 Oct;88(4):669-681. doi: 10.1002/ana.25804. Epub 2020 Jul 1. PubMed 32495452 ↗
  • Triplett WT, Baligand C, Forbes SC, Willcocks RJ, Lott DJ, DeVos S, Pollaro J, Rooney WD, Sweeney HL, Bonnemann CG, Wang DJ, Vandenborne K, Walter GA. Chemical shift-based MRI to measure fat fractions in dystrophic skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jul;72(1):8-19. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24917. Epub 2013 Sep 4. PubMed 24006208 ↗
  • Ayyar Gupta V, Pitchforth JM, Domingos J, Ridout D, Iodice M, Rye C, Chesshyre M, Wolfe A, Selby V, Mayhew A, Mazzone ES, Ricotti V, Hogrel JY, Niks EH, de Groot I, Servais L, Straub V, Mercuri E, Manzur AY, Muntoni F; iMDEX Consortium and the U.K. NorthStar Clinical Network. Determining minimal clinically important differences in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0283669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283669. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37099511 ↗
  • Mayhew AG, Coratti G, Mazzone ES, Klingels K, James M, Pane M, Straub V, Goemans N, Mercuri E; Pul Working Group. Performance of Upper Limb module for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 May;62(5):633-639. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14361. Epub 2019 Sep 19. PubMed 31538331 ↗
  • den Dunnen JT, Dalgleish R, Maglott DR, Hart RK, Greenblatt MS, McGowan-Jordan J, Roux AF, Smith T, Antonarakis SE, Taschner PE. HGVS Recommendations for the Description of Sequence Variants: 2016 Update. Hum Mutat. 2016 Jun;37(6):564-9. doi: 10.1002/humu.22981. Epub 2016 Mar 25. PubMed 26931183 ↗
  • Powell PA, Carlton J, Woods HB, Mazzone P. Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Aug 3;18(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z. PubMed 32746836 ↗
  • Uzark K, King E, Cripe L, Spicer R, Sage J, Kinnett K, Wong B, Pratt J, Varni JW. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pediatrics. 2012 Dec;130(6):e1559-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0858. Epub 2012 Nov 5. PubMed 23129083 ↗
  • Cheerie D, Meserve MM, Beijer D, Kaiwar C, Newton L, Taylor Tavares AL, Verran AS, Sherrill E, Leonard S, Sanders SJ, Blake E, Elkhateeb N, Gandhi A, Liang NSY, Morgan JT, Verwillow A, Verheijen J, Giles A, Williams S, Chopra M, Croft L, Dafsari HS, Davidson AE, Friedman J, Gregor A, Haque B, Lechner R, Montgomery KA, Ryten M, Schober E, Siegel G, Sullivan PJ, Whittle EF, Zardetto B, Yu TW, Synofzik M, Aartsma-Rus A, Costain G, Lauffer MC; N=1 Collaborative. Consensus guidelines for assessing eligibility of pathogenic DNA variants for antisense oligonucleotide treatments. Am J Hum Genet. 2025 May 1;112(5):975-983. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.02.017. Epub 2025 Mar 25. PubMed 40139194 ↗
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5. PubMed 25741868 ↗
  • Prasad V, Makary MA. FDA's New Plausible Mechanism Pathway. N Engl J Med. 2025 Dec 11;393(23):2365-2367. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2512695. Epub 2025 Nov 12. No abstract available. PubMed 41223362 ↗
  • Wilton-Clark H, Yan E, Yokota T. Preparing for Patient-Customized N-of-1 Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapy to Treat Rare Diseases. Genes (Basel). 2024 Jun 21;15(7):821. doi: 10.3390/genes15070821. PubMed 39062600 ↗
  • Kim-McManus O, Gleeson JG, Mignon L, Smith Fine A, Yan W, Nolen N, Demarest S, Berry-Kravis E, Finkel R, Leonard S, Finlayson S, Augustine E, Lyon GJ, Schule R, Yu T. A framework for N-of-1 trials of individualized gene-targeted therapies for genetic diseases. Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 12;15(1):9802. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54077-5. PubMed 39532857 ↗
  • Kim J, Woo S, de Gusmao CM, Zhao B, Chin DH, DiDonato RL, Nguyen MA, Nakayama T, Hu CA, Soucy A, Kuniholm A, Thornton JK, Riccardi O, Friedman DA, El Achkar CM, Dash Z, Cornelissen L, Donado C, Faour KNW, Bush LW, Suslovitch V, Lentucci C, Park PJ, Lee EA, Patterson A, Philippakis AA, Margus B, Berde CB, Yu TW. A framework for individualized splice-switching oligonucleotide therapy. Nature. 2023 Jul;619(7971):828-836. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06277-0. Epub 2023 Jul 12. PubMed 37438524 ↗
  • Kim J, Hu C, Moufawad El Achkar C, Black LE, Douville J, Larson A, Pendergast MK, Goldkind SF, Lee EA, Kuniholm A, Soucy A, Vaze J, Belur NR, Fredriksen K, Stojkovska I, Tsytsykova A, Armant M, DiDonato RL, Choi J, Cornelissen L, Pereira LM, Augustine EF, Genetti CA, Dies K, Barton B, Williams L, Goodlett BD, Riley BL, Pasternak A, Berry ER, Pflock KA, Chu S, Reed C, Tyndall K, Agrawal PB, Beggs AH, Grant PE, Urion DK, Snyder RO, Waisbren SE, Poduri A, Park PJ, Patterson A, Biffi A, Mazzulli JR, Bodamer O, Berde CB, Yu TW. Patient-Customized Oligonucleotide Therapy for a Rare Genetic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1644-1652. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813279. Epub 2019 Oct 9. PubMed 31597037 ↗
  • Wagner M, Berecki G, Fazeli W, Nussbaum C, Flemmer AW, Frizzo S, Heer F, Heinen F, Horton R, Jacotin H, Motel W, Spar B, Klein C, Siegel C, Hubener C, Stocklein S, Paolini M, Staudt M, Tacke M, Wolff M, Petrou S, Souza M, Borggraefe I. Antisense oligonucleotide treatment in a preterm infant with early-onset SCN2A developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Nat Med. 2025 Jul;31(7):2174-2178. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03656-0. Epub 2025 Apr 22. PubMed 40263630 ↗
  • Ziegler A, Carroll J, Bain JM, Sands TT, Fee RJ, Uher D, Kanner CH, Montes J, Glass S, Douville J, Mignon L, Gleeson JG, Crooke ST, Chung WK. Antisense oligonucleotide therapy in an individual with KIF1A-associated neurological disorder. Nat Med. 2024 Oct;30(10):2782-2786. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03197-y. Epub 2024 Aug 9. PubMed 39122967 ↗
  • Mah JK, Korngut L, Dykeman J, Day L, Pringsheim T, Jette N. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the epidemiology of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Jun;24(6):482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Mar 22. PubMed 24780148 ↗
  • Theadom A, Rodrigues M, Poke G, O'Grady G, Love D, Hammond-Tooke G, Parmar P, Baker R, Feigin V, Jones K, Te Ao B, Ranta A, Roxburgh R; On Behalf of the MDPrev Research Group. A Nationwide, Population-Based Prevalence Study of Genetic Muscle Disorders. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;52(3-4):128-135. doi: 10.1159/000494115. Epub 2019 Jan 18. PubMed 30661069 ↗
  • Pagola-Lorz I, Vicente E, Ibanez B, Torne L, Elizalde-Beiras I, Garcia-Solaesa V, Garcia F, Delfrade J, Jerico I. Epidemiological study and genetic characterization of inherited muscle diseases in a northern Spanish region. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Dec 2;14(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1227-x. PubMed 31791368 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual patient, anonymous biosensor data and basic clinical information will be shared with partner organization as specified by our IRB approved protocol. Additional IPD may be shared on a case-by-case basis with additional consent and IRB approval due to the small sample size, presence of genomic information, and to respect subject confidentiality.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Supporting information such as protocol/methodology or code will be made available for up to 5 years after completion of the study.

Access criteria: Supporting information will be provided upon written request to the principal investigator.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 27 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 14, 2026
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
StartActual
Sep 22, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07914049
Lead sponsor
Akron Children's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Sep 22, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Matthew Ginsberg, MD, MBA
principal investigator · Akron Children's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion