ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07907666Updated Oct 30, 2026

Ropivacaine Alone Versus Ropivacaine Plus Lidocaine With or Without Epinephrine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of ropivacaine and lidocaine in Postoperative Pain, Upper Extremity Fracture and Anesthesia, Conduction, sponsored by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 59 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Sponsored by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial compared three local anesthetic solutions for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults aged 18 to 59 years undergoing upper limb orthopedic and trauma surgery at a general hospital of the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) in Aguascalientes, Mexico. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% alone, ropivacaine 0.375% plus lidocaine 1%, or ropivacaine 0.375% plus lidocaine 1% with epinephrine. The main question was whether adding lidocaine, with or without epinephrine, to ropivacaine improves postoperative analgesia. Pain intensity (0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale) at 6 hours after surgery was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were pain at 0 and 12 hours, need for rescue analgesia, analgesic and opioid consumption, motor block (modified Bromage scale) and adverse events during the first 12 postoperative hours. Block onset time was also recorded.

Read the detailed description

Background. Mixing a fast-onset local anesthetic with a long-acting agent is common practice in peripheral nerve blocks to shorten block onset, but its effect on the quality and duration of analgesia is controversial, and no study had evaluated these mixtures in patients of the Mexican Social Security Institute.

Design. Single-center, superiority, randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups (1:1:1 allocation) and blinded outcome assessment, conducted at Hospital General de Zona No. 3, IMSS, Aguascalientes, Mexico, from January 2 to April 16, 2026. The trial was approved by the local research and ethics committees (registration R-2026-101-005) and all participants gave written informed consent. This trial was registered retrospectively, after completion of enrollment.

Interventions. All participants received an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with a total volume of 30 mL: group C, 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 15 mL of sterile water (ropivacaine 0.375%); group L, 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 15 mL of lidocaine 2% (ropivacaine 0.375% plus lidocaine 1%); group E, 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 15 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine (ropivacaine 0.375% plus lidocaine 1%, final epinephrine concentration 2.5 micrograms/mL, 1:400,000). No perineural adjuvants were used. Blocks were performed by attending anesthesiologists and anesthesiology residents assigned to each operating room according to the department's daily roster. All participants received the institution's standard intraoperative sedation and analgesia (a corticosteroid, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, acetaminophen, midazolam and fentanyl), except when a drug was contraindicated.

Randomization and blinding. The principal investigator generated the allocation sequence in Excel for folios 1 to 138. Allocation was concealed in sealed envelopes identified by folio number, kept by the thesis investigator together with the study syringes and opened immediately before the block. Outcomes were assessed by the attending anesthesiologists and residents in charge of each participant, who were unaware of group allocation.

Outcomes. Pain intensity was measured with the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale and motor block with the modified Bromage scale for the upper limb (0 = full movement, 3 = complete motor block) at 0, 6 and 12 hours after the end of surgery; rescue analgesics, opioid use and adverse events were recorded at the same time points. Block onset time was marked on the monitor from local anesthetic administration to onset of anesthesia and recorded in the anesthesia record.

Withdrawal criteria. Withdrawal of consent, failed block (need for general anesthesia or additional intraoperative analgesia attributable to block failure), discharge before 6 postoperative hours, and block-related complications (puncture-site hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, persistent neurological deficit or allergic reaction).

Sample size and analysis. A sample of 138 participants (46 per group) was calculated with G*Power (alpha 0.05, power 0.80, effect size d = 0.5). Analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. Groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons, and with the chi-square or Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests for categorical variables; effect estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals. A p value below 0.05 was considered significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Upper Extremity Fracture
  • Anesthesia, Conduction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Brachial Plexus Block
  • Supraclavicular Block
  • Ropivacaine
  • Lidocaine
  • Epinephrine
  • Local Anesthetic Mixture
  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Postoperative Analgesia
  • Orthopedic Surgery
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 138 is above the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults of any sex aged 18 to 59 years.
  • Scheduled for upper limb orthopedic or trauma surgery under brachial plexus block at Hospital General de Zona No. 3, IMSS, Aguascalientes.
  • (ASA) physical status I to III.
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to ropivacaine, lidocaine or epinephrine.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Uncooperative patients.
  • Previous brachial plexus injury.
  • Upper limb neuropathy.
  • Inability to read or visual impairment preventing use of the pain scale.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
138 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group C: Ropivacaine 0.375%

    Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 15 mL of sterile water for injection), single perineural injection.

    Drug: ropivacaine

  • Experimental
    Group L: Ropivacaine 0.375% + Lidocaine 1%

    Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% plus lidocaine 1% (15 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 15 mL of lidocaine 2%), single perineural injection.

    Drug: lidocaine

  • Experimental
    Group E: Ropivacaine 0.375% + Lidocaine 1% With Epinephrine

    Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% plus lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (15 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 15 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine; final epinephrine concentration 2.5 micrograms/mL, 75 micrograms total), single perineural injection.

    Drug: lidocaine with epinephrine

Interventions

  • Ropivacaine 112.5 mg (15 mL of 0.75%) administered perineurally in an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block, diluted to a total volume of 30 mL.

  • Lidocaine 300 mg (15 mL of 2%) mixed with ropivacaine for perineural administration in the supraclavicular brachial plexus block (final lidocaine concentration 1%).

  • Druglidocaine with epinephrine

    Drug pages: Lidocaine · Epinephrine

    Lidocaine 300 mg with epinephrine 75 micrograms (15 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine) mixed with ropivacaine for perineural administration (final concentrations: lidocaine 1%, epinephrine 2.5 micrograms/mL).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity at 6 Hours

    Pain intensity measured with the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), compared among the three groups.

    Time frame: 6 hours after the end of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity at 0 and 12 Hours

    Pain intensity measured with the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: Immediately after the end of surgery (0 hours) and 12 hours after the end of surgery

  2. Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Analgesia (Duration of Analgesia)

    Number of participants who received rescue analgesia at each assessment; participants without rescue at 6 hours were considered to have an analgesia duration of at least 6 hours.

    Time frame: At 0, 6 and 12 hours after the end of surgery

  3. Rescue Analgesic Consumption by Drug Type

    Number of participants receiving each rescue analgesic (acetaminophen, ketorolac, diclofenac, lysine clonixinate or opioids) and dose administered.

    Time frame: Up to 12 hours after the end of surgery

  4. Number of Participants Receiving Postoperative Opioids

    Number of participants who received at least one opioid

    Time frame: Up to 12 hours after the end of surgery

  5. Upper Limb Motor Block (Modified Bromage Scale)

    Motor block of the blocked upper limb graded with the modified Bromage scale: 0 = full movement, 1 = decreased strength, 2 = partial movement, 3 = complete motor block.

    Time frame: At 0, 6 and 12 hours after the end of surgery

  6. Number of Participants With Block-Related Adverse Events

    Nausea, vomiting, paresthesia, puncture-site hematoma, Horner syndrome, dyspnea or phrenic nerve block, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

    Time frame: Up to 12 hours after the end of surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Block Onset Time

    Time in minutes from local anesthetic administration to onset of anesthesia, marked on the monitor and recorded in the anesthesia record by the attending anesthesiologist.

    Time frame: Intraoperative, from local anesthetic injection to onset of anesthesia

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital General de Zona No. 3, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
    Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20908, Mexico
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant data underlying the results reported (baseline characteristics, pain scores, motor block, rescue analgesia and adverse events), together with the data dictionary, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form and analytic code.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning 6 months after publication of the results and for 5 years.

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal approved by the principal investigator; a data use agreement will be required. Requests should be sent to the principal investigator.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07907666
Responsible party
Cristina González Ramírez (Anesthesiologist, Principal Investigator, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
Start date
Mar 2, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 16, 2026
Completion
Apr 17, 2026
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Cristina González Ramírez, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Lidocaine · Epinephrine

Start the discussion