ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07889934Updated Oct 22, 2026

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery

An interventional study of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway and Conventional Perioperative Care in Colorectal Cancer and Colorecatal Cancer Surgery, sponsored by University of West Attica. Completed at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by University of West Attica · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 22, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compared an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care program with conventional perioperative care in adults undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either ERAS care or usual care. The ERAS program included coordinated measures before, during, and after surgery aimed at supporting faster and safer recovery. The study evaluated whether ERAS could reduce the length of hospital stay and improve postoperative recovery. Other outcomes included early mobilization, return of bowel function and oral feeding, postoperative pain, complications and adverse events, removal of urinary catheters and drains, discontinuation of intravenous therapy, and selected laboratory measures. The study was conducted at the General Anticancer Oncology Hospital of Athens "Saint Savvas" in Greece.

Read the detailed description

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are multimodal, evidence-based perioperative care pathways designed to reduce the physiological stress of surgery and promote earlier functional recovery. In colorectal cancer surgery, recovery may be influenced by several factors, including postoperative pain, delayed mobilization, gastrointestinal dysfunction, prolonged intravenous therapy, and the continued use of catheters and drains.

This randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the implementation of an ERAS pathway in adult patients undergoing surgical resection for colorectal cancer and to compare postoperative recovery with that achieved through conventional perioperative care. The ERAS pathway incorporated coordinated interventions across the perioperative period, including preoperative preparation and education, perioperative analgesic management, postoperative mobilization, nutritional recovery, and planned discontinuation of supportive devices and therapies.

The study focused on clinically relevant indicators of postoperative recovery. Particular attention was given to the duration of postoperative hospitalization, return of gastrointestinal function, mobilization, postoperative pain, complications and adverse events, and the timing of withdrawal of supportive interventions. Laboratory parameters were also assessed as complementary indicators of perioperative recovery.

The study was conducted in a real-world oncology hospital setting and was intended to assess whether a structured ERAS pathway could improve postoperative recovery compared with the conventional perioperative care routinely provided to patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Colorecatal Cancer Surgery

Keywords

  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • ERAS
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Perioperative Care
  • Postoperative Recovery
  • Length of Stay
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Early Mobilization
  • Bowel Function
  • Nursing Care
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,734 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,481 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is above the median of 77 across 4,222 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of West Attica is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
  • Scheduled to undergo surgical resection of the colorectal tumor.
  • Ability to understand and communicate in Greek.
  • Sufficient cognitive capacity to understand the study information, provide informed consent, and participate in the study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current treatment for chronic pain.
  • Use of psychopharmacological medication as defined in the study protocol.
  • Acute or chronic renal disease.
  • Acute or chronic hepatic disease.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

    Participants received a structured Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) perioperative care pathway for colorectal cancer surgery. The pathway included coordinated perioperative measures intended to reduce surgical stress and promote earlier postoperative recovery, including preoperative preparation and education, perioperative analgesic management, postoperative mobilization, nutritional recovery, and planned discontinuation of supportive devices and therapies.

    Other: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Perioperative Care

    Participants received the conventional perioperative care routinely provided for colorectal cancer surgery at the study center.

    Other: Conventional Perioperative Care

Interventions

  • OtherEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway

    A multimodal perioperative care pathway applied before, during, and after colorectal cancer surgery, designed to reduce surgical stress and accelerate functional recovery.

  • OtherConventional Perioperative Care

    Routine perioperative care provided at the study center to patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay

    Number of calendar days from the date of surgery to the date of hospital discharge, obtained from the hospital medical record. A shorter postoperative hospital stay indicates earlier discharge after colorectal cancer surgery.

    Time frame: From the date of surgery to hospital discharge, up to approximately 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Postoperative Mobilization

    Time from completion of surgery to the patient's first mobilization out of bed. Recovery time was recorded using predefined postoperative time categories: 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and more than 24 hours.

    Time frame: From surgery until first mobilization, assessed during the first postoperative day and thereafter if needed

  2. Time to Full Postoperative Mobilization

    Time from surgery until the patient achieved full postoperative mobilization. Time was recorded in predefined categories of 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and more than 24 hours.

    Time frame: From surgery until full mobilization

  3. Time to Return of Gastrointestinal Motility

    Time from surgery to documented return of gastrointestinal motility. Recovery time was recorded using predefined categories of 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and more than 24 hours.

    Time frame: From surgery until return of gastrointestinal motility

  4. Time to Postoperative Oral Feeding

    Time from surgery to resumption of postoperative oral feeding, recorded using predefined categories of 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and more than 24 hours.

    Time frame: From surgery until resumption of oral feeding

  5. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity assessed using a four-category verbal rating scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = very severe pain. Pain was assessed repeatedly during the postoperative period.

    Time frame: 0-2, 2-6, 6-12, and 12-24 hours after surgery; postoperative days 1, 2, and 3; and at hospital discharge

  6. Occurrence of Postoperative Complications and Adverse Events

    Occurrence of one or more predefined postoperative complications or adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, drowsiness, sedation, fever, local inflammation, bleeding, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, ileus, and reoperation. Events were recorded individually and as a composite binary outcome indicating the occurrence of any complication or adverse event.

    Time frame: From surgery until hospital discharge

  7. Time to Urinary Catheter Removal

    Time from surgery to removal of the urinary catheter, recorded using predefined categories of 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and more than 24 hours.

    Time frame: From surgery until urinary catheter removal

  8. Time to Surgical Drain Removal

    Time from surgery to removal of postoperative surgical drains, recorded using predefined categories of 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and more than 24 hours.

    Time frame: From surgery until drain removal

  9. Time to Discontinuation of Intravenous Therapy

    Time from surgery to discontinuation of postoperative intravenous therapy, recorded using predefined categories of 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and more than 24 hours.

    Time frame: From surgery until discontinuation of intravenous therapy

Other outcomes

  1. Postoperative Hemoglobin

    Postoperative hemoglobin concentration measured in g/dL. Postoperative values were evaluated in relation to the corresponding preoperative value.

    Time frame: postoperative day 1

  2. Postoperative Hematocrit

    Postoperative hematocrit measured as percentage (%). Postoperative values were evaluated in relation to the corresponding preoperative value.

    Time frame: postoperative day 1

  3. Postoperative White Blood Cell Count

    Postoperative white blood cell count measured in ×10³/μL. Postoperative values were evaluated in relation to the corresponding preoperative value.

    Time frame: postoperative day 1

  4. Postoperative Blood Glucose

    Postoperative blood glucose concentration measured in mg/dL. Postoperative values were evaluated in relation to the corresponding preoperative value.

    Time frame: postoperative day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • General Anticancer Oncology Hospital of Athens "Saint Savvas"
    Athens, 11522, Greece
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data are not planned to be shared because no prospective data-sharing framework or participant consent for external data sharing was established for this study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 9 months.

Of 801 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 845 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2026
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
StartActual
Sep 17, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 25, 2025
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07889934
Lead sponsor
University of West Attica
Collaborators
Saint Savvas Anticancer Hospital
Responsible party
MARIA BOURAZANI (Nurse Manager, Anesthesiology Department, General Anticancer Oncology Hospital of Athens "Agios Savvas"; PhD, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of West Attica, University of West Attica) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
Start date
Sep 17, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 25, 2025
Completion
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Martha Kelesi, Prof
study chair · Nursing Department, University of West Attica

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion