ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07883915MI-SMR-NSCNPUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motor Imagery Exercises and Suboccipital Myofascial Release Techniques in Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain

An interventional study of Active Exercise and Motor Imagery in Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain, sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this three-group randomized controlled study is to investigate the effectiveness of MI and SMR interventions on pain, proprioception, quality of life, disability, and ROM parameters in individuals aged 18-50 with NSCNP.

The primary research questions it seeks to answer are as follows:

Do MI exercises, when applied in addition to active exercise, lead to changes in pain, proprioception, and kinesiophobia in individuals with NSCNP? Does the suboccipital myofascial release technique, when applied in addition to active exercise, lead to changes in pain, proprioception, and kinesiophobia in individuals with NSCNP? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups to compare the MI and SMR techniques.

Read the detailed description

Proprioception is considered a crucial element in the seamless execution of pain-free movement. In cases of chronic pain, proprioceptive ability is compromised due to altered sensorimotor control at various levels of pain transmission. Motor imagery (MI) is utilized to enhance motor performance and facilitate the learning of motor tasks, while suboccipital myofascial release (SMR) improves neck-related disability and overall pain. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of MI and SMR techniques in the management of non-specific neck pain (NSCNP) remains limited.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of MI exercises and the SMR technique in the management of NSCNP through a multifaceted evaluation, and to expand the range of effective, sustainable, and accessible conservative treatment alternatives. A dual inclinometer, goniometer, and algometer will be employed in the study. Participants will undergo assessments including proprioception, pressure pain threshold, and neck range of motion (ROM).

The data obtained will shed light on the efficacy of these interventions regarding parameters such as pain intensity, disability, and kinesiophobia, potentially serving as foundational data for the future development of diagnostic, therapeutic, and clinical processes in this field.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • nscnp
  • proprioception
  • pain management
  • motor imagery
  • suboccipital myofascial release
03

In context

Agnosia

1,269 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 524 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 51 is below the median of 75 across 1,089 interventional studies indexed under Agnosia.

Browse Agnosia studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University is the lead sponsor of 238 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having an MIQ-3 score that is at most two standard deviations above or below the mean,
  • Having a Dizziness Handicap Inventory score below 20,
  • Having a diagnosis of NSCNP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wiplash,
  • Pregnancy,
  • Neoplasia,
  • Infectious or inflammatory disorders,
  • Specific neck pain resulting from traumatic events involving bone fractures or neck injuries,
  • Osteoarthritic changes,
  • Positive neurological signs or evidence of spinal compression,
  • Neck pain associated with vertigo,
  • Cervical surgeries,
  • Acute headache,
  • Headaches occurring prior to the onset of neck pain and headaches of non-cervical origin
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1: Control / Active Exercise Group

    An active exercise program will be implemented.

    Other: Active Exercise

  • Experimental
    Group 2: Active Exercise + Motor Imagery Group

    In addition to active exercise, motor imagery exercises will be administered.

    Other: Active Exercise · Other: Motor Imagery

  • Experimental
    Group 2: Active Exercise + Suboccipital Myofascial Release Group

    In addition to active exercise, the suboccipital myofascial release technique will be applied.

    Other: Active Exercise · Other: Suboccipital Myofascial Release

Interventions

  • OtherActive Exercise

    Active exercises will consist of four cervical movements involving the maintenance of craniocervical flexion, and all of these exercises will be performed in a single session. The program will continue for six weeks.

  • OtherMotor Imagery

    Motor imagery exercises are structured in three stages. First stage: performing a guided mental task Second stage: internal visual imagery Third stage: external visual imagery The program will last for six weeks.

  • OtherSuboccipital Myofascial Release

    It will be performed by the therapist while the participant is in the supine position. The therapist will apply pressure to the suboccipital region until a reduction in muscle tone is detected. The procedure will be continued for six weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proprioception

    Measurement will be performed using a dual inclinometer. Joint position sense error will be evaluated.

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks

  2. Pain Pressure Threshold

    The pressure pain threshold will be assessed using an algometer.

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks

  3. Range of Motion (ROM)

    ROM will be assessed using a goniometer.

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia for Kinesiophobia

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks

  2. SF-36 for Quality of Life

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks

  3. Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale for Neck Disability

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks

  4. Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire for Pain Intensity

    Time frame: baseline, six weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Hospital
    Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07883915
Responsible party
Bahar Anaforoglu (Prof. Dr., Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Ayça ŞİRİN, Master of Science
Contact
ayca41sirin@gmail.com
+90 545 410 59 00

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion