An interventional study of non-mesh inguinal hernia needle and conventional needle set in Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or Gangrene, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.
Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a prospective, single-blinded and randomized clinical trial, and will be conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi branch in Taiwan.
Why is this study being done? Inguinal hernia is a common condition in adults. It can be classified into different types, and more than half of adult inguinal hernias are belonged to the "indirect" type.
Traditionally, inguinal hernias are repaired with artificial mesh in adults. Since 2018, we use the laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous internal ring suture (PIRS), which has been proofed to be safe and effectiveness in repairing the pediatric indirect inguinal hernia, to treat the adult indirect inguinal hernias. More than 150 adult patients were treated by using this method with good results and low recurrence rate.
However, conventional needles for the pediatric group are too short and weak to operate on the adult group. Now there is a new device, laparoscopic non-mesh hernia needle set, designed specifically for adults. We would like to evaluate whether this new device can: (1) Shorten the operation time; (2) Reduce postoperative pain; (3) Maintain a low recurrence rate
The participants, whose hernia confirmed to be the indirect type under laparoscopic inspection, would be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
(1) The control group: using conventional needle set for PIRS; (2) The experimental group: using laparoscopic non-mesh hernia needle set for PIRS.
Both groups would undergo the same surgical method except the needle devices. For the participants with inguinal hernias other than the indirect type, an adequate mesh repair be performed according to the Guideline of Hernia Surg (Hernia. 2018; 22(1): 17-18)
After surgery, three follow-up visits within six months would be arranged to all participants. Each visit will take about one hour. During these visits, we will:
(1) Record about recovery and pain conditions; (2) Check surgical wound; (3) Evaluate whether the hernia has recurred.
3. What are the possible complications? The risks of surgery are similar whether the participants join the study or not. Possible complications include: (1) Postoperative pain; (2) Hernia recurrence; (3) Wound infection; (4) Bruising or bleeding under the skin at the needle site
This study will help us to determine whether the new needle set could decrease the complication rate.
4. Participation in this study is completely voluntary. For the patients unwilling to participate this study, they will receive the standard procedures at present, including: (1) Open hernia repair with mesh, Lichtenstein method. (2) Laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh, TEP or TAPP. (3) Laparoscopic repair using the conventional hernia needle
Hernia, a common human disease, is defined as any organ or tissue leaving its normal location via congenital or acquired weak point, defect or fissure. Hernia frequently develops in inguinal (inguinal hernia), femoral (femoral hernia), umbilical (umbilical hernia), incision (incisional hernia) or diaphragmatic areas (diaphragmatic hernia).
Inguinal hernia accounts for more than 90% of all hernia. It is estimated 27% male and 3% female would be bothered by the inguinal hernia throughout the life. There were about 30 thousands of surgeries for hernia in Taiwan, and about 20 millions of surgeries for hernia worldwide annually. Inguinal hernia is classified into direct and indirect type. When testes passed through the inguinal canals into the scrotum before or after birth, the internal ring of inguinal canal would close gradually. Indirect type of inguinal hernia is abdominal organs or tissues enter the inguinal canal due to non-obliteration of internal ring. When inguinal hernia develops, one protruding mass would be seen on the groin area, and the patient feel pain and swelling. If the hernia could not be reduced spontaneously, the organ/tissue in the hernia sac would undergo blood supply disturbance, and organ/tissue necrosis, bowel perforation, even death follows. Surgery is usually suggested if one patient is diagnosed with inguinal hernia.
Open herniorrhaphy, which ligating the internal ring in the pre-peritoneal layer and then removing the hernia sac, is used to manage the indirect type of inguinal hernia traditionally. Incidence of inguinal hernia in children is about 5-6%, and almost is indirect type. Most patients are newborn to 6 years old. In 2006, Dr. Patkowski published percutaneous internal ring suture (PIRS) under laparoscopy. In PIRS the inner ring opening is closed by suture line in the pre-peritoneal layer under single-port laparoscopy. The hernia sac is remained without removal. It differs from the open herniorrhaphy is that the knots will tie the peritoneal layer and musculo-fascial layer at the same time, and patients were more painful after surgery. After 20-year observations, there was little difference found in the operation time and hernia recurrence rate between the open herniorrhaphy and PIRS. Surgical scars were smaller after PIRS, and it made PIRS being the routine surgery for indirect inguinal hernia in several children's hospitals in the America and Europe. In our hospital, there were more than 300 children with indirect inguinal hernia underwent single port laparoscopic PIRS since 2016. The operation time was less than 20 minutes in average. These children did not need admission, their recovery time was shorter, and the hernia recurrence rate was zero.
In adults, their inguinal hernia could be indirect, direct even mixed types. Inguinal hernia typing in adults often is not confirmed actually before surgery, yet the problem could be resolved during laparoscopy. Traditionally the main surgical method was to repair the inguinal hernia with mesh in the Hesselbach's triangle regardless of hernia type. The method could not satisfy every patient's requirement, and the overall hernia recurrence rate is 30-50%. In fact, 67-82% of adult cases with inguinal hernia belonged to the indirect type according to the published researches. Therefore, we thought single port laparoscopic PIRS could be utilized in adults also. In past 6 years, more than 100 adults underwent single port laparoscopic PIRS at our hospital for their indirect inguinal hernia. Hernia recurrence and chronic pain rate were 5%.
There is one new inguinal ring repair needle set developed recently, and which is suitable for single-port laparoscopic hernia surgery. The needle set is composed of puncture needle and suture guide needle. The puncture needle is composed of outer and inner sheath, and it can easily puncture and peel off the tissue. When the puncture needle arrives the inner ring of inguinal canal, removing the inner sheath, and outer sheath is left in the musculo-fascial layer. The suture guide needle is inserted into the outer sheath to tie and close the inner ring. The knot will naturally penetrate the muscular layer and stay on the peritoneal layer. In general, this hernia needle set can solve the inconvenience during the surgery and post-operative pain of patients.
This is a single-blind and randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new inguinal needle set in managing the adults' indirect inguinal hernia.
543 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Inguinal; 92 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 96 is close to the median of 90 across 395 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Inguinal.
Browse Hernia, Inguinal studies →Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,096 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
If employees or students of the study institution are considered for participation, they may be enrolled only if all of the following conditions are met:
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
non-mesh inguinal needle set
Device: non-mesh inguinal hernia needle
conventional needle set
Device: conventional needle set
enrolled patients without indirect inguinal hernia
Non-mesh inguinal hernia needle is used for indirect inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopy. It is composed of puncture needle and suture needle.
Conventional needle set is used traditionally for percutaneous internal ring suture in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan.
post operational pain
Evaluated by Mankoski Pain Scale (score 0-10, zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain) on the operation day and one week after surgery, and recording frequency and kinds of analgesics used after surgery by charts
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Operation time
The operation time, measured in minutes, is defined as the time elapsed from insertion of the trocar through the umbilicus to its removal from the umbilicus at the end of the operation.
Time frame: During the surgery
Time to resumption of daily activities
The number of days from surgery until the patient resumes usual daily activities, including work, exercise, and household activities.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Ipsilateral inguinal hernia recurrence rate within six months after surgery
The proportion of patients who develop recurrent inguinal hernia on the operated side within six months after surgery. The recurrence rate will be calculated as the number of patients with recurrence divided by the total number of patients evaluated for recurrence, multiplied by 100%.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Wound infection rate
The proportion of patients who develop a surgical wound infection following surgery during the prespecified follow-up period. The wound infection rate will be calculated as the number of patients with a wound infection divided by the total number of patients evaluated for wound infection, multiplied by 100%.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Plan to share: No
Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 13 months after the start.
Of 177 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Inguinal, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 13 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 186 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 36.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital →