ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06772675Updated Sep 24, 2026

Vancomycin Reduction Practices (VRP) in the NICU

An interventional study of External Facilitation in Antibiotic Stewardship, Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset and Vancomycin, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Recruiting at 13 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This multi-center, cluster randomized study aimed at improving implementation of vancomycin reducing practices (VRP) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Sites will be recruited and randomized to receive either external facilitation or no external facilitation to assess the effect on center-level fidelity to the core components of VRP implementation. Interventions available to both study arms are directed at hospital staff and includes identification of local champions, educational outreach, unit-level audit \& feedback, and use of a clinical decision support tool.

02

Conditions studied

  • Antibiotic Stewardship
  • Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset
  • Vancomycin

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • implementation study
03

In context

Neonatal Sepsis

192 studies on the registry are indexed under Neonatal Sepsis; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 13 is below the median of 181 across 102 interventional studies indexed under Neonatal Sepsis.

Browse Neonatal Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is the lead sponsor of 489 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Level III NICU
  • Affiliated with Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) or Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Newborn Care Network (CNBCN)
  • Recruited by study team

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Site not recruited for the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sites receiving external facilitation

    Sites will receive guidance from an external facilitator to support uptake of the VRP.

    Behavioral: External Facilitation

  • No intervention
    Sites not receiving external facilitation

    Sites will not receive guidance from an external facilitator.

Interventions

  • BehavioralExternal Facilitation

    Designated external facilitators will conduct monthly meetings with local champions at each site. Designated facilitators will follow the developed facilitation guide, that includes content area to cover in each meeting, case scenarios as examples, and tips on how to communicate and support the internal facilitators. The goal is to enable problem-solving and support the local champion in implementing VRP with fidelity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fidelity of VRP use

    Proportion of late onset sepsis (LOS) evaluations performed with high fidelity. High fidelity is defined when the evaluation follows all three core components of VRP use.

    Time frame: 2.5 years - From beginning of implementation phase to the end of the sustainment phase

Secondary outcomes

  1. Appropriateness/acceptability

    Response to questions about whether vancomycin reducing practices (VRP) was agreeable and/or a good fit for the unit measured using validated instruments comprising of 5-point Likert scales (Weiner et al). Participants are offered options ranging from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (5), with higher scores indicating a higher degree of acceptability or feasibility.

    Time frame: 2.5 years - From beginning of implementation phase to the end of the sustainment phase

07

Study locations

13 of 13 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Participants here are the clinicians at the sites randomized to external facilitation. The investigators obtain survey (de-identified) and interview data from representative group of the clinicians. Since the investigators will be gathering richly detailed qualitative data that, even if de-identified of names or locations, can still be linked back to sites or individuals, the investigators will not share interview data for secondary analysis or use beyond the purposes of the proposal. The investigators will maintain de-identified (for both site and respondent identifiers) survey output that can be shared upon appropriate request to the principal investigator.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 27 months after the start.

Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Neonatal Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 27 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2025
First posted
Jan 13, 2025
StartActual
Jun 2, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2027
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06772675
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Responsible party
Sagori Mukhopadhyay (Principal Investigator, Attending Neonatologist, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 13, 2025
Start date
Jun 2, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Kayla Gilpin
Contact
kayla.gilpin@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
215-573-3976
Morgan Gabbert
Contact
gabbertm@chop.edu
267-233-3150
Sagori Mukhopadhyay, MD, MMSc
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion