ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07916233Updated Nov 4, 2026

Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Inguinal Hernia and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Beni-Suef University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 8 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Beni-Suef University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 4, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates two ultrasound-guided nerve block techniques-Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block-for pain relief in children undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair.

Children aged 2 to 8 years scheduled for unilateral open inguinal hernia surgery under general anesthesia will be randomly assigned to receive either a lumbar ESP block or a TAP block before surgery begins. Both groups will receive standardized pain management with non-opioid pain relievers (paracetamol and ibuprofen).

The main goal of the study is to compare how long each nerve block provides effective pain relief before the child requires additional pain medication (rescue opioid) within the first 24 hours after surgery. The study will also assess overall pain scores, total opioid consumption, postoperative recovery, and safety.

Read the detailed description

Effective postoperative analgesia is essential in pediatric open inguinal hernia repair to attenuate the surgical stress response, facilitate early ambulation, and enable same-day discharge. While caudal epidural block has traditionally served as the standard regional technique in pediatric lower abdominal surgery, concerns regarding motor block, urinary retention, and rare neuraxial complications have driven interest toward peripheral ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks.

Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block provides somatic analgesia to the anterolateral abdominal wall by targeting the anterior rami of lower thoracolumbar spinal nerves (T10-L1). Recent meta-analyses demonstrate that TAP block prolongs analgesia duration and reduces rescue opioid requirements compared to caudal blockade.

Ultrasound-guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane technique where local anesthetic deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle at the L1 transverse process produces craniocaudal spread, blocking dorsal and ventral rami. Recent trials suggest lumbar ESPB provides effective somatic analgesia, but the degree of visceral inguinal coverage via genitofemoral and ilioinguinal pathways remains debated.

Direct, prospective head-to-head comparisons between ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB and TAP block in pediatric open inguinal hernia repair remain limited-particularly studies utilizing a double-blind methodology, standardized multimodal analgesia, and identical local anesthetic dosing.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial aims to compare the duration and quality of postoperative analgesia provided by ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB versus TAP block using bupivacaine 0.25% (0.5 mL/kg, maximum 20 mL) in children aged 2-8 years undergoing elective unilateral open inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia. The primary hypothesis is that lumbar ESPB is non-inferior to TAP block with respect to time to first rescue analgesia within 24 hours postoperatively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inguinal Hernia
  • Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Pediatric Anesthesia
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Bupivacaine
  • Herniorrhaphy
  • Acute Pain Management
03

In context

Hernia, Inguinal

567 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Inguinal; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is close to the median of 90 across 420 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Inguinal.

Browse Hernia, Inguinal studies →

Lead sponsor

Beni-Suef University is the lead sponsor of 341 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 2 to 8 years at the time of enrollment.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
  • Scheduled for elective unilateral open inguinal hernia repair as day-case or short-stay surgery.
  • Body weight between 10 kg and 35 kg (to ensure local anesthetic dosing remains within predefined safe exposure limits).
  • Written informed consent provided by parents or legal guardians, and age-appropriate assent from children where developmentally feasible.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of trial participation by parents or legal guardians.
  • Known allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to amide local anesthetics, paracetamol, or ibuprofen.
  • Coagulopathy, bleeding disorder, or current anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy.
  • Active localized infection at or near either planned injection site (paraspinal or lateral abdominal wall).
  • Pre-existing neurological, neuromuscular, or spinal disease affecting the lower limbs or trunk.
  • Significant hepatic, renal, or cardiac dysfunction.
  • Severe cerebral palsy, developmental delay, or neurobehavioral disorders resulting in abnormal baseline tone or movement that would render behavioral pain scoring (FLACC) unreliable.
  • Bilateral inguinal hernia repair (due to bilateral block considerations).
  • Previous participation in this clinical trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group E: Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

    Children in Group E receive an ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) performed in the lateral decubitus position prior to surgical incision following general anesthesia induction. A 22-gauge 50-mm echogenic needle is advanced in-plane to contact the L1 transverse process deep to the erector spinae muscle. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection verification with 1-2 mL saline, bupivacaine 0.25% at a volume of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 20 mL; total dose 1.25 mg/kg) is injected incrementally. Identical sterile dressings are applied over both the paraspinal and abdominal block sites to maintain blinding.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

  • Active comparator
    Group T: Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block

    Children in Group T receive an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block performed in the supine position prior to surgical incision following general anesthesia induction. A 22-gauge 50-mm echogenic needle is advanced in-plane into the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles at the mid-axillary line. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection verification with 1-2 mL saline, bupivacaine 0.25% at a volume of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 20 mL; total dose 1.25 mg/kg) is injected incrementally. Identical sterile dressings are applied over both the paraspinal and abdominal block sites to maintain blinding.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

    Single-shot ultrasound-guided lumbar ESP block performed at the L1 transverse process level using bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 20 mL, total dose 1.25 mg/kg) deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle. Administered after general anesthesia induction and before surgical incision. Standardized multimodal background analgesia (IV paracetamol 15 mg/kg q6h ± oral/IV ibuprofen 10 mg/kg q8h) is co-administered postoperatively.

    Also known as: L-ESPB

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block

    Single-shot ultrasound-guided TAP block performed between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles at the mid-axillary line using bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 20 mL, total dose 1.25 mg/kg). Administered after general anesthesia induction and before surgical incision. Standardized multimodal background analgesia (IV paracetamol 15 mg/kg q6h ± oral/IV ibuprofen 10 mg/kg q8h) is co-administered postoperatively.

    Also known as: TAP block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Postoperative Rescue Analgesia Request

    Measured as the duration (in hours) from the end of general anesthesia (tracheal extubation) until the first administration of rescue opioid. Rescue analgesia is triggered when a trained blinded observer records a Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain score greater than 3 on two consecutive assessments separated by 15 minutes.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative FLACC Pain Scores

    Assessed using the validated Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain scale (total score range: 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity). Recorded at discrete in-hospital time points.

    Time frame: At PACU arrival (0 hours), 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours postoperatively

  2. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Postoperative FLACC Pain Scores

    Calculated using the trapezoidal rule from serial FLACC pain scores (range 0-10) recorded over the first 6 post-anesthesia hours to derive cumulative pain exposure (score·hours).

    Time frame: From PACU arrival (0 hours) through 6 hours postoperatively

  3. Percentage of Participants Requiring Postoperative Rescue Opioids

    Measured as the proportion of participants in each group who receive at least one dose of rescue opioid analgesia within the observation window.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

  4. Total Cumulative 24-Hour Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    Cumulative intravenous and oral rescue opioid consumption converted to standard Morphine Milligram Equivalents per kilogram of body weight (MME/kg).

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  5. Total Intraoperative Fentanyl Consumption

    Total dose of intravenous fentanyl administered intraoperatively for rescue hemodynamic responses (heart rate or mean arterial pressure \> 20% above baseline), expressed in micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg).

    Time frame: Intraoperatively (from surgical incision to skin closure)

  6. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    Percentage of participants experiencing at least one episode of postoperative nausea or vomiting requiring antiemetic treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

  7. Time to First Mobilization

    Measured in hours from the end of anesthesia to first unassisted/age-appropriate ambulation

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

  8. Parental Satisfaction Score at 24 Hours

    Assessed via structured telephone follow-up using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very Dissatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction).

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  9. Incidence of Block-Related and Anesthetic Adverse Events

    Percentage of participants experiencing block-related or systemic complications, including local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), vascular puncture, hematoma, local infection, pneumothorax, or urinary retention requiring catheterization.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

  10. Incidence of Postoperative Lower Extremity Motor Blockade

    Assessed using a modified Bromage scale or age-appropriate motor strength score (ability to flex knees and ankles) prior to discharge to confirm complete absence of lower limb motor weakness.

    Time frame: At PACU arrival, 2 hours postoperatively, and prior to discharge (up to 24 hours)

  11. Time to Hospital Discharge Readiness

    Measured as the time duration (in hours) from the end of general anesthesia (extubation) until achievement of standard discharge criteria (Modified Aldrete score ≥ 9, stable vital signs for ≥ 1 hour, FLACC pain score ≤ 3 on scheduled non-opioid analgesics alone, adequate oral fluid intake without intractable nausea or vomiting, and absence of active surgical or regional block complications

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data collected during the trial, including baseline demographic characteristics, primary outcome measurements (time to first rescue analgesia), serial FLACC pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, and recorded adverse events, will be made available upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will become available starting 6 months after publication of the main study results in a peer-reviewed journal and will remain accessible for up to 36 months following publication.

Access criteria: Data will be shared with qualified academic investigators for secondary meta-analyses or scientific inquiries. Requests must be submitted directly via email to the principal investigator (Dr. Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael). Provision of data will require a formal data-use agreement and institutional approval from Beni-Suef University Faculty of Medicine.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07916233
Responsible party
Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael (Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-suef university, Beni-Suef University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael, MD
Contact
Kmnmk87@med.bsu.edu.eg
00201288549959

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion