ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07888829Updated Oct 22, 2026

G-CSF In Neonatal Sepsis With Neutropenia

An interventional study of Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and Standard Sepsis Management in Neonatal Sepsis and Neutropenia, sponsored by University of Health Sciences Lahore. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 0 Days to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by University of Health Sciences Lahore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 22, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Days to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate whether adding G-CSF to standard treatment improves outcomes in newborns (0-28 days) with sepsis and neutropenia. It will compare survival, recovery of neutrophil counts, hospital stay, infections, and adverse effects between babies receiving G-CSF and standard treatment alone.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjuvant treatment in neonates with sepsis and neutropenia.

Neonatal sepsis is a clinical syndrome occurring during the first 28 days of life in which infection is associated with a systemic inflammatory response. In this study, neonatal sepsis will be identified on the basis of clinical features and laboratory findings, including signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), positive blood, urine, or tracheal secretion cultures and/or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). SIRS is defined by the presence of at least two specified criteria involving body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate or PaCO2, and leukocyte count. Neutropenia is defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) below 1500/µL.

G-CSF is a glycoprotein that promotes the growth, survival, and differentiation of neutrophils and enhances their antimicrobial activity. The study is based on the rationale that neutropenia in neonates with sepsis may be associated with poorer treatment outcomes because of limited neutrophil reserves and impaired recovery of neutrophil production. Increasing neutrophil counts through G-CSF administration may therefore improve the clinical course of affected neonates.

The study will be conducted in the Department of Neonatology at The Children's Hospital/The University of Child Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan. The planned study duration is at least six months after approval of the study synopsis.

A total of 52 neonates will be enrolled and divided into two groups of 26 participants each. The intervention group will receive standard sepsis management plus G-CSF at a dose of 10 µg/kg/day administered subcutaneously for three days. The control group will receive standard sepsis management alone. ANC will be monitored daily.

Eligible participants will be neonates aged 0-28 days admitted to the Department of Neonatology who meet the study definition of sepsis and have an ANC below 1500/µL. Neonates with congenital anomalies, birth asphyxia, primary immunodeficiency, or previous treatment with colony-stimulating factor or another adjuvant therapy will be excluded.

Data will be collected using a study proforma. Baseline clinical and laboratory information will be recorded, including gestational age, birth weight, clinical signs, blood culture results, complete blood count, ANC, CRP and other relevant laboratory findings. Following treatment, hematological parameters and clinical outcomes will be monitored.

The primary purpose of the study is to assess whether G-CSF improves clinical outcomes in neonates with sepsis and neutropenia. Outcomes assessed will include mortality, duration of neutropenia, duration of hospital stay, frequency of healthcare-associated infections, and adverse effects. Healthcare-associated infections assessed in the study include catheter-associated urinary tract infection, central-line-associated bloodstream infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia.

The study will compare outcomes between neonates receiving standard sepsis management with G-CSF and those receiving standard sepsis management alone. Quantitative variables will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics, while qualitative variables will be presented as frequencies and percentages. Statistical comparisons will be performed using the planned statistical tests, with a p-value below 0.05 considered statistically significant.

The study is intended to determine whether G-CSF provides an additional clinical benefit when used alongside standard treatment in neonates with sepsis and neutropenia. Its findings may provide evidence to guide clinicians and inform future management of this high-risk neonatal population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Sepsis
  • Neutropenia

Keywords

  • G-CSF
  • Neutrophil Count
  • Sepsis Treatment
  • Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor
  • Neonatal Sepsis
  • Anti-Infective Agents
03

In context

Neonatal Sepsis

186 studies on the registry are indexed under Neonatal Sepsis; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 180 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Neonatal Sepsis.

Browse Neonatal Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Health Sciences Lahore is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Days to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Neonates aged 0-28 days admitted to the Department of Neonatology/The Children's Hospital Lahore.
  • Neonates diagnosed with sepsis according to the study's operational definition.
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 1500/µL.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates with congenital anomalies.
  • Neonates with birth asphyxia.
  • Neonates with primary immunodeficiency.
  • Neonates already receiving treatment with colony-stimulating factor.
  • Neonates already receiving any other adjuvant therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    G-CSF Plus Standard Sepsis Management

    This group consists of 26 neonates with sepsis and neutropenia who receive G-CSF in addition to standard sepsis management.

    Biological: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)

  • Active comparator
    Standard Sepsis Management Alone

    This group consists of 26 neonates with sepsis and neutropenia who receive standard sepsis management without G-CSF.

    Biological: Standard Sepsis Management

Interventions

  • BiologicalGranulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)

    Drug pages: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor · Filgrastim

    Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) will be administered to neonates with sepsis and neutropenia. G-CSF will be given at a dose of 10 µg/kg/day. The drug will be administered subcutaneously for 3 consecutive days. G-CSF will be given in addition to standard sepsis management. The intervention group consists of 26 neonates.

  • BiologicalStandard Sepsis Management

    Neonates in the control group will receive standard sepsis management for the treatment of neonatal sepsis and neutropenia. No G-CSF will be administered to this group. The control group consists of 26 neonates. Outcomes will be monitored and recorded during the study. These include mortality, duration of neutropenia, duration of hospital stay, healthcare-associated infections, and adverse effects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Mortality among neonates with sepsis and neutropenia will be compared between the intervention group receiving G-CSF plus standard sepsis management and the control group receiving standard sepsis management alone.

    Time frame: From enrollment until discharge or death, within the first 28 days of life

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)

    The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) will be measured before and after G-CSF administration to assess improvement in neutrophil count among neonates with sepsis and neutropenia.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 3 (daily assessments during the 3-day treatment period)

  2. Duration of Neutropenia

    Duration of neutropenia will be assessed in neonates with sepsis and neutropenia and compared between the intervention and control groups. Neutropenia is defined as an absolute neutrophil count below 1500/µL.

    Time frame: From enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 28 days of life

  3. Duration of Hospital Stay

    The duration of hospitalization will be recorded for neonates in the intervention and control groups and compared to determine whether addition of G-CSF is associated with a shorter hospital stay.

    Time frame: From enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 28 days of life

  4. Frequency of Healthcare-Associated Infections

    The frequency of healthcare-associated infections will be recorded and compared between the intervention and control groups. Healthcare-associated infection is defined as a new episode of infection occurring ≥72 hours after G-CSF administration in a neonate initially admitted with sepsis and neutropenia.

    Time frame: From enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 28 days of life

  5. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI)

    The occurrence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection will be recorded in neonates in both study groups and compared between the intervention and control groups during hospitalization.

    Time frame: From enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 28 days of life

  6. Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI)

    The occurrence of central line-associated bloodstream infection will be recorded in neonates in both study groups and compared between the intervention and control groups during hospitalization.

    Time frame: From enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 28 days of life

  7. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

    The occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia will be recorded in neonates in both study groups and compared between the intervention and control groups during hospitalization.

    Time frame: From enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 28 days of life

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's hospital University of Child Health Sciences Lahore
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54000, Pakistan
    • Children's hospital University of Child Health Sciences Lahore · Contact · info@chich.edu.pk · 042-99230901-23
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Metcalf D. Hematopoietic cytokines. Blood. 2008 Jan 15;111(2):485-91. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-079681. PubMed 18182579 ↗
  • Kaushansky K. Lineage-specific hematopoietic growth factors. N Engl J Med. 2006 May 11;354(19):2034-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052706. No abstract available. PubMed 16687716 ↗
  • Khan TH, Shahidullah M, Mannan MA, Nahar N. Effect of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) for the treatment of neonates in presumed sepsis with neutropenia. Mymensingh Med J. 2012 Jul;21(3):469-74. PubMed 22828545 ↗
  • Hoesel LM, Gao H, Ward PA. New insights into cellular mechanisms during sepsis. Immunol Res. 2006;34(2):133-41. doi: 10.1385/IR:34:2:133. PubMed 16760573 ↗
  • Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):228-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4. Epub 2010 Dec 9. PubMed 21146207 ↗
  • Odabasi IO, Bulbul A. Neonatal Sepsis. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020 Jun 12;54(2):142-158. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2020.00236. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32617051 ↗
  • Hamer DH, Coffin SE. Burden of Neonatal Sepsis in Low-resource Settings: High Risk, High Reward. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(2):281-282. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa550. No abstract available. PubMed 32421766 ↗
  • Fitchett EJA, Seale AC, Vergnano S, Sharland M, Heath PT, Saha SK, Agarwal R, Ayede AI, Bhutta ZA, Black R, Bojang K, Campbell H, Cousens S, Darmstadt GL, Madhi SA, Meulen AS, Modi N, Patterson J, Qazi S, Schrag SJ, Stoll BJ, Wall SN, Wammanda RD, Lawn JE; SPRING (Strengthening Publications Reporting Infection in Newborns Globally) Group. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for Newborn Infection (STROBE-NI): an extension of the STROBE statement for neonatal infection research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;16(10):e202-e213. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30082-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12. PubMed 27633910 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2027; primary completion for Mar 2027, 1 month later.

Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Neonatal Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 1 month is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 9, 2026
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
StartEst.
Feb 15, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Mar 20, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 25, 2027
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07888829
Lead sponsor
University of Health Sciences Lahore
Responsible party
Ahmad Yar (Speciality Registrar, University of Health Sciences Lahore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
Start date
Feb 15, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 25, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Muhammad Nayyab Tahir, Clinical Fellow Neonatology
Contact
m.nayyabtahir@gmail.com
+92 336 7744073
Bushra Fatima
Contact
fatimaalvi2000@yahoo.com
Bushra Fatima
study chair · Children's hospital/ University of Child Health Sciences Lahore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion