ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07895212Updated Oct 26, 2026

Feasibility of the "One-Finger Technique" for Identifying the Upper Left Ureter During Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy

An interventional study of One-Finger Technique in Ovary Cancer, Cervical Cancer and Endometrial Cancer, sponsored by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2026, registered Oct 2026).
  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Updated Oct 26, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy plays an important role in the surgical treatment of major gynecological malignancies (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer). Identifying bilateral ureters is a crucial step, and dissecting the upper left ureter is particularly challenging with no standardized method. This study introduces an anatomical technique called the "One-Finger Technique" for this purpose. This prospective, single-arm exploratory study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the "One-Finger Technique" during open para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovary Cancer
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

  • One-Finger Technique
03

In context

Ovarian Neoplasms

2,759 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 735 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 59 across 2,075 interventional studies indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 279 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Females aged 18-75 years;
  • Diagnosed with gynecological malignancies (e.g., cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer) confirmed by histopathology or cytology;
  • Planned to receive open surgical treatment and have surgical indications for para-aortic lymphadenectomy according to guidelines;
  • ECOG performance status score: 0\~1;
  • Fully understand the purpose, nature, methods, and potential risks and benefits of this study, voluntarily participate in this study, and sign a written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrently have malignant tumors in other systems;
  • Previous history of left kidney or ureter surgery, or known severe anatomical variations of the urinary system (such as duplex kidney, duplex ureter, pelvic ectopic kidney, etc.);
  • Severe intestinal adhesions caused by previous abdominal surgery for other reasons;
  • Previous history of pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy, or severe adhesions and unclear anatomical structures in the retroperitoneal space due to previous abdominal surgery or severe pelvic/abdominal infection;
  • Preoperative imaging (CT/MRI) indicates massive confluent lymph nodes in the retroperitoneum, or lymph nodes that have encased major blood vessels such as the left ureter, abdominal aorta, and inferior vena cava, where routine space dissection is expected to be impossible;
  • Presence of absolute contraindications for open surgery, such as severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal insufficiency, or coagulopathy;
  • Other conditions deemed unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    "One-Finger Technique" Group

    The patients in this arm will receive the "One-Finger Technique" for dissecting and identifying the upper left ureter during para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

    Procedure: One-Finger Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureOne-Finger Technique

    A specific anatomical dissection technique using a single finger to bluntly dissect the retroperitoneal space and identify the upper left ureter during open para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of separating and identifying the upper left ureter within 5 minutes

    The proportion of patients in whom the upper left ureter (up to the level of the left renal vein or the intersection of ovarian vessels) is successfully and clearly exposed without surrounding tissue obstruction, meeting the visual requirements for subsequent safe lymph node resection. The procedure is timed via video recording. The start time is when the surgeon's finger enters the space after the lower left ureter is identified; the end time is when the upper left ureter is completely exposed and visually confirmed by the surgeon.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Evaluated within 5 minutes during the specific surgical step)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of left ureter complications

    The proportion of patients experiencing left ureter injuries. This includes intraoperative macroscopically visible ureteral contusion or rupture, and postoperative complications occurring within 30 days due to ischemia or injury, such as ureterovaginal fistula or ureteral stricture.

    Time frame: Intraoperative and up to 30 days postoperatively

  2. Incidence of adjacent vessel or organ injury

    The rate of collateral damage occurring during the "One-Finger Technique" dissection that requires additional suturing or repair, such as adjacent vessel tearing/bleeding or bowel serosal tearing.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  3. Blood loss during the target step

    The estimated local blood volume lost specifically during the single process of dissecting and identifying the upper left ureter. Because this step is brief and bleeding is usually minimal, it is recorded using visual estimation.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Assessed immediately after the completion of the specific surgical step)

  4. Conversion rate to traditional methods

    The proportion of cases where the "One-Finger Technique" is abandoned in favor of traditional direct sharp dissection due to severe local adhesions, unclear anatomy, or high pushing resistance. This reflects the clinical applicability of the technique.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 23 months after the start.

Of 251 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ovarian Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 49 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 83. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 257 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 76.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2026
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
StartActual
Jun 26, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07895212
Responsible party
Jing Li (MD, PhD, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
Start date
Jun 26, 2026
Primary completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Dongyan Wang, MD
Contact
wangdy35@mail.sysu.edu.cn
+86 15017554658
Jing Li, MD
principal investigator · Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion