ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07906184Updated Oct 30, 2026

Recreational Badminton, Sleep and Melatonin

An interventional study of Recreational Badminton and To be used for comparison purposes. There is no intervention. in Sedentary Behavior, sponsored by Inonu University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Sponsored by Inonu University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Jul 2026).
Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Poor sleep quality is increasingly prevalent among physically inactive young adults and is associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Regular physical activity may improve sleep quality and circadian regulation, although evidence regarding recreational sports remains limited. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of a 4 week supervised recreational badminton program on sleep quality and salivary melatonin concentrations in physically inactive young adults. Participants were randomly assigned to either a badminton intervention group or a control group. Sleep quality and salivary melatonin levels were assessed before and after the intervention.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate whether a 4 week supervised recreational badminton program could improve sleep quality and influence salivary melatonin concentrations in physically inactive young adults. Poor sleep quality is increasingly recognized as an important health concern among young adults and may negatively affect physical functioning, psychological well-being, cognitive performance, and daily functioning. Although regular physical activity has been consistently associated with better sleep outcomes, evidence regarding the effects of recreational sports such as badminton remains limited. Badminton is a dynamic, enjoyable, and relatively accessible sport that combines aerobic and anaerobic activity, coordination, agility and intermittent high intensity movements, which may provide both physiological and psychological benefits. In this study, physically inactive young adults were randomly allocated to either a supervised badminton intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group participated in a structured 4 week recreational badminton program, whereas participants in the control group maintained their usual daily routines. Sleep quality and salivary melatonin concentrations were evaluated before and after the intervention to assess both subjective sleep-related outcomes and a physiological marker associated with sleep wake regulation and circadian rhythms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sedentary Behavior

Keywords

  • Badminton
  • Sleep Quality
  • Salivary Melatonin
  • Physical Inactivity
  • Young Adults
03

In context

Sedentary Behavior

375 studies on the registry are indexed under Sedentary Behavior; 165 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 18 is below the median of 70 across 322 interventional studies indexed under Sedentary Behavior.

Browse Sedentary Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Inonu University is the lead sponsor of 391 studies on the registry; 93 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals who agree to participate in the study
  • Healthy university students aged 18-30

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who do not agree to participate in the study
  • Individuals with any chronic disease
  • Individuals with any health condition that would prevent them from exercising
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The group that exercises

    The study is planned to last four weeks, during which participants will undergo various assessment methods. Healthy university students aged 18-30 will be included in the study. Individuals who exercise will be defined as those engaging in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity recreational badminton activity per week, while sedentary individuals will be defined as those exercising for less than 30 minutes per week. The G\*Power 3.1 program was used to determine the sample size. Based on a study examining changes in sleep quality following different exercise interventions (Jurado-Fasoli et al., 2020), the effect size was calculated as 0.40 (eta-squared = 0.138), with a statistical power of 0.95 and a significance level of 0.05. With a design involving two groups and three measurement points, it was determined that a minimum of 9 participants per group-totaling 18 participants-would be sufficient. Data Collection Tools - Assessment of Sleep Quality: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inde

    Behavioral: Recreational Badminton

  • Active comparator
    The group that does not exercise

    The study is planned to last four weeks, during which participants will undergo various assessment methods. Healthy university students aged 18-30 will be included in the study. Individuals who exercise will be defined as those engaging in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity recreational badminton activity per week, while sedentary individuals will be defined as those exercising for less than 30 minutes per week. The G\*Power 3.1 program was used to determine the sample size. Based on a study examining changes in sleep quality following different exercise interventions (Jurado-Fasoli et al., 2020), the effect size was calculated as 0.40 (eta-squared = 0.138), with a statistical power of 0.95 and a significance level of 0.05. With a design involving two groups and three measurement points, it was determined that a minimum of 9 participants per group-totaling 18 participants-would be sufficient. Data Collection Tools - Assessment of Sleep Quality: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inde

    Diagnostic Test: To be used for comparison purposes. There is no intervention.

Interventions

  • BehavioralRecreational Badminton

    It is well established that regular exercise has positive effects on both physiological and psychological health. Existing research indicates that regular physical activity reduces sleep latency, increases sleep duration, and improves overall sleep quality. Furthermore, exercise can contribute to the regulation of circadian rhythms by influencing the secretion of the hormone melatonin. Consequently, experts recommend exercise programs to individuals to improve their health status, sleep, and quality of life. It has been noted that exercise facilitates falling asleep, promotes deeper sleep, and enhances how individuals feel upon waking in the morning. However, studies directly comparing melatonin secretion and sleep quality between individuals who engage in recreational exercise and those who do not remain limited. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis between these two groups to more clearly elucidate the effects of recreational exercise on sleep. The findings are expected

  • Diagnostic testTo be used for comparison purposes. There is no intervention.

    Saliva samples will be collected from this group without any intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Salivary Melatonin Measurements

    Melatonin levels will be determined using saliva samples collected from participants at three different times of the day (8:00 AM, 8:00 PM, and 12:00 AM). Analyses will be performed using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method.

    Time frame: 3 MONTHS

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07906184
Lead sponsor
Inonu University
Responsible party
ZEYNEP ÜNVER (Lecturer, Inonu University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
Start date
Mar 24, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Zeynep Ünver, Lecturer
principal investigator · Inonu University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion