ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07900373ECHINO-PCPUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Echinocandin Added to Standard Treatment for Severe Pneumocystis Pneumonia

A Phase 3 interventional study of Echinocandins and Placebo (0.9% Sodium chloride) infusion in Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia, sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
416
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Preclinical studies and retrospective clinical data suggest that adjunctive echinocandin therapy may improve outcomes in adults with severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). However, the benefit of adding an echinocandin to standard PCP treatment has not been established in a definitive randomized controlled trial. The aim of this trial is:

1. In adults hospitalized with severe PCP, to determine whether adding an echinocandin to standard anti-PCP therapy improves net clinical outcomes by Day 30 compared with standard anti-PCP therapy plus matching placebo.

Read the detailed description

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a serious lung infection that mainly affects people with weakened immune systems, including people with HIV, cancer, organ transplants, immune-system disorders, or medicines that suppress the immune system. Severe PCP can cause low oxygen levels and may require intensive respiratory support. Although medicines are available to treat PCP, evidence supporting treatment approaches remains limited. Echinocandins are antifungal medicines that act on a stage of the Pneumocystis organism containing beta-1,3-D-glucan. Laboratory findings and retrospective clinical data provide a rationale for studying this approach, but its benefit in severe PCP has not been established in a definitive randomized controlled trial.

This Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial is part of the SPIRIT-PCP platform trial. The purpose is to determine whether adding an echinocandin to standard treatment for severe PCP improves clinical outcomes compared with standard treatment plus a matching placebo.

Eligible adults hospitalized with severe PCP who meet the platform and ECHINO-PCP eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups. The echinocandin group will receive standard anti-PCP therapy plus an echinocandin antifungal medication. The placebo group will receive standard anti-PCP therapy plus a matching intravenous placebo consisting of 0.9% sodium chloride. The echinocandin used at each participating site will be selected from the study-approved products, which include caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin. The study is blinded, meaning that participants and their treating and study teams generally will not know which treatment has been assigned.

Study treatment will be administered by intravenous infusion until hospital discharge or for 7 days, whichever occurs first. Participants will be followed for up to 180 days from the beginning of PCP treatment.

The primary outcome will be assessed by Day 30 and will compare the groups using a hierarchical composite of clinical outcomes, including death, the need for new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation, severe medication-related reactions considered probably related to treatment, changes in PCP treatment because of presumed treatment failure or a probable medication-related reaction, and hospital length of stay among survivors.

Secondary outcomes will include the individual components of the primary outcome, medication-related adverse reactions, oxygen and ventilation requirements, and hospital length of stay. Longer-term outcomes will include quality of life at Days 30 and 180, recurrence of PCP infection, and death from any cause by Day 180. Study information will be collected during hospitalization, through medical records and follow-up assessments, and through planned follow-up contacts.

The findings may help determine whether adding an echinocandin to standard PCP treatment improves clinical outcomes for adults hospitalized with severe PCP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia

Keywords

  • Severe PCP
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii
  • Echinocandin
  • Caspofungin
  • Micafungin
  • Anidulafungin
03

In context

Pneumonia, Pneumocystis

108 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 416 is above the median of 231 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia, Pneumocystis.

Browse Pneumonia, Pneumocystis studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre is the lead sponsor of 421 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  1. adults (≥18 years old) in an emergency department or hospital with a proven or probable diagnosis of PCP.
  2. Severe PCP, defined as proven or probable PCP with new or increased PCP-attributable hypoxemic respiratory failure meeting at least one of the following criteria: a requirement for ≥4 L/min supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula to maintain oxygenation >94%; a requirement for FiO₂ ≥0.35 via a controlled oxygen-delivery device; or a requirement for advanced respiratory support, including invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). For patients with chronic baseline oxygen use, the increased support must be attributable to PCP.
  3. Currently receiving, or eligible to receive, systemic anti-PCP therapy for the current episode. Patients receiving empiric PCP treatment may be enrolled before microbiological or pathological results are available if results are expected within 1 week.
  4. No later than 48 hours after screening for inclusion and before more than 3 days of PCP therapy have elapsed.
  5. Provision of by the participant or substitute decision maker, as locally applicable.

Clinical Exclusion Criteria

  1. More than 3 days of effective anti-PCP therapy before enrolment in ECHINO-PCP.
  2. Another infection or clinical indication that independently requires echinocandin therapy.
  3. Known allergy or to echinocandins.
  4. Receipt of more than 24 hours of caspofungin, micafungin, or anidulafungin, or receipt of one dose of rezafungin, before enrolment.
  5. PCP is no longer considered the most likely diagnosis at the time of randomization.
  6. PCP therapy has already been escalated or changed for presumed treatment failure before enrolment.
  7. Death is deemed imminent (\<48 hours), as determined by the treating team and site investigator.
  8. Treatment with antifungals is inconsistent with the patient's advanced care directives.

Administrative Exclusion Criteria

  1. Inability to obtain informed consent, or refusal to consent by the patient or substitute decision maker.
  2. Treating team declines participation.
  3. Inability to ensure reliable follow-up (e.g., lack of means of communication or patient non-resident of the jurisdiction).
  4. Prior enrolment in ECHINO-PCP.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
416 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Echinocandin

    Echinocandin IV + standard anti-PCP therapy until discharge or 7 days, whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Echinocandins

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    0.9% sodium chloride IV placebo + standard anti-PCP therapy until discharge or 7 days, whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Placebo (0.9% Sodium chloride) infusion

Interventions

  • DrugEchinocandins

    Caspofungin 70 mg IV Day 1, then 50 mg daily; micafungin 100 mg IV daily; or anidulafungin 200 mg IV Day 1, then 100 mg daily.

  • DrugPlacebo (0.9% Sodium chloride) infusion

    0.9% sodium chloride IV.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hierarchical Composite Clinical Outcome Assessed Using the Win Odds/Win Ratio

    Hierarchical composite of death, new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), new invasive mechanical ventilation, CTCAE grade 4 adverse drug reactions considered at least probably related to treatment, new non-invasive ventilation, change in PCP therapy due to presumed treatment failure or a probable adverse drug reaction, and hospital length of stay among survivors. Assessed using the Win Odds approach.

    Time frame: Day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants who died

    Proportion of participants who died

    Time frame: Through Day 30

  2. Hospital length of stay among survivors

    Length of hospital stay among participants who survive.

    Time frame: Through Day 30

  3. CTCAE grade 3 and 4 adverse drug reactions

    Proportion of participants with CTCAE grade 3 or 4 adverse drug reactions considered at least probably related to treatment, by organ system.

    Time frame: Through Day 30

  4. Time to occurrence of primary outcome components

    Time to each component of the primary outcome, including death, new respiratory support, treatment changes, and severe adverse drug reactions.

    Time frame: Through Day 30

  5. Proportion of patients requiring new ECMO

    Proportion of patients requiring new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

    Time frame: Through Day 30

  6. Proportion of patients requiring new mechanical ventilation

    Proportion of patients requiring new mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Through Day 30

  7. Proportion of patients with CTCAE grade 4 adverse drug reactions considered at least probably related to treatment

    Proportion of patients with CTCAE grade 4 adverse drug reactions considered at least probably related to treatment

    Time frame: Through day 30

  8. Proportion of patients requiring new non-invasive ventilation,

    Proportion of patients requiring new non-invasive ventilation,

    Time frame: Through day 30

  9. Proportion of patients with change in PCP therapy due to presumed treatment failure or a probable adverse drug reaction

    Proportion of patients with change in PCP therapy due to presumed treatment failure or a probable adverse drug reaction

    Time frame: Through day 30

Other outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    Quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level) questionnaire The EQ-5D-5L measures health-related quality of life using a two-part self-report questionnaire that evaluates functional status across five core dimensions and records an overall self-rated health score

    Time frame: Days 30 and 180

  2. Recurrence of PCP infection

    Occurrence of recurrent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.

    Time frame: Through Day 180

  3. All-cause mortality

    Death from any cause.

    Time frame: Through Day 180

  4. Quality of life using the visual analogue scale (VAS)

    VAS rates overall health from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health), where higher values are better

    Time frame: Day 30, day 180

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Taniguchi J, Aso S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combined with echinocandins versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole alone for Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients without human immunodeficiency virus infection: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. J Infect Chemother. 2025 Jan;31(1):102489. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Aug 6. PubMed 39117103 ↗
  • Cushion MT, Linke MJ, Ashbaugh A, Sesterhenn T, Collins MS, Lynch K, Brubaker R, Walzer PD. Echinocandin treatment of pneumocystis pneumonia in rodent models depletes cysts leaving trophic burdens that cannot transmit the infection. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 29;5(1):e8524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008524. PubMed 20126455 ↗
  • Xie J, Gao A, Zhang W, Zhao D, Liu W. Efficacy and safety of echinocandins combined with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole as first-line treatment for Pneumocystis pneumonia in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Oct 29;25(1):1443. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11857-8. PubMed 41163137 ↗
  • Kato H, Hagihara M, Asai N, Umemura T, Shibata Y, Hirai J, Yamagishi Y, Iwamoto T, Mikamo H. Efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Combination with an Echinocandin as a First-Line Treatment Option for Pneumocystis Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 26;11(6):719. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060719. PubMed 35740126 ↗
  • McDonald EG, Butler-Laporte G, Del Corpo O, Hsu JM, Lawandi A, Senecal J, Sohani ZN, Cheng MP, Lee TC. On the Treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: Current Practice Based on Outdated Evidence. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 29;8(12):ofab545. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab545. eCollection 2021 Dec. PubMed 34988242 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 added, 4 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionProportion of patients requiring new non-invasive ventilation,: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionProportion of patients with CTCAE grade 4 adverse drug reactions considered at least probably related to treatment: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionProportion of patients with change in PCP therapy due to presumed treatment failure or a probable adverse drug reaction: how it is measured was reworded
  • Addedother outcomeQuality of life using the visual analogue scale (VAS)Time frame: Day 30, day 180
  • Descriptionother outcomeHealth-related quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 5, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 1 added, 4 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionProportion of patients requiring new non-invasive ventilation,: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionProportion of patients with CTCAE grade 4 adverse drug reactions considered at least probably related to treatment: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionProportion of patients with change in PCP therapy due to presumed treatment failure or a probable adverse drug reaction: how it is measured was reworded
    • Addedother outcomeQuality of life using the visual analogue scale (VAS)Time frame: Day 30, day 180
    • Descriptionother outcomeHealth-related quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07900373
Responsible party
Emily McDonald (Associate professor of Medicine and Staff Scientist, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Naisha Y. Nicolas, MSc
Contact
naisha.nicolas@rimuhc.ca
514-934-1934 ext. 53333
Emily G. McDonald, MD MSc
Contact
emily.mcdonald@mcgill.ca
514-934-1934 ext. 53333
Emily G. McDonald, MD MSc
principal investigator · McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Todd C. Lee, MD MPH
principal investigator · McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion