ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07893041Updated Oct 23, 2026

Exercise Rehabilitation to Improve Long-term Outcomes in Sarcoma Survivors.

An interventional study of Supervised Exercise Rehabilitation Program in Sarcoma, Sarcoma of Bone and Connective Tissue and Sarcoma of Soft Tissue, sponsored by Curtin University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Curtin University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 12 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2014, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

People who have had a sarcoma removed from the leg often live with weak muscles, stiff joints, and trouble walking. These problems can last for years. Formal medical follow-up usually ends about five years after treatment. Few studies have tested exercise at this stage.

This study tested an 8-week supervised exercise program. Participants were adults aged 18 to 67 who were at least 5 years past limb-sparing (wide resection) surgery for a leg sarcoma. They attended a clinic in Perth, Western Australia, twice a week for one hour. The program built leg strength, joint movement, balance, walking, and fitness. It progressed through three phases and was matched to each person's surgery and ability.

All participants received the same program type. There was no comparison group. Each person was tested twice before starting to confirm stable function. Testing was repeated at the end of the 8 weeks. It was repeated again 8 weeks later, after a period with no supervised exercise.

The main outcome was high-level mobility, measured by the High-level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT). This tool scores walking, running, hopping, and stair climbing. Other outcomes were six-minute walk distance, leg strength, joint range of motion, and self-reported physical function and quality of life (TESS and SF-36 questionnaires).

The study aimed to learn two things. First, whether exercise improves strength and mobility years after sarcoma surgery. Second, whether those gains last after supervision stops.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcoma
  • Sarcoma of Bone and Connective Tissue
  • Sarcoma of Soft Tissue
  • Sarcoma of Bone

Keywords

  • rehabilitation
  • lower limb sarcoma
  • cancer survivorship
  • exercise rehabilitation,
  • physical function
  • exercise physiology
03

In context

Sarcoma

1,691 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoma; 393 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 40 across 1,300 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoma.

Browse Sarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Curtin University is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 5 years post treatment for sarcoma involving wide resection surgery on the lower limb
  • Aged 18 to 70 years
  • Male or female
  • Lives in the Perth metropolitan area
  • Provided voluntary, written informed consent, including permission to publish de-identified data
  • Capable of completing an exercise-based program

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently engaged in a formal rehabilitation program at another institution
  • Estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Concurrent orthopaedic condition unrelated to the sarcoma treatment
  • Cognitive disturbance, serious psychopathology or emotional instability that may hinder participation
  • Unable to speak, read and understand English well enough to complete assessments and questionnaires
  • Severe cardiovascular disease or other life-threatening illness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Supervised Exercise Rehabilitation

    Adults at least 5 years after wide resection surgery for lower limb sarcoma. All participants received the 8-week, fully supervised exercise rehabilitation program described under Interventions. They attended a clinic in Perth, Western Australia, twice weekly for 1 hour. The program was individualised to each person's surgery and ability. Participants were assessed twice at baseline, at 8 weeks, and at 16 weeks, after 8 weeks without supervised exercise.

    Behavioral: Supervised Exercise Rehabilitation Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralSupervised Exercise Rehabilitation Program

    Behavioral. An 8-week, fully supervised, individualised exercise program for adults at least 5 years after wide resection for lower limb sarcoma. Sessions ran twice weekly for 1 hour (16 sessions), one-to-one, adjusted to each person's resection and ability. Resistance, aerobic, range of motion, balance and gait training progressed through three phases with achievement criteria. Phase 1 (weeks 1-2): range of motion, isolated muscle activation, hydrotherapy gait re-education, home exercises. Phase 2 (weeks 2-4): weighted leg flexion, hip abduction and adduction, closed-chain exercises, balance training, mirror gait retraining, 10 minutes continuous aerobic exercise at about 50% maximum heart rate. Phase 3 (weeks 4-8): squats, lunges, single-leg balance on uneven surfaces, multi-joint tasks, aerobic exercise at 60-70% maximum heart rate. No supervised exercise followed from weeks 8 to 16.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. High-level Mobility Assessment Tool, HiMAT

    The HiMAT measures high-level walking-based mobility across 13 timed or scored items: walking forwards and backwards, walking on toes, stepping over an obstacle, running, skipping, hopping, bounding on each leg, and ascending and descending stairs. Scores sum to a total from 0 to 54. Higher scores indicate better mobility. The primary outcome is the change in total score from baseline to the end of the 8-week supervised exercise program, and the retention of that change at 16 weeks, after 8 weeks without supervised exercise. Baseline is the second of two baseline assessments, taken one week apart to confirm stability. A 4-point change is considered clinically meaningful.

    Time frame: Baseline (second of two assessments), 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. six-minute walk test distance

    Participants walked back and forth between two points 50 m apart for 6 minutes. They covered as much distance as they could safely manage. The tester gave standardised phrases and no encouragement. Total distance in metres was recorded, along with pain in the affected limb and breathlessness at the end. Higher distance indicates better walking capacity. A change of 50 m is considered clinically meaningful.

    Time frame: Baseline (second assessment), 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. lower limb isokinetic strength (peak torque)

    Knee extension and flexion peak torque measured bilaterally on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60 degrees per second, after warm-up repetitions. Values are normalised to body weight (Nm/kg). Hip abduction, adduction and flexion strength were also assessed by three-repetition maximum. Higher values indicate greater strength.

    Time frame: Baseline (second assessment), 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  3. lower limb joint range of motion

    Active range of motion in degrees, measured with a goniometer or bubble inclinometer on both limbs. Joints: hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension, ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion.

    Time frame: Baseline (second assessment), 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  4. Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, lower limb

    The 32-item lower limb version of the TESS, completed unassisted. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better function

    Time frame: Baseline (second assessment), 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  5. SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores

    The 36-item Short Form Health Survey, completed unassisted. Eight domains combine into a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better perceived health.

    Time frame: Baseline (second assessment), 8 weeks, 16 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Apr 20, 2013

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2014 to primary completion in May 2015, 16 months.

Of 147 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sarcoma, half reached primary completion within 59 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 120. This study's 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 150 studies reached it within 59 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 120.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 19, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completionActual
May 30, 2015
CompletionActual
Oct 30, 2015
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07893041
Lead sponsor
Curtin University
Responsible party
Claire Munsie (Lecturer, Curtin University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completion
May 30, 2015
Completion
Oct 30, 2015
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion