ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07878559Updated Oct 16, 2026

Autologous Circulating Extracellular Vesicles for Total-Type Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

A Phase 3 interventional study of autologous circulating extracellular vesicles and Glucocorticoids in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL), sponsored by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Total-type sudden sensorineural hearing loss (defined in this study as severe-to-profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss with pure-tone average (PTA) >70 dB HL) represents one of the poorer-prognosis subtypes of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). It is characterized by severe or profound sensorineural hearing decline occurring within 72 hours, frequently accompanied by tinnitus, aural fullness, vertigo and other symptoms. Although glucocorticoid-based comprehensive therapy has been widely applied in clinical practice, overall prognosis remains unsatisfactory for patients with total-type SSNHL, with low hearing recovery rates. Long-term hearing loss impairs verbal communication, sound source localization and quality of life, and is also associated with anxiety, depression and cognitive decline. Some patients further require hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids or auditory implantation, imposing substantial psychological and economic burdens on individuals and families. Therefore, exploring safer and more innovative therapeutic strategies carries important clinical significance.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) therapy is an emerging cell-free therapeutic technology. Previous pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that EVs can ameliorate inner-ear injury via anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative-stress and neuroprotective effects, showing promising therapeutic potential in animal models of noise-induced and ototoxic drug-induced hearing loss. The investigators' prior research revealed that EV treatment effectively preserved hearing and alleviated cochlear damage in noise-deafened mice. Meanwhile, the investigators have completed a prospective, randomized exploratory clinical trial (NCT06707389). Its results indicated that intratympanic injection of extracellular vesicles (EVs) yielded favorable safety profiles in total-type SSNHL, without serious adverse events observed, and demonstrated a trend toward superior clinical benefits over conventional therapy in terms of hearing recovery and speech recognition improvement.

Based on the above evidence, the investigators intend to conduct a multicenter, prospective, superiority-design randomized controlled clinical trial enrolling 146 patients with total-type SSNHL. This study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of intratympanic autologous circulating extracellular vesicles (C-EVs) combined with glucocorticoid therapy, so as to provide new evidence-based medical data and therapeutic options for total-type SSNHL.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • total-type sudden sensorineural hearing loss
  • intratympanic injection
  • glucocorticoids
  • circulating extracellular vesicles (c-EV)
03

In context

Hearing Loss, Sudden

49 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss, Sudden; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 146 is above the median of 72 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss, Sudden.

Browse Hearing Loss, Sudden studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University is the lead sponsor of 477 studies on the registry; 278 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged ≥ 18 years old;
  2. Patients with unilateral severe or profound hearing loss (>70 dB HL) meeting the diagnostic criteria recommended by the Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (2019) (United States);
  3. Onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss within 3 weeks;
  4. Patients fully understand the purpose and requirements of this trial, voluntarily participate in the clinical trial, sign the written informed consent form, and are willing to complete the entire trial process in accordance with trial requirements;
  5. Enrolled patients shall receive inpatient treatment; for patients unable to be hospitalized, all clinical examination data must be complete;
  6. All patients must have signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The affected ear has other deafness-causing factors, such as lateral skull-base tumor, trauma, drug ototoxicity, etc.;
  2. Patients with concurrent conductive hearing loss or mixed hearing loss in the affected ear;
  3. Patients with other comorbidities of the affected ear or pre-existing hearing loss;
  4. Sudden unilateral or sequentially bilateral hearing loss (onset within several minutes to 3 days);
  5. Patients with doubts about the treatment regimen or significant psychological-psychiatric disorders;
  6. Patients with severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal dysfunction, or those deemed unsuitable for this study by physician assessment;
  7. Patients with middle-ear lesions, Ménière's disease, vestibular schwannoma, large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and other related diseases are excluded;
  8. Patients with a history of infection within 1 month prior to screening requiring hospitalization and/or antibiotic therapy, or those currently receiving systemic glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants or cytotoxic therapy;
  9. Women who are lactating, pregnant or planning to become pregnant;
  10. Patients with contraindications or allergies to the study treatment;
  11. Other patients unsuitable for intratympanic injection therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
146 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    c-EVs plus glucocorticoids

    Peripheral blood (20 mL) is collected from patients to isolate autologous circulating extracellular vesicles (C-EVs), including plasma-derived EVs and PBMC-derived EVs. The vesicles are resuspended in a mixture consisting of 0.2 mL lidocaine injection containing 40 mg methylprednisolone and 0.8 mL sterile water for injection for intratympanic administration. The injection volume is 1.0 mL, administered once every other day for a total of three times over a one-week treatment course.

    Drug: autologous circulating extracellular vesicles · Drug: Glucocorticoids

  • Active comparator
    glucocorticoids

    Intratympanic injection of methylprednisolone sodium succinate for injection (trade name: Solu-Medrol) at a concentration of 40 mg/mL. For preparation, 40 mg of methylprednisolone sodium succinate is reconstituted with 0.2 mL lidocaine injection and 0.8 mL sterile water for injection. The prepared methylprednisolone solution is administered intratympanically at an injection volume of 1.0 mL, once every other day for a total of three doses within a one-week treatment course.

    Drug: Glucocorticoids

Interventions

  • Drugautologous circulating extracellular vesicles

    Intratympanic injection of autologous circulating extracellular vesicles combined with glucocorticoids

  • Intratympanic injection of glucocorticoids

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of subjects whose pure-tone average (PTA) hearing threshold improved by >10 dB from baseline at 1 month after treatment

    According to the Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (2019) from the United States, hearing improvement is defined as an increase of more than 10 dB in pure-tone hearing threshold relative to baseline. The hearing improvement rate refers to the proportion of patients with a pure-tone hearing threshold increase of more than 10 dB, which is an objective qualitative indicator. Measured population: All subjects Measurement time points: Baseline, 1 month after treatment Evaluator: Otological Function Laboratory of the participating hospital

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. pure-tone hearing threshold

    The difference in pure-tone audiometric thresholds is obtained by pure-tone audiometry. The definition, study subjects, time points and assessor for pure-tone audiometry are the same as described above.

    Time frame: Assessment time points: 7 days after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

  2. speech recognition score (SRS)

    Speech recognition score is measured by speech audiometry. Speech audiometry is an audiometric method that uses standardized speech signals as acoustic stimuli to test subjects' speech recognition ability. Clinical test parameters include: speech recognition scores of subjects at specific speech intensities (e.g., 50, 65, 80 dB SPL representing soft, moderate and loud everyday speech levels); maximum speech recognition score (generally corresponding to intensity at speech-recognition threshold or 30-40 dB HL above pure-tone average threshold). At varying speech intensities, multiple equivalent test lists are administered sequentially to obtain the function curve of speech-recognition score versus intensity, and to derive the dynamic range of speech intensity corresponding to 20%-80% speech-recognition score.

    Time frame: Assessment time points: Baseline, 7 days after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

  3. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)

    The total THI score ranges from 0 to 100 points, divided into five grades: Grade I (slight tinnitus): 0-16 points; Grade II (mild tinnitus): 18-36 points; Grade III (moderate tinnitus): 38-56 points; Grade IV (severe tinnitus): 58-76 points; Grade V (catastrophic tinnitus): 78-100 points. Success criterion: A decrease of 15 points or more in post-treatment THI compared with pre-treatment THI.

    Time frame: Assessment time points: Baseline, 7 days after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

  4. Degree of ear fullness

    The degree of ear fullness is assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 to 10 points: 0 = no ear fullness, 10 = most severe ear fullness. Higher scores indicate more severe ear fullness. Study subjects: All subjects

    Time frame: Assessment time points: Baseline, 7 days after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

  5. vertigo severity

    Vertigo severity is evaluated using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Total DHI scores range from 0 to 100 points; higher scores indicate greater impact of vertigo on daily activities. Study subjects: Subjects with concomitant vertigo symptoms

    Time frame: Assessment time points: Baseline, 7 days after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

  6. quality of life (QoL)

    Health-related quality of life is assessed using the EuroQol Five-Dimension Five-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) to evaluate changes in subjects' health-related quality of life before and after treatment. Study subjects: All subjects

    Time frame: Assessment time points: Baseline, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

  7. Tinnitus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The VAS score ranges from 0 to 10 points; 0 indicates no discomfort, and 10 indicates severe discomfort. VAS is classified into three grades: mild (0-3 points), moderate (4-7 points), severe (8-10 points). A VAS score \>5 indicates that tinnitus has impaired quality of life. Success criterion: A decrease of 1 point or more in post-treatment VAS compared with pre-treatment VAS.

    Time frame: Assessment time points: Baseline, 7 days after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

Other outcomes

  1. Safety Indicators

    Safety evaluation focuses primarily on treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events, with special attention to local and systemic reactions potentially associated with intratympanic injection and autologous PBMC-EVs therapy. 1. Local adverse events: including injection-related pain, transient vertigo, aggravated tinnitus, aggravated ear fullness, persistent unhealed tympanic membrane perforation, middle-ear infection, otorrhea, tympanic effusion, and further deterioration of hearing after treatment. 2. Systemic adverse events: including fever, allergic reactions, vagal reflex, and other systemic discomforts judged by investigators to be possibly related to study intervention. 3. Serious adverse events: including death, life-threatening events, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, and events resulting in permanent or severe functional impairment. Subjects for safety indicator assessment: All study subjects.

    Time frame: Investigators shall perform safety assessments via medical history inquiry, otoscopic examination, vital-sign monitoring, and pure-tone audiometry at each treatment and follow-up visit.

  2. Evaluation of peripheral-blood inflammatory and nutritional status.

    Peripheral-blood levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, albumin and total cholesterol will be measured. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) will be calculated to analyze their correlations with hearing recovery and speech recognition improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 7 days after treatment.

  3. Quality evaluation of PBMC-derived extracellular vesicles

    Routine quality assessments including particle-size distribution will be performed for each batch of PBMC-EVs. Representative batches will be tested for canonical extracellular-vesicle markers and other biological characteristics to explore their associations with clinical efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline and 7 days after treatment.

  4. Biobank establishment

    Peripheral-blood specimens (PBMCs, plasma and serum) will be collected and stored from subjects before and after treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and 7 days after treatment.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Otoendoscope
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07878559
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Jiaqi Pang, Doctor
Contact
54331601@qq.com
86+13512722134
Haidi Yang, Doctor
principal investigator · Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion