ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07821190Updated Sep 15, 2026

MDW as a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker in LONS Among Preterm Neonates

An observational study in Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis, sponsored by Tanta University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 73 Hours to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
73 Hours to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a novel biomarker for late-onset neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates and to assess its association with disease severity and short-term clinical outcomes

Read the detailed description

Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among newborns worldwide. It represents a systemic inflammatory response to infection that can rapidly progress to severe complications, including multi-organ dysfunction and death. The clinical presentation is often nonspecific, making early diagnosis challenging and frequently delayed. The diagnosis of LOS relies on a combination of clinical suspicion, microbiological confirmation, and supportive laboratory findings. Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis, as it confirms the infection and identifies the causative organism, allowing for targeted antibiotic therapy. Biomarkers play an essential role in the early detection and management of sepsis. Commonly used biomarkers include C-reactive protein (CRP), an indicator of systemic inflammation and infection. However, these markers have limitations, including delayed elevation, lack of specificity, and variability in sensitivity, especially in neonatal populations. Additional diagnostic tools such as molecular assays (e.g., polymerase chain reaction techniques) have improved the speed of pathogen identification but are not yet universally available. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a novel hematological parameter that reflects changes in monocyte size and morphology during inflammatory processes. Monocytes are among the first immune cells to respond to infection, undergoing functional and structural alterations that can be quantitatively assessed through MDW.

02

Conditions studied

  • Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • MDW
  • LONS
03

In context

Neonatal Sepsis

192 studies on the registry are indexed under Neonatal Sepsis; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 200 across 85 observational studies indexed under Neonatal Sepsis.

Browse Neonatal Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 321 are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
73 Hours to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

A total of 60 preterm neonates with clinical suspicion of late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) will be included. All eligible neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Pediatrics Department, Tanta University Hospitals, will be screened, and those meeting the inclusion criteria will be enrolled consecutively at the time of first clinical suspicion of sepsis

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:The study will include:

  1. Preterm neonates with gestational age \<37 weeks.
  2. Neonates aged >72 hours of life at the time of enrollment.
  3. Neonates with clinical suspicion of late-onset neonatal sepsis, defined by the presence of one or more of the following:

    • Temperature instability (core temperature >38°C or \<36°C)
    • Respiratory distress or new-onset apnea
    • Feeding intolerance or poor feeding
    • Lethargy or irritability
    • Bradycardia or tachycardia
    • Hypotension
    • Unexplained clinical deterioration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates with any of the following will be excluded from the study:

    1. Early onset neonatal sepsis.
    2. Major congenital anomalies
    3. Chromosomal abnormalities
    4. Metabolic disorders
    5. Severe perinatal asphyxia
    6. Neonates with surgical conditions
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Sepsis group

    This group will include 30 preterm neonates with suspected LONS who fulfill the predefined clinical and laboratory criteria of clinical sepsis and/or have positive blood culture

    Diagnostic Test: MDW measurement

  • Control group

    It will include 30 neonates evaluated for suspected sepsis who will have negative blood cultures, will not fulfill the predefined clinical sepsis criteria, and will have an alternative non-infectious diagnosis.

    Diagnostic Test: MDW measurement

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMDW measurement

    Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW), which represents the standard deviation of monocyte cell volume, will be measured at the time of first clinical suspicion of LONS, preferably before the initiation of antibiotic therapy when possible, using 2 mL peripheral venous blood collected in EDTA tubes. Blood samples will be analyzed as soon as possible after collection using an automated hematology analyzer that reports MDW. The result will be recorded as part of the CBC without requiring an additional blood sample.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Performance of Monocyte Distribution Width for Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis

    Monocyte distribution width (MDW) will be measured as part of the complete blood count at the time of first clinical suspicion of late-onset neonatal sepsis. Its diagnostic performance for culture-proven late-onset neonatal sepsis will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including area under the curve (AUC), optimal cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: At enrollment, with reference classification based on blood culture results available within approximately 5 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Wang J, Hu M and Wang N. Combined detection of monocyte distribution width and procalcitonin for diagnosing and prognosing neonatal sepsis. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):64. 2. Wu J, Li L and Luo J. Diagnostic and prognostic value of monocyte distribution width in sepsis. J Inflamm Res. 2022;20(15):41-63. 3. Coggins SA,Mohan P and Glaser K. Updates in Late-Onset Sepsis: Risk Assessment, Therapy, and Outcomes. Neoreviews. 2022;23(11):738-55. 4. Shah J, Jefferies AL and Yoon EW. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Late-Onset Bacterial Sepsis in Preterm Neonates Born at < 32 Weeks' Gestation. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(7):675-82. 5. Duignan SM, Lakshminrusimha S, Armstrong K, et al. Neonatal sepsis and cardiovascular dysfunction I: mechanisms and pathophysiology. Pediatr Res. ';95(5):1207-16. 6. Eichberger J, Resch E and Resch B. Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: the role of inflammatory markers. Front pediatr. 2022;10(8):84-90. 7. Stylianou-Riga P, Boutsikou T, Kouis P, et al. Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and complications of late-onset neonatal sepsis among preterm neonates in Cyprus: a prospective case-control study. BMC Pediatr. 2024;24(1):50-60. 8. Sands K, Spiller OB and Thomson K. Early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-and middle-income countries: current challenges and future opportunities. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;9(15):933-46. 9. Li J, Xiang L, Chen X, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neonatal sepsis and other neonatal infections, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182(5):35-43. 10. Bromiker R, Elron E and Klinger G. Do Neonatal Infections Require a Positive Blood Culture? Am J Perinatol. 2020;37(2):18-21. 11. Celik IH, Hanna M and Canpolat FE. Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: the past, present and future. Pediatr Res. 2022;91(2):337-50. 12. Tum FC, Ngeranwa JJ and Maiyoh GK. Validity of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as biomarkers in diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in a referral hospital, K
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 37 non-industry observational studies under Neonatal Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 38 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2026
First posted
Sep 15, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 30, 2027
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07821190
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Lamiaa Khaled Zidan (Lecturer of Pediatrics, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Lamiaa Khaled Zidan
Contact
lamia.kh.z@gmail.com
00201007958439

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion