ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07906574Updated Oct 30, 2026

Effects of Swimming and Tennis on Mental Health, Fatigue, and Sleep in Young Women

An interventional study of Swimming Exercise and Tennis Exercise in Mental Health and Psychological Well-Being, Fatigue and Sleep Quality, sponsored by Fahri Safa Çınarlı. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Primary conditionFatigueRegistry: Psychological Well-BeingReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Psychological Well-Being — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Fatigue
Why
  1. Psychological Well-Being is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Fatigue.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Fahri Safa Çınarlı · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study compared the effects of swimming and tennis on mental health, fatigue, and sleep quality in young women who were not regularly physically active.

A total of 34 women aged 18-25 years were randomly assigned to either a swimming group or a tennis group. Both groups participated in supervised exercise sessions lasting 45 minutes, three times per week, for eight weeks.

Participants completed questionnaires before and after the exercise programs to assess anxiety, depressive symptoms, psychological well-being, perceived stress, fatigue, and sleep quality.

Thirty participants completed the study and were included in the final analysis.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether swimming and tennis had different effects on psychological health, fatigue, and sleep quality in physically inactive young women.

Read the detailed description

This study was conducted as a two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of swimming and tennis exercise on psychological health, fatigue, and sleep quality in physically inactive young women.

Women aged 18-25 years who had not regularly participated in structured exercise during the preceding six months were eligible for inclusion. Participants were required to have low physical activity levels, defined as less than 600 MET-min/week according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), and to be capable of safely performing both swimming and tennis activities.

Following baseline assessments, 34 participants were randomly allocated to swimming or tennis in a 1:1 ratio (17 participants per group), using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Group assignments were concealed until completion of baseline assessments.

Both intervention groups completed an eight-week supervised exercise program consisting of three 45-minute sessions per week. Each session included a five-minute warm-up, a 35-minute main exercise phase, and a five-minute cool-down. The swimming program primarily involved freestyle swimming with progressive changes in swimming distance and recovery intervals. The tennis program included forehand and backhand exercises, footwork drills, and controlled rallies with progressively increasing difficulty. Exercise intensity was monitored using the Borg CR10 Rating of Perceived Exertion scale.

Psychological health and related outcomes were assessed using six validated questionnaires: the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

Baseline assessments were conducted two days before the first exercise session, and post-intervention assessments were completed 48 hours after the final session. Four participants withdrew during the study, leaving 30 participants (15 per group) in the final analysis.

The study was designed to examine whether the two exercise modalities produced different changes in psychological health, fatigue, and sleep quality when exercise frequency, session duration, and progression of perceived exertion were comparable.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mental Health and Psychological Well-Being
  • Fatigue
  • Sleep Quality

Keywords

  • Exercise modality
  • mental health
  • depressive symptoms
  • perceived stress
  • young women
03

In context

Fatigue Reclassified

2,229 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 426 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 54 across 1,757 interventional studies indexed under Fatigue.

Browse Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Fahri Safa Çınarlı as lead sponsor.

Compared within Fatigue, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Psychological Well-Being. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants aged 18-25 years.
  • No regular participation in structured exercise during the preceding six months.
  • Low physical activity level, defined as less than 600 MET-min/week according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF).
  • Ability to safely participate in swimming and tennis exercise, including basic swimming skills.
  • Provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed cardiovascular, neurological, musculoskeletal, or other medical conditions that could contraindicate exercise participation.
  • Diagnosed psychiatric disorders or ongoing psychiatric treatment that could substantially influence the study outcomes.
  • Regular use of medications known to affect sleep or psychological status.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Any other condition that could prevent regular participation in the intervention programs.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Swimming

    Participants assigned to the swimming group completed an eight-week supervised swimming program consisting of 45-minute sessions three times per week. The program primarily included freestyle swimming, progressive swimming distances, and structured recovery intervals.

    Behavioral: Swimming Exercise

  • Experimental
    Tennis

    Participants assigned to the tennis group completed an eight-week supervised tennis program consisting of 45-minute sessions three times per week. The program included forehand and backhand drills, footwork exercises, and controlled rallies with progressively increasing difficulty.

    Behavioral: Tennis Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralSwimming Exercise

    Supervised swimming exercise, three sessions per week for eight weeks, with 45 minutes per session and progressively increasing exercise difficulty.

  • BehavioralTennis Exercise

    Supervised tennis exercise, three sessions per week for eight weeks, with 45 minutes per session and progressively increasing exercise difficulty.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Depressive Symptoms Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Depressive symptoms were assessed using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Each item is scored from 0 to 3, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Change was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  2. Change in Perceived Stress Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10)

    Perceived stress was assessed using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). Each item is scored from 0 to 4, with four positively worded items reverse-scored. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress. Change was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  3. Change in Anxiety Symptoms Measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

    Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Each item is scored from 0 to 3, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity. Change was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  4. Change in Psychological Well-Being Measured by the WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)

    Psychological well-being was assessed using the WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The five items are scored from 0 to 5. The raw total score (0-25) is multiplied by four to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better psychological well-being. Change was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score; positive values indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  5. Change in Fatigue Measured by the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS)

    Fatigue was assessed using the 11-item Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS), covering physical and mental fatigue. Each item was scored from 0 to 3, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 33. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity. Change was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  6. Change in Sleep Quality Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which evaluates seven components of sleep over the preceding month. The global score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Change was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Inonu University
    Malatya, Battalgazi 44000, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2026 to primary completion in Oct 2026, 1 month.

Of 936 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fatigue, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27. This study's 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 989 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2026
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
StartActual
Aug 5, 2026
Primary completionActual
Oct 4, 2026
CompletionActual
Oct 4, 2026
Last update
Oct 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07906574
Lead sponsor
Fahri Safa Çınarlı
Responsible party
Fahri Safa Çınarlı (Associate Professor, Inonu University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
Start date
Aug 5, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 4, 2026
Completion
Oct 4, 2026
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion