ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07670624T6ASepsisUpdated Sep 9, 2026

T6A Biomarker for Detection of Bacterial Infection in Newborn Infants

An observational study in Sepsis, Newborn Sepsis and Biomarker Discovery, sponsored by Salzburger Landeskliniken. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Salzburger Landeskliniken · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This bi-center study aims to assess the efficacy of a new biomarker, N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A), for the early diagnosis of Early-Onset Sepsis (EOS) in newborns.

Read the detailed description

This bi-center study aims to assess the efficacy of a new biomarker, N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A), for the early diagnosis of Early-Onset Sepsis (EOS) in newborns.

Background:

EOS is a significant concern for newborns, especially preterm infants, with a high mortality rate. Current diagnostic methods, like blood cultures, have limitations due to non-specific clinical presentations and slow turnaround times. Existing biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) also have limitations in terms of early detection and specificity.

Objective:

To facilitate the early diagnosis of EOS in newborns at risk for bacterial infection on day one.

Hypotheses:

t6A levels will rapidly increase in newborns with suspected EOS, allowing for early and precise identification from non-EOS neonates.

Circulating t6A will demonstrate higher diagnostic accuracy (positive and negative predictive values) compared to existing biomarkers like PCT, CRP, and IL-6.

Methodology:

This will be an open-label prospective cohort bi-center study conducted at the Private Medical University of Salzburg, Austria together with the Medical University of Wrocław in cooperation with the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna Austria

Study Population: Newborn infants requiring blood testing for suspected bacterial infection or routine screening who meet specific inclusion criteria and whose caregivers provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria include refusal to participate or current antibiotic treatment.

Control Group: 50 healthy newborn infants undergoing routine blood testing for other reasons (e.g., thyroid hormone testing).

Data Collection: Blood samples (20 µl using Neoteryx® Microsampling kit) will be collected via heel prick during routine patient care within the first 24 hours of life. Clinical and blood value data will also be collected. Samples will be analyzed for t6A, CBC, CRP, PCT, and IL-6.

Sepsis Confirmation: Bacterial infection will be confirmed using adapted NEO-KISS criteria, which include clinical sepsis and microbiologically confirmed sepsis (with and without coagulase-negative staphylococci).

Timeline: Patient enrollment will occur between February 1, 2026, and January 31, 2029.

Sample Size: A minimum of 210 participants (105 sepsis, 105 control) is planned to achieve adequate statistical power, based on AUC values of t6A and PCT from a previous study.

Data Management: Patient data will be anonymized with three-digit identification numbers. Blood samples will be sent to Pharm-analyt for testing.

Analysis/Statistics: Data will be analyzed using R. Primary outcome (differences in t6A levels) will be assessed using t-tests or Wilcoxon tests. Secondary outcomes (comparison of AUCs for t6A vs. IL-6 and CRP) will use DeLong's test with Bonferroni-Holms correction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Newborn Sepsis
  • Biomarker Discovery

Keywords

  • t6a
  • newborn sepsis
  • infectious disease biomarker
  • biomarker
03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is above the median of 150 across 1,162 observational studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Salzburger Landeskliniken is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Newborn infants

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Newborn infants who require blood testing for screening for bacterial infection OR treating physician suspects bacterial infection in newborn infant
  • Signed form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refusal to participate in study or not providing written by caregivers/parents
  2. Antibiotic treatment of any kind.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Week
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients
  • Controls
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with Clinical Sepsis

    1\. Clinical Sepsis (no pathogen detected): All of: * Initiation of adequate antimicrobial therapy ≥5 days by attending physician * No pathogen detected in blood culture or not tested * No clear infection elsewhere AND at least 2 of: * Fever (\>38°C) or temperature instability or hypothermia (\<36.5°C) * Tachycardia (\>200/min) or new/increased bradycardia (\<80/min) * Capillary refill \>2s * New/increased apnoea (\>20 s) * Unexplained metabolic acidosis (BE \< -10 mval/l) * New onset hyperglycaemia (\>140 mg/dl) * Other sepsis signs (skin color, abnormal labs, increased oxygen demand, unstable status, apathy)

    Time frame: 12 Hours

  2. Number of participants with Microbiologically Confirmed Sepsis (excluding coagulase negative staphylococci CNS)

    Microbiologically Confirmed Sepsis (excluding coagulase negative staphylococci CNS) AND at least 2 of: * Fever (\>38°C) or temperature instability or hypothermia (\<36.5°C) * Tachycardia (\>200/min) or new/increased bradycardia (\<80/min) * Capillary refill \>2s * New/increased apnoea (\>20 s) * Unexplained metabolic acidosis (BE \< -10 mval/l) * New onset hyperglycaemia (\>140 mg/dl) * Other sepsis signs (skin color, abnormal labs, increased oxygen demand, unstable status, apathy)

    Time frame: 12 Hours

  3. Number of participants with Microbiologically confirmed Sepsis with CNS

    Microbiologically confirmed sepsis with CNS as the sole pathogen One lab value (without other plausible cause) * CRP \>2mg/dl * I/T ratio \> 0.2 * Platelets \<100/nl * Leukocytes \<5/nl AND at least 2 of: * Fever (\>38°C) or temperature instability or hypothermia (\<36.5°C) * Tachycardia (\>200/min) or new/increased bradycardia (\<80/min) * Capillary refill \>2s * New/increased apnoea (\>20 s) * Unexplained metabolic acidosis (BE \< -10 mval/l) * New onset hyperglycaemia (\>140 mg/dl) * Other sepsis signs (skin color, abnormal labs, increased oxygen demand, unstable status, apathy)

    Time frame: 12 Hours

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Paracelsus Medical Private University- University Hospital Salzburg Dept. of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neonatology
    Salzburg, 5020, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Lorenz Stana-Hackenberg · Contactl.stana-hackenberg@salk.at · +4357255-57757
    • Martin Wald, Assoc. Prof. · Sub investigator
    • Maria Strasser, MD · Sub investigator
    • Maren Doenhardt · Sub investigator
    • Lorenz Stana-Hackenberg, MD · Principal investigator
  • Wroclaw Medical University
    Wroclaw, 50367, Poland
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mackay CA, Nathan EA, Porter MC, Shrestha D, Kohan R, Strunk T. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Neonatal Sepsis: Experience from a Tertiary Australian NICU. Neonatology. 2024;121(6):703-714. doi: 10.1159/000539174. Epub 2024 Jun 18. PubMed 38889701 ↗
  • Osuchowski MF, Adamik B, Gozdzik W, Skalec T, Mascher D, Redl H, Zipperle J, Fritsch G, Voelckel W, Winkler MS, Moerer O, Schutz H, Mascher H. The novel biomarker t6A accurately identified septic patients at admission but failed to predict outcome. Crit Care. 2025 Mar 20;29(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05354-2. No abstract available. PubMed 40114270 ↗
  • Zhou M, Cheng S, Yu J, Lu Q. Interleukin-8 for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 May 21;10(5):e0127170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127170. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25996378 ↗
  • Al Gharaibeh FN, Lahni P, Alder MN, Wong HR. Biomarkers estimating baseline mortality risk for neonatal sepsis: nPERSEVERE: neonate-specific sepsis biomarker risk model. Pediatr Res. 2023 Oct;94(4):1451-1456. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02414-z. Epub 2022 Dec 13. PubMed 36513805 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2029, 28 months after the start.

Of 491 non-industry observational studies under Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 58. This study's planned 28 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 543 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 2, 2026
First posted
Jun 26, 2026
StartActual
Sep 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2029
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07670624
Lead sponsor
Salzburger Landeskliniken
Collaborators
Wroclaw Medical University, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology - The research center in cooperation with AUVA
Responsible party
Lorenz Auer-Hackenberg (Principal Investigator, Salzburger Landeskliniken) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 26, 2026
Start date
Sep 3, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Lorenz Stana-Hackenberg, MD
Contact
L.stana-hackenberg@salk.at
+4357255-57757

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion