ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07897578Updated Oct 27, 2026

Preoperative Nebulized Lignocaine Versus Nebulized Dexmedetomidine for Blunting the Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients

An interventional study of Group D (Dexmedetomidine) and Group L (Lignocaine) in Lignocaine, Hypertensive Patients and Dexmedetomidine, sponsored by Tanta University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy of preoperative nebulized lignocaine versus nebulized dexmedetomidine for blunting the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation in patients with controlled hypertension under medical treatment.

Read the detailed description

Securing the airway through endotracheal intubation is a fundamental responsibility of the anesthesiologist during general anesthesia. Direct laryngoscopy followed by intubation induces a stress response leading to hemodynamic changes, which are often transient, unpredictable, and variable .This response usually lasts for 30 seconds to 10 minutes The mechanisms underlying the hemodynamic responses are not completely understood, although they have been attributed to a reflex sympathetic discharge caused by stimulation of the upper respiratory tract .This pressor response is characterized by rapid increase in heart rate and blood pressure, potentially leading to arrhythmias and some other adverse events .

These effects are generally well tolerated by overall healthy patients but can be lethal to patients with pre-existing conditions such as coronary artery disease, hypertension , preeclampsia, and cerebrovascular pathologies such as tumors, aneurysms, or increased intracranial pressure .

Hypertensive patients are particularly vulnerable to these effects due to their pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. The pressor response is triggered by sympathetic stimulation during laryngoscopy, causing an average increase in blood pressure by 40-50% and heart rate by 20% . These changes, while often well-tolerated in healthy individuals, could be greater risk to those with hypertension, coronary artery disease .

To mitigate these adverse effects, various pharmacological agents have been explored. Among them, lignocaine, a widely used local anesthetic, has shown efficacy for attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation . Nebulized lignocaine, in particular, offers a non-invasive method of administration with fewer side effects compared to intravenous delivery. On the other hand, dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, is gaining attention for its sedative, analgesic, and sympatholytic properties . Current studies suggest that nebulized dexmedetomidine may offer significant hemodynamic stability with fewer side effects than intravenous administration, making it a promising alternative, especially in hypertensive patients .

The choice of agent to blunt the pressor response in hypertensive patients is an important aspect of preoperative management, as minimizing cardiovascular strain during surgery can improve patient outcomes. Although numerous pharmacological agents have been studied, the ideal drug for preoperative use remains controversial.

In particular, the use of nebulized medications offers the advantage of targeted local delivery to the upper respiratory tract, which may result in more effective control of the sympathetic response with fewer systemic side effects. Both lignocaine and dexmedetomidine have shown promise in preliminary studies, yet comparative research specifically targeting controlled hypertensive patients remains limited.

This study aims to compare the efficacy of preoperative nebulized lignocaine versus nebulized dexmedetomidine for blunting the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation in patients with controlled hypertension under medical treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lignocaine
  • Hypertensive Patients
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Laryngoscopy

Keywords

  • Lignocaine
  • Nebulized Dexmedetomidine
  • Hypertensive Patients
  • Laryngoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 321 are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (45-70 years old)
  • II
  • Controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure 140-160 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure 90-100 mmHg) on medication other than beta blocker.
  • Scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of heart failure, myocardial infarction, or arrhythmia
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics or dexmedetomidine
  • or asthma
  • Cardiac surgery
  • Any possibility of difficult intubation
  • Hepatic patients
  • On beta blockers, Ca channel blocker
  • Renal disease
  • Hyperthyroidism
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group D (Dexmedetomidine)

    Group D (Dexmedetomidine): 25 patients will undergo nebulization with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg), mixed with normal saline to a total volume of 5 mL, administered via a nebulizer face mask at a continuous flow of 6 L/min of 100% oxygen over 10 minutes before the beginning of anesthesia.

    Drug: Group D (Dexmedetomidine)

  • Experimental
    Group L (Lignocaine)

    Group L (Lignocaine): 25 patients will undergo nebulization with 2% lignocaine (1.5 mg/kg) according to ideal body weight maximum 100 mg, mixed with normal saline to a total volume of 5 mL, administered via a nebulizer face mask at a continuous flow of 6 L/min of 100% oxygen over 10 minutes before the beginning of anesthesia.

    Drug: Group L (Lignocaine)

Interventions

  • Group D (Dexmedetomidine): 25 patients will undergo nebulization with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg), mixed with normal saline to a total volume of 5 mL, administered via a nebulizer face mask at a continuous flow of 6 L/min of 100% oxygen over 10 minutes before the beginning of anesthesia.

  • Group L (Lignocaine): 25 patients will undergo nebulization with 2% lignocaine (1.5 mg/kg) according to ideal body weight maximum 100 mg, mixed with normal saline to a total volume of 5 mL, administered via a nebulizer face mask at a continuous flow of 6 L/min of 100% oxygen over 10 minutes before the beginning of anesthesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of blunting Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy

    Time frame: 10 minutes post nebulization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Heart rate change

    Time frame: 10 minutes post-intubation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tanta University
    Tanta, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — it will be available if it needed

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07897578
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Gehad Ahmed Samy Shabaan Azzam (Resident at the department of Anesthesiology Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Dec 30, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026
Completion
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Dexmedetomidine · Lidocaine

Start the discussion