ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07892963Updated Oct 23, 2026

Comparative Study of Regional Nerve Blocks in Primary Cleft Palate Repair

An interventional study of Palatal Nerve Block and Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block in Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate +/- Lip and Pain Management, sponsored by Children's National Research Institute. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 9 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Children's National Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate whether adding a suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block to the standard palatal nerve block improves pain control after cleft palate repair surgery in children. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the standard palatal block alone or the standard palatal block combined with a suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block. Both techniques use medications commonly used for pain management during surgery.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of the suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block reduces postoperative pain, decreases the need for opioid medications, and improves recovery after cleft palate repair. Researchers will compare pain scores, medication use, recovery outcomes, and any treatment-related complications between the two groups.

Information collected from this study may help identify the most effective regional anesthesia approach for children undergoing cleft palate repair and may improve postoperative pain management and patient recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cleft Lip
  • Cleft Palate +/- Lip
  • Pain Management
  • Wound Dehiscence, Surgical

Keywords

  • Nerve Block
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Craniofacial Surgery
  • Anesthesiology
03

In context

Cleft Lip

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Cleft Lip; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 144 is above the median of 30 across 117 interventional studies indexed under Cleft Lip.

Browse Cleft Lip studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's National Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 127 studies on the registry; 47 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children undergoing primary cleft palate repair or secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) surgery.
  • Eligible to receive regional anesthetic nerve blocks as part of the planned surgical procedure.
  • Parent or legal guardian able and willing to provide informed consent.
  • Participant meets all institutional and surgical criteria for undergoing the planned procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to the study anesthetic medications.
  • Medical conditions that contraindicate regional anesthetic nerve block procedures.
  • Coagulopathy or bleeding disorder that would increase the risk of nerve block placement.
  • Active infection at or near the planned injection site.
  • Inability of parent or legal guardian to provide informed consent.
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation unsafe or interfere with study assessments.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
144 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard Palatal Nerve Block

    Participants receive the standard palatal nerve block performed during cleft palate surgery.

    Procedure: Palatal Nerve Block

  • Experimental
    Standard Palatal Nerve Block Plus Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block

    Participants receive the standard palatal nerve block plus a suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block during cleft palate surgery.

    Procedure: Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block

Interventions

  • ProcedurePalatal Nerve Block

    Regional anesthetic block of the palate performed during cleft palate or velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery using local anesthetic. This procedure serves as the standard pain management approach and is intended to provide perioperative analgesia and reduce postoperative pain.

  • ProcedureSuprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block

    Regional anesthetic block of the maxillary nerve performed via a suprazygomatic approach using local anesthetic in addition to the standard palatal nerve block. The procedure is intended to enhance perioperative analgesia, decrease postoperative pain, and reduce postoperative opioid requirements following cleft palate or velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Scores

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using age-appropriate validated pain scales following cleft palate repair or velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery. Pain scores will be compared between participants receiving a standard palatal nerve block and those receiving a standard palatal nerve block plus a suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block to evaluate the effectiveness of the additional regional anesthesia technique.

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours following surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    Total postoperative opioid medication use will be recorded and compared between participants receiving a standard palatal nerve block and those receiving a standard palatal nerve block plus a suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block. This outcome will assess whether the additional regional anesthesia technique reduces the need for opioid analgesics following surgery.

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours following surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with researchers outside of the study team. Data collected for this study contain protected health information and were obtained under informed consent and institutional review board requirements that do not include plans for external sharing of individual participant-level data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 12 months later.

Of 60 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cleft Lip, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 19, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 16, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 16, 2028
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07892963
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Dec 16, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 16, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 16, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Logan Stratton
Contact
lstratton@childrensnational.org
443-922-6012
Albert Oh
Contact
202-713-8856

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion